Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Express Jet Branded Planes in ORD (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/40759-express-jet-branded-planes-ord.html)

dojetdriver 06-05-2009 06:19 AM


Originally Posted by ToiletDuck (Post 623109)
If it's at their current rates for CAL then yes. Branded is shuts down and still in the red.

If branded is "shuts" down, how can branded still be in the red?


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 623210)
XJT signed their contract in 2004 and CHQ in 2003?

Boiler, you missed the part where he talked about the pay cut. Yep, contract signed in 04 with vastly different climates between the CHQ and XJT. Contract extended in 2006. Pay concessions in 2008, STILL under different circumstances. CHQ did pretty well on that CBA, we BOTH know that. I'm tired of telling people that as it falls on deaf ears, seems as if you've taken on the crusade.

XJT is working under a concessionary agreement.

RAHPilot5 06-05-2009 06:23 AM


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 623210)
XJT signed their contract in 2004 and CHQ in 2003?

During those contract negotiations XJT had all CAL Express lift, therefore having quite a bit of leverage not enjoyed by a contract lift provider?

Also, during those contract negotiations XJT pilots weren't faced with the threat of their management forming a non-union, alter-ego airline with a separate seniority list to take some of their flying away?

You have to use smaller words when dealing with XJTers Boiler.

If its XJT Riddle-Diddles, don't even bother injecting common sense into the discussion. They won't know what to do. :D

APM145 06-05-2009 06:41 AM


Originally Posted by Atreyu (Post 623104)
Yup. They have so many RJ's sitting around not doing anything, they undercut the **** out of the other feeders. They're taking losses doing the flying, but not as much of a loss as those jets sitting around doing nothing

Well, that was certainly spoken like someone who has no clue about this industry. You should at least research the topic a little before you make a comment.

Even if XJT was doing the flying for $1 they are still one of the industry leading contracts for a regional, still not good pay, but they have among the best performance metrics in the business. And they are not taking a loss. You should read some financial filings every once in a while or an earnings call if you are going to pretend to know anything.

But you are doing a great job at attempting to break up any unity the pilots inthis industry are trying to build.

Good Luck

wmupilot69 06-05-2009 06:51 AM


Originally Posted by btwissel (Post 623273)
yes, unfortunately. this board always degrades into a "my winky-wee is bigger than yours" shouting match.

and i saw a branded paint scheme express jet parked at A6 yesterday. bet they're enjoying the hell-hole that is UAX ground handling.


Maybe I'm just used to/expect poor ground service, but I think ORD ground is pretty good. Or maybe you're talking about IAD, and I'm not awake yet.

BrandedPilot 06-05-2009 06:58 AM

The basic answer is that United has contracted out ExpressJet Charter for a temporary agreement that basically spans the summer flying months. This flying is at negotiated rates well above that for the CPA flying, with the disadvantage being that it is just a short period of time.

Charter itself is doing very well, and had you been in Branded flying you would have seen an amazing level of customer satisfaction AND brand name loyalty. At today's fuel prices, Branded would have been doing very well.

Superpilot92 06-05-2009 07:05 AM

so basically, no one really knows what xjt is charging? :rolleyes:

BoilerUP 06-05-2009 07:29 AM


Originally Posted by dojetdriver
Boiler, you missed the part where he talked about the pay cut.

Nah I saw that...but one has to consider what basis those concessions were taken from. XJT payrates are concessionary yet better because they were taken from the 2004/2006 payrates; kinda like how ARW's CL65 payrates from the concessionary 2003 CBA were and are still near the top of the industry (because they were taken from the 2001 CBA which as you noted was built upon by ACA and CMR agreements).


I'm tired of telling people that as it falls on deaf ears, seems as if you've taken on the crusade.
I just hate the revisionist history of those claiming CHQ signed their CBA "for growth"; either through folks' malice or ignorance, it completely discounts the climate of Section 6 talks in 2003 and those gains that CHQ obtained in their agreement which is being so widely maligned here now in 2009.

As they say, those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it...

seven6 06-05-2009 07:33 AM

I have a question for a expressjet pilot: Is ORD and IAD being offered as a temporary base or do they commute you in for your trips?

JetBlast77 06-05-2009 07:35 AM

You guys are missing the big picture. Right now it seems XJT is still seeing a loss with their CPA with CAL. If they were to be operating at the same rates for UAL, that’s just extra cash in their pocket. The planes being used for UAL are charter aircraft that aren’t being used right now. Even if they signed a deal with UAL using those planes, again, even if its the same deal they get from CAL, that’s just extra $$ because those planes are sitting around waiting to be utilized anyway. If they couldn't sign it because they had too much charter demand, that would be even better because charter pays way better. It’s a win win situation.

Bond 06-05-2009 08:32 AM


Originally Posted by seven6 (Post 623348)
I have a question for a expressjet pilot: Is ORD and IAD being offered as a temporary base or do they commute you in for your trips?

CLE and EWR crews are covering the flying, with trips originating out of CLE and deadheads out of EWR.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:40 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands