![]() |
Originally Posted by N118NW
(Post 614484)
Not all of us care about money. Flying is my passion, has been for the previous 10 years... right now while I'm waiting for the industry to turn around, I'm paying off my debts and saving money, so that when I do get picked up by an airline, even if the pay is low for a year or so, I have enough in savings to assist my financial responsibilities.
|
This isn't the first time this week that similar thoughts have been brought up on these boards.
I chimed in in favor of ATP minimums being the standard qualifications for all new-hires at 121 carriers. The reality for the next couple of years, is that (close to) these higher standards will prevail, i.e. pilot surpluss. Common sense says that regional airlines will ALWAYS pick up less qualified applicants rather than pay more for more experienced pilots. Crappy for our profession? yes. Potentially unsafe? Certainly. Going to change? I would bet against it. This proposal is just another in the long line of pipe dreams that are not credible in today's system. Get over it, or get a new career. |
Originally Posted by CANAM
(Post 614470)
I hate to say it, but I think many of us have wasted a hundred grand. It's like going to med-school to become a daycare attendant. Except a daycare attendant makes more money than a pilot and is home every night. And, oh yeah, has weekends off.
"Neat job....horrible career" and I couldn't agree more. |
Originally Posted by N118NW
(Post 614484)
Not all of us care about money. Flying is my passion, has been for the previous 10 years... right now while I'm waiting for the industry to turn around, I'm paying off my debts and saving money, so that when I do get picked up by an airline, even if the pay is low for a year or so, I have enough in savings to assist my financial responsibilities.
One day the number of people willing to spend 100k for training only to earn 40k after five years will dry up. When that happens pay will come up. That is the only way I see it happening. |
Originally Posted by Brian Wilson
(Post 614645)
I think I just threw up a little. People that fly because of "passion" or love should stick to GA otherwise it clouds judgement. Do I enjoy flying absolutely, would I pick another career if it pays better and home every night. In a heartbeat.
One day the number of people willing to spend 100k for training only to earn 40k after five years will dry up. When that happens pay will come up. That is the only way I see it happening. So why don't you then? (just ribbin' ya;)) |
Originally Posted by N118NW
(Post 614484)
Not all of us care about money. Flying is my passion, has been for the previous 10 years... right now while I'm waiting for the industry to turn around, I'm paying off my debts and saving money, so that when I do get picked up by an airline, even if the pay is low for a year or so, I have enough in savings to assist my financial responsibilities.
|
Captain Pay
If airlines and others expect regionals to hire experienced pilots there needs to be some fundamental changes to the current system. Why is it that a captain makes around twice what the average FO makes? How is an experienced pilot with a family to feed expected to accept a job that pays less than the local grocery store?
If pay was taken away from the captains and given to the first officers then this profession would regain a lot of its lost security. Currently even if you are an experienced pilot and were to loose your job or switch employers you have to start over at zero at the next company. If every company paid a moderate wage to each pilot then that risk would be minimized. Currently however each company has a small percentage of the pilot group that makes the bulk of the available wages. Incidentally they are also the ones who usually negotiate the contract often years before the new hire even has a chance to voice their wishes. It is not a fair system especially during times when a guy could be stuck as an FO for most of a decade. As the current system is established the position of first officer is clearly intended as an apprentice job. Therefore they need to go to young single low experienced pilots who can afford to live on those wages in trade for gaining valuable experience. Grown up and experienced pilots with families to feed need to be able to earn a good living. If companies wish to hire lifelong professional pilots then they need to shift the balance to more of a parity situation. Skyhigh |
Co-Captains/ Professional Pilots
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 614451)
You can't have 2 CA's as the norm.... Someone is going to have to be the decision maker and someone has to only *think* they could do it better. You must have a chief and an indian, otherwise the chiefs just kill each other.
Skyhigh |
Originally Posted by SkyHigh
(Post 614875)
Plenty of companies operate with co-captains. If it is your leg you are the boss. We need to foster an environment of lifelong professional pilots.
You can easily have two captains in the cockpit but only one designated PIC... |
Originally Posted by N118NW
(Post 614484)
Not all of us care about money. Flying is my passion.
JJ |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands