![]() |
Originally Posted by captain152
(Post 518275)
Again ... I stick with my previous statement ... I don't give a sh1t what anyone says about a call I make to keep a plane full of people safe. If I have to make a call that grounds an airplane, so be it. Every situation is unique to that specific flight, and the captain that makes the "go/no-go" decision is in charge with no limitations to his authority. These Saabs are old and things do happen with old planes ... especially ones as complicated as these.
UNION |
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 518280)
Yes but where does she get off making these calls and questioning a decision. If it is a widely agreed bad decision (see captain flying to IAH after losing an engine after t/o at CLL) then the CA needs to be reprimanded. To "monday morning quarterback" every captain about every abort is ridiculous and even more reason for a.....wait for it.....
UNION |
Union was what I was going for. Just a reminder that having someone in the pilots' corner makes it easier to make the correct decision.
|
NWS is driven off one of the left buses so w/o the bus tie on it wouldn't work. I had her call me about a gate return because the right side ahars wouldn't initialize. I just ok'd her to death. I'd do the same thing again.
|
Originally Posted by flyguyniner11
(Post 518321)
NWS is driven off one of the left buses so w/o the bus tie on it wouldn't work. I had her call me about a gate return because the right side ahars wouldn't initialize. I just ok'd her to death. I'd do the same thing again.
Just remember you dont answer to S.B.:rolleyes: There's a reason why she's back. |
Originally Posted by flyguyniner11
(Post 518321)
NWS is driven off one of the left buses so w/o the bus tie on it wouldn't work. I had her call me about a gate return because the right side ahars wouldn't initialize. I just ok'd her to death. I'd do the same thing again.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:01 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands