Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Latest "SkyWest Big Announcement™" (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/39623-latest-skywest-big-announcementu.html)

iPilot 05-02-2009 04:52 PM

I suppose a good counter-argument to a SLI is that unlike many of the other companies that go under, pilots at Mesa have seen this coming for years. Those that had have moved on even at the expense of seniority or got their time and moved up. Those that are left, IMO are there solely to get ahead by using the quick upgrades. People who play that kind of gamble with their career should accept defeat if Mesa goes BK.

I think a decent compromise is to give preferential hiring to ex-mesa pilots after the companies gone but perhaps a straight SLI is a bit too generous.

John Pennekamp 05-03-2009 06:13 AM

I would suggest you all listen carefully to what Nevets is saying. He is not simply making this up. What he speaks of is the greatest achievement to come out of this year's ALPA BOD. The fee for departure carriers have been negotiating secretly ever since to do exactly what he proposes. ALPA feels it's the only way to end whipsaw at the regional level. They feel it will prevent an airline, say Delta, from simply eliminating a high cost regional, say ASA, and replacing them with a low cost one. It would force them to take the pilots if they take the planes.

It sounds great on paper. The only problem is negotiating it and incorporating it into the contracts. Management ain't gonna like it. That means major concessions to get it. Is it really worth it, Nevets? Or will it just be another paper tiger like mainline scope?

johnso29 05-03-2009 06:28 AM


Originally Posted by iPilot (Post 604754)
I suppose a good counter-argument to a SLI is that unlike many of the other companies that go under, pilots at Mesa have seen this coming for years. Those that had have moved on even at the expense of seniority or got their time and moved up. Those that are left, IMO are there solely to get ahead by using the quick upgrades. People who play that kind of gamble with their career should accept defeat if Mesa goes BK.

I think a decent compromise is to give preferential hiring to ex-mesa pilots after the companies gone but perhaps a straight SLI is a bit too generous.

I don't think that's a good counter argument at all. How would you argue that pilots at Mesa saw the writing on the wall for years? :confused:

John Pennekamp 05-03-2009 06:35 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 604927)
I don't think that's a good counter argument at all. How would you argue that pilots at Mesa saw the writing on the wall for years? :confused:

Is that any different than the pilots who left decent regionals to go to compass? They will be stapled above all other regionals when what ALPA's working on happens.

dontsurf 05-03-2009 06:46 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 604927)
How would you argue that pilots at Mesa saw the writing on the wall for years? :confused:

the rest of us saw the writing. people i've known that worked at mesa, and in some cases still do, saw the writing. it's big giant letters on a huge wall. not hard to see. especially by those people working at the company!

TheDashRocks 05-03-2009 06:49 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 604737)
I gave up a couple years seniority to preserve my dignity, self-respect, and QOL...and now you want me turn around and give up seniority to those who didn't make the jump? They played their hand, I played mine...and the spineless ones actually made it possible for JO to do what he does best.

A national system would be fine...but it's like insurance...you have to buy into BEFORE your house burns down.

Your dignity and self-respect hinge on who you work for? Why would you give an employer, or anyone that sort of power over you?

Maybe the "spineless ones" fled and the strong ones stayed and fought to improve things.

duvie 05-03-2009 02:25 PM


Originally Posted by TheDashRocks (Post 604935)
Your dignity and self-respect hinge on who you work for? Why would you give an employer, or anyone that sort of power over you?

Maybe the "spineless ones" fled and the strong ones stayed and fought to improve things.

Haha, I'm not one to jump into these arguments, but I'm gonna have to raise the BS flag really, really high on this one. You stayed at Mesa to get your PIC time, not to improve the industry.

And for the record SlapHappy, this is about the umpteenth thread you've started about "big news" at SkyWest. Since I've been here the only big things that have come along are: the rise and fall of the midwest flying and the LAX base. With both of those changes nobody knew about them until they were actually awarding spots in the respective new domiciles. You're drunk on company Koolaid again and I might have to find you a sponsor and a 12 step program this time.

rickair7777 05-03-2009 03:40 PM


Originally Posted by TheDashRocks (Post 604935)
Your dignity and self-respect hinge on who you work for? Why would you give an employer, or anyone that sort of power over you?

Because you either take their abuse or get fired. It's not optional at mesa...I've been there, you can't BS me.


Originally Posted by TheDashRocks (Post 604935)
Maybe the "spineless ones" fled and the strong ones stayed and fought to improve things.

Get real. The spineless ones stayed and rolled over for OJ when they had him by the short hairs last year. If I had thought that enough folks would stand up and ACTUALLY improve things, I would have stayed too. I started to have my doubts, turns out I was right.

flyboyzz1 05-03-2009 05:17 PM

the big announcement is bs... but it seems to be true that we have some additional flying via pro rate and increased block hours. enough to warrant no more VLA.

JetJock16 05-03-2009 05:24 PM


Originally Posted by flyboyzz1 (Post 605149)
the big announcement is bs... but it seems to be true that we have some additional flying via pro rate and increased block hours. enough to warrant no more VLA.

UAL has also sure'd up our 120's through 2011 with talks about 2013 (from KB). We currently have 59 on property but we are only using 49 (includes spares). The 10 will still be sold at around $4-5M/per but it will have no effect on our operations. UAL has also advised SKW that they can expect high block hours on these airframes. So much that NO EMB pilots can get LOA's and due to the projected understaffing on the FO side (almost no reserves for peak) they are considering running a small transition class (10-15) from RJ to EMB for those FO's who would like to move over (some already have their bid in and many are sitting in ORD or MKE went they're from the west coast).

After all, an RJ FO working only 10-15 hours with 10 days off per month makes the same as a line holding EMB FO who averages 90+ hours of pay with 14-15 days off. The last EMB line holder has a hire date of June of 08 and the last RJ line holder has a hire date of Mid 07.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:46 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands