I suppose a good counter-argument to a SLI is that unlike many of the other companies that go under, pilots at Mesa have seen this coming for years. Those that had have moved on even at the expense of seniority or got their time and moved up. Those that are left, IMO are there solely to get ahead by using the quick upgrades. People who play that kind of gamble with their career should accept defeat if Mesa goes BK.
I think a decent compromise is to give preferential hiring to ex-mesa pilots after the companies gone but perhaps a straight SLI is a bit too generous. |
I would suggest you all listen carefully to what Nevets is saying. He is not simply making this up. What he speaks of is the greatest achievement to come out of this year's ALPA BOD. The fee for departure carriers have been negotiating secretly ever since to do exactly what he proposes. ALPA feels it's the only way to end whipsaw at the regional level. They feel it will prevent an airline, say Delta, from simply eliminating a high cost regional, say ASA, and replacing them with a low cost one. It would force them to take the pilots if they take the planes.
It sounds great on paper. The only problem is negotiating it and incorporating it into the contracts. Management ain't gonna like it. That means major concessions to get it. Is it really worth it, Nevets? Or will it just be another paper tiger like mainline scope? |
Originally Posted by iPilot
(Post 604754)
I suppose a good counter-argument to a SLI is that unlike many of the other companies that go under, pilots at Mesa have seen this coming for years. Those that had have moved on even at the expense of seniority or got their time and moved up. Those that are left, IMO are there solely to get ahead by using the quick upgrades. People who play that kind of gamble with their career should accept defeat if Mesa goes BK.
I think a decent compromise is to give preferential hiring to ex-mesa pilots after the companies gone but perhaps a straight SLI is a bit too generous. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 604927)
I don't think that's a good counter argument at all. How would you argue that pilots at Mesa saw the writing on the wall for years? :confused:
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 604927)
How would you argue that pilots at Mesa saw the writing on the wall for years? :confused:
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 604737)
I gave up a couple years seniority to preserve my dignity, self-respect, and QOL...and now you want me turn around and give up seniority to those who didn't make the jump? They played their hand, I played mine...and the spineless ones actually made it possible for JO to do what he does best.
A national system would be fine...but it's like insurance...you have to buy into BEFORE your house burns down. Maybe the "spineless ones" fled and the strong ones stayed and fought to improve things. |
Originally Posted by TheDashRocks
(Post 604935)
Your dignity and self-respect hinge on who you work for? Why would you give an employer, or anyone that sort of power over you?
Maybe the "spineless ones" fled and the strong ones stayed and fought to improve things. And for the record SlapHappy, this is about the umpteenth thread you've started about "big news" at SkyWest. Since I've been here the only big things that have come along are: the rise and fall of the midwest flying and the LAX base. With both of those changes nobody knew about them until they were actually awarding spots in the respective new domiciles. You're drunk on company Koolaid again and I might have to find you a sponsor and a 12 step program this time. |
Originally Posted by TheDashRocks
(Post 604935)
Your dignity and self-respect hinge on who you work for? Why would you give an employer, or anyone that sort of power over you?
Originally Posted by TheDashRocks
(Post 604935)
Maybe the "spineless ones" fled and the strong ones stayed and fought to improve things.
|
the big announcement is bs... but it seems to be true that we have some additional flying via pro rate and increased block hours. enough to warrant no more VLA.
|
Originally Posted by flyboyzz1
(Post 605149)
the big announcement is bs... but it seems to be true that we have some additional flying via pro rate and increased block hours. enough to warrant no more VLA.
After all, an RJ FO working only 10-15 hours with 10 days off per month makes the same as a line holding EMB FO who averages 90+ hours of pay with 14-15 days off. The last EMB line holder has a hire date of June of 08 and the last RJ line holder has a hire date of Mid 07. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:46 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands