Need some Advice
#11
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: B747-400 FO
Thanks for all your feedback guys. A little more info about my background: Most of my time is flying 135 cargo so weather is not an issue for me. I know that air ambulance is very demanding, but I've flown under worse circumstances. Also, it is my ultimate goal to end up at a major (hopefully FedEx). I'm also trying to get into the ANG flying a C130. I will find out about that in a couple of months. I guess if I get that slot, then I can take an extended leave of absence with Pinnacle and keep my seniority number while in UPT.
#12
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Yeah, I'd focus on the ANG first...that will be more career enhancing.
I mentioned the challenges of air ambulance just in case you were a 300 hour wonder with 900 hours in an RJ...
I mentioned the challenges of air ambulance just in case you were a 300 hour wonder with 900 hours in an RJ...
#13
[QUOTE=rickair7777;431253] That industry does not have the greatest safety record.
QUOTE]
Sure there have been alot of Air Ambulance accidents. But when you get the call to fly it's because someone's life is truely on the line. This itself can be a tremendous amount of pressure in pushing the limits.
QUOTE]
Sure there have been alot of Air Ambulance accidents. But when you get the call to fly it's because someone's life is truely on the line. This itself can be a tremendous amount of pressure in pushing the limits.
#14
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: B747-400 FO
Nope, not a 300 hour wonder. I came to the company with about 2700 hours which included nearly 400 hours of actual instrument. Most of the sim instructors were happy to have someone who knew how to talk on the radios.
#15
elfouquer,
I flew air ambulance for 7 years. Perhaps my experience will help you decide...
My company had both rotor and fixed wing. Since you are looking at a King Air, I'll stick to the fixed wing side.
Fixed wing air ambulance is inter facility transport: from the patient's current hospital, to one with higher care. Mostly that means from a small town to a bigger city.
I have worked two schedules: 12 hours on, 12 off, 7 days on/7 off; and 24 hours, 20 days on/10 off. Both were on call with a response time of 20 minutes. That means 20 minutes to get to the plane, be ready to close doors, and turn engines. The 12/12 is more common, though the days on/off vary between companies.
The flying was challenging. Mostly night flights down, often to non-towered (or closed tower) airports. Only about half the places I flew had an ILS, and a few had no approaches. Occasionally, we flew to unimproved (turf or gravel) runways. The flight time was split evenly between 135 and 91. Every one of our PCs included a hand flown, single engine, non-precision (NDB if available), circle to land approach. 99% of it was single pilot. Flight time averaged about 200 hours PER YEAR.
The industry is often criticized for its safety record. Part of that is due to the type of flying done: crappy airports (or in the case of the helicopters, a wide spot in the road), in the middle of no where, with little wx information. I may get slammed for this, but too often it was the size of the pilot's b@lls that got him in trouble. Too big and he thought he could do anything, too small and he succumbed to the pressure of "If you don't fly, you're gonna kill this kid." (The most important thing for me was to remember I didn't make that kid sick, but a bad decision on my part COULD kill the kid, the nurses, and ME).
Good luck with whatever you choose,
j
I flew air ambulance for 7 years. Perhaps my experience will help you decide...
My company had both rotor and fixed wing. Since you are looking at a King Air, I'll stick to the fixed wing side.
Fixed wing air ambulance is inter facility transport: from the patient's current hospital, to one with higher care. Mostly that means from a small town to a bigger city.
I have worked two schedules: 12 hours on, 12 off, 7 days on/7 off; and 24 hours, 20 days on/10 off. Both were on call with a response time of 20 minutes. That means 20 minutes to get to the plane, be ready to close doors, and turn engines. The 12/12 is more common, though the days on/off vary between companies.
The flying was challenging. Mostly night flights down, often to non-towered (or closed tower) airports. Only about half the places I flew had an ILS, and a few had no approaches. Occasionally, we flew to unimproved (turf or gravel) runways. The flight time was split evenly between 135 and 91. Every one of our PCs included a hand flown, single engine, non-precision (NDB if available), circle to land approach. 99% of it was single pilot. Flight time averaged about 200 hours PER YEAR.
The industry is often criticized for its safety record. Part of that is due to the type of flying done: crappy airports (or in the case of the helicopters, a wide spot in the road), in the middle of no where, with little wx information. I may get slammed for this, but too often it was the size of the pilot's b@lls that got him in trouble. Too big and he thought he could do anything, too small and he succumbed to the pressure of "If you don't fly, you're gonna kill this kid." (The most important thing for me was to remember I didn't make that kid sick, but a bad decision on my part COULD kill the kid, the nurses, and ME).
Good luck with whatever you choose,
j
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
I don't think anybody is safe and if you start a new job, you could be on the street soon. I agree with the LOA and check it out first. I think any pilot could get a unpaid leave right now. An air ambulance will be affected by the sudden increase in fuel just like an airline. It could go out of business just as easily. Do you have to sign a training contract?
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Well, a LOA with PNCL unless medical, I don't see it happening. All they do is whine about not having enough FOs but off course, they won't hire more. Being an FO at the bottom of the siniority list in 9E is a nightmare. Remember, things are not moving, if you are on reserve, you'll stay on reserve for a while. If I had the oportunity you have right now, I think I'd take it. Never flown air ambulance before, but here's my reasoning:
Turbine PIC, hum..... good, very good
Pay, I'm not sure how much you'd be making, but for sure is more than 9E, isn't it?
Be based at home, hummm.....like it a lot
Job stability....either way is a gamble
Regionals are going to start hiring back again at some point, you'll always have the option to get your 121 experience, maybe even in a better company, a 135 or corporate gig is harder to get under those conditions you mentioned.
Being an FO at the bottom of the siniority list at 9E is going to get old really quick, specially now that the single most imoportant reason pilots chose to come to 9E is gone (upgrade time)
9E has nothing to offer right now in my opinion. Off course several regionals neither under these day's circumstances......
Anyways, remember 9E is a bottom feeder, and it'll always be, you are not leaving a top tier company....
Whatever you choose, good luck !
Turbine PIC, hum..... good, very good
Pay, I'm not sure how much you'd be making, but for sure is more than 9E, isn't it?
Be based at home, hummm.....like it a lot
Job stability....either way is a gamble
Regionals are going to start hiring back again at some point, you'll always have the option to get your 121 experience, maybe even in a better company, a 135 or corporate gig is harder to get under those conditions you mentioned.
Being an FO at the bottom of the siniority list at 9E is going to get old really quick, specially now that the single most imoportant reason pilots chose to come to 9E is gone (upgrade time)
9E has nothing to offer right now in my opinion. Off course several regionals neither under these day's circumstances......
Anyways, remember 9E is a bottom feeder, and it'll always be, you are not leaving a top tier company....
Whatever you choose, good luck !
#18
Quality of life is everything. Do what's best for you.
If it's an established company with good equipment and I were in your situation, I would be hard pressed to not consider it.
It's true that nothing is safe right now, however I think the airlines are much more volitile than 135. Sick people will continue getting sick just like rich people will still be rich.
If it's an established company with good equipment and I were in your situation, I would be hard pressed to not consider it.
It's true that nothing is safe right now, however I think the airlines are much more volitile than 135. Sick people will continue getting sick just like rich people will still be rich.
#19
Contrary to what many folks think, fuel does not affect air ambulances like it does scheduled carriers. Since the aircraft are flown so little, the fixed costs (insurance, payroll, aircraft cost) are the majority of the expenses. In our case, the nurses were probably the biggest single expense.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tigermagicjohn
Flight Schools and Training
9
01-23-2006 08:44 AM



