![]() |
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 623109)
If it's at their current rates for CAL then yes. Branded is shuts down and still in the red.
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 623210)
XJT signed their contract in 2004 and CHQ in 2003?
XJT is working under a concessionary agreement. |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 623210)
XJT signed their contract in 2004 and CHQ in 2003?
During those contract negotiations XJT had all CAL Express lift, therefore having quite a bit of leverage not enjoyed by a contract lift provider? Also, during those contract negotiations XJT pilots weren't faced with the threat of their management forming a non-union, alter-ego airline with a separate seniority list to take some of their flying away? If its XJT Riddle-Diddles, don't even bother injecting common sense into the discussion. They won't know what to do. :D |
Originally Posted by Atreyu
(Post 623104)
Yup. They have so many RJ's sitting around not doing anything, they undercut the **** out of the other feeders. They're taking losses doing the flying, but not as much of a loss as those jets sitting around doing nothing
Even if XJT was doing the flying for $1 they are still one of the industry leading contracts for a regional, still not good pay, but they have among the best performance metrics in the business. And they are not taking a loss. You should read some financial filings every once in a while or an earnings call if you are going to pretend to know anything. But you are doing a great job at attempting to break up any unity the pilots inthis industry are trying to build. Good Luck |
Originally Posted by btwissel
(Post 623273)
yes, unfortunately. this board always degrades into a "my winky-wee is bigger than yours" shouting match.
and i saw a branded paint scheme express jet parked at A6 yesterday. bet they're enjoying the hell-hole that is UAX ground handling. Maybe I'm just used to/expect poor ground service, but I think ORD ground is pretty good. Or maybe you're talking about IAD, and I'm not awake yet. |
The basic answer is that United has contracted out ExpressJet Charter for a temporary agreement that basically spans the summer flying months. This flying is at negotiated rates well above that for the CPA flying, with the disadvantage being that it is just a short period of time.
Charter itself is doing very well, and had you been in Branded flying you would have seen an amazing level of customer satisfaction AND brand name loyalty. At today's fuel prices, Branded would have been doing very well. |
so basically, no one really knows what xjt is charging? :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by dojetdriver
Boiler, you missed the part where he talked about the pay cut.
I'm tired of telling people that as it falls on deaf ears, seems as if you've taken on the crusade. As they say, those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it... |
I have a question for a expressjet pilot: Is ORD and IAD being offered as a temporary base or do they commute you in for your trips?
|
You guys are missing the big picture. Right now it seems XJT is still seeing a loss with their CPA with CAL. If they were to be operating at the same rates for UAL, that’s just extra cash in their pocket. The planes being used for UAL are charter aircraft that aren’t being used right now. Even if they signed a deal with UAL using those planes, again, even if its the same deal they get from CAL, that’s just extra $$ because those planes are sitting around waiting to be utilized anyway. If they couldn't sign it because they had too much charter demand, that would be even better because charter pays way better. It’s a win win situation.
|
Originally Posted by seven6
(Post 623348)
I have a question for a expressjet pilot: Is ORD and IAD being offered as a temporary base or do they commute you in for your trips?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:40 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands