Quote:
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 573726)
All I've ever heard from you guys is how well things are going and how things have all gone according to plan. The things I've said weren't speculation they were words taken from CAL, RAH, and XJT. Jim Ream said, and you can listen to him on yahoo finance, that branded was costing more than expected. I might have been told numerous times how wrong I've been but it's been by your same small pile of people. I'm no making this up. You might not want to hear it but it was the truth and never a cheap shot taken at the pilot group. The thing is that when I post I base it off facts. You seem to think that because four of you can say "No things are great" that it's true.
XJT - ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. - Google Finance
What can I say I learned to read a graph. One post you guys accuse me of reading too many finacial statements the next you say I'm making it all up. This is starting to turn funny.
|
You clearly don't know how to read annual reports. Ream is right, Branded was costing more because of fuel, just like any other stand-alone airline.
The financial targets and projections were met, and we still lost money because they were based of fuel at a high of $60 a barrel (also in the annual reports and news releases upon closing Branded). Branded performed well, and could potentially still be around, but LK won this round, and his 1st wish was to get the XR's back, which meant shutting down branded...it's that simple.
So you're wrong, branded performed according to plan. No one planned or was ready for $140 a barrel.
Funny how you didn't even touch the CPA after I showed you that it was for 204 aircraft and we continue to operate 214 to cover the CRJ gap. We're still here, operating outside of BK protection. Anything else?
|