Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
"Remember 3407" Airline Labor Reform Act >

"Remember 3407" Airline Labor Reform Act

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

"Remember 3407" Airline Labor Reform Act

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2009 | 08:11 PM
  #31  
sigep_nm's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Talking

Originally Posted by Mason32
Didn't work so well for AMR with the planes leased to TSA.... that just came back, with AD's not complied with, parts timed out, MEL misapplied, and repairs doen incorrectly. It should be a lesson to ANY mainline carrier that is considering subcontracting...

AMR is only now realizing how much more liability they exposed themselves to with a subcontractor, than with their in-house.
I think maybe I wasnt clear in my post but I will try to sum it up. Basically what the MEC of DAL is trying to is to create a standard for who is able to bid for flying (ie. 9E, XJ, OO, etc) It would all boil down to minimum requirements of the CBA for a regional airline. For example, minimum contract requires first year pay of $30 and hour. If you current CBA doesnt meet that requirment, you will not be allowed to bid on any flying that DAL has put out. What that would do is prevent Mesa from coming in, opening a base is MSP and then undercutting the other carriers who meet these standards. Maybe that is what AMR did, I honestly didnt follow them, maybe this is more clear, or maybe this is what you interpreted anyway.
Reply
Old 05-18-2009 | 05:47 AM
  #32  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,131
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by iPilot
Instead of single items to fix like duty limits or pay, let's try and push to level the playing field between pilots and management. I suggest overhauling the RLA and let unions at the various airlines dictate what our pay should be.
I asked a senior ALPA guy (from FDX) this exact question several years ago.
His explanation was that since RLA has some benefits for both sides, neither ALPA nor ATA wants to open that can of worms...with congress involved, nobody knows what they might end up with.

Not saying that's the right answer, but that appears to be the mentality of the leadership....let sleeping dogs lie.
Reply
Old 05-18-2009 | 07:28 AM
  #33  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Exclamation Asking for trouble

Originally Posted by rickair7777
... neither ALPA nor ATA wants to open that can of worms...with congress involved, nobody knows what they might end up with.
That's a valid concern -- just consider the unintended consequences of airline deregulation. I'm reminded of a "Three Stooges" episode where the hapless homeowner asks Curley, Larry, and Moe to fix a simple plumbing leak.
Reply
Old 05-18-2009 | 07:31 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Jet Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
That's a valid concern -- just consider the unintended consequences of airline deregulation. I'm reminded of a "Three Stooges" episode where the hapless homeowner asks Curley, Larry, and Moe to fix a simple plumbing leak.
Isn't that the same episode where Larry is pulling a ton of wires through some pipes? They were in a mansion where the owner was hosting some sort of a party if my memory serves me correctly.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
naley70b
Regional
5
11-06-2008 05:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices