Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Bombardier/Embraer Competitors >

Bombardier/Embraer Competitors

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Bombardier/Embraer Competitors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2009 | 08:51 PM
  #1  
winglet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Default Bombardier/Embraer Competitors

Mitsubishi MRJ

Sukhoi Superjet 100

ACAC ARJ-21

Last edited by winglet; 06-25-2009 at 09:03 PM.
Reply
Old 06-26-2009 | 03:47 AM
  #2  
BlueSkiesAhead's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: On the road
Default

Looks like a couple of E-jet's and a DC-9 to me.
Reply
Old 06-26-2009 | 05:26 AM
  #3  
Rightseat Ballast's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: E170/175 CA
Default

The Japanese aircraft too closely resembles the E-jet. Most companies will not want to go with an unknown replica over a known and proven aircraft.

The Russian aircraft will very likely not find a market in the US. Ever.

The Chinese jet will probably be popular throughout Asia and enjoy some limited success in Eastern Europe. However, like the Russian airframe, it will not find a market in the US.

The E-jet and larger CRJs are going to continue to be the staple of North American small jet fleets. When the C-series rolls out, it should do quite well, assuming the geared turbofans deliver the promised performance with great maintenance reliability.
Reply
Old 06-26-2009 | 05:38 AM
  #4  
Ftrooppilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 0
From: Body at sea level; heart at 70,000+
Default

90, 95 and 85 seats - built in defiance of most scope restrictions. They must expect a demand level.
Reply
Old 06-26-2009 | 05:38 AM
  #5  
Splanky's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Moving backwards
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
The Japanese aircraft too closely resembles the E-jet. Most companies will not want to go with an unknown replica over a known and proven aircraft.

The Russian aircraft will very likely not find a market in the US. Ever.

The Chinese jet will probably be popular throughout Asia and enjoy some limited success in Eastern Europe. However, like the Russian airframe, it will not find a market in the US.

The E-jet and larger CRJs are going to continue to be the staple of North American small jet fleets. When the C-series rolls out, it should do quite well, assuming the geared turbofans deliver the promised performance with great maintenance reliability.
I doubt the airlines see it as an unknown replica. They probably only care about the operating costs and support structure. So, if the Japanese version is appealing in these regards I would imagine at least a few airline will buy it. Except that being the first operator of an airplane is not always fun trying to get the kinks worked out.

Mitsubishi hasn't had many orders yet, but I would not count the Japanese companies out. That is what the big three auto manufacturers first did.

You are correct about the other two. With the Superjet, they have worked very hard to make the plane appealing to western companies, but I don't think they will have much luck.
Reply
Old 06-26-2009 | 05:59 AM
  #6  
UCLAbruins's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: F/O- G-V/550
Default

Few years back the thought of going to Brazil to buy airplanes seemed like plain insanity to me. But they've managed to build decent airplanes...

As far as regional jets, I think they're at the same level, Embraer might be jumping ahead of Bombardier with their 190s... But there is no comparison when it comes to corporate jets. Embraer will never be able to compete with Bombardier's Challenger and Global Express products....

actually can anybody compete with Bombardier's Biz Jets (besides Gulfstream obviously)???
Reply
Old 06-26-2009 | 09:21 AM
  #7  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 680
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

I have been following this for a while...

The Chinese airplane may not even get western certification...it was not designed from the ground up to specifically meet FAA requirements. It's capacity and performance is not sized to western RJ markets, but rather to a specific niche in China's domestic market. Also this airplane is essentially a "practice" airplane...China has reorganized their aviation industries (all government controlled) with the intent of ramping up to produce large airliners. This RJ is a first step to that end, they don't care whether they sell them in the US.

The Russian RJ is similar in that it is targeted at domestic markets...there is a shortage of good home-grown airliners in russia, and there has usually been a HUGE import penalty on Boeings and Arbii. It looks like it will get FAA certification (reciprocal based on euro certs), but I'm not sure it will be a strong competitor to bombardier and embraer.

As for the Mitsubishi...the design details are very exciting, they improve on many of the traditional RJ downfalls. It's safe to assume that the Japanese can make good on their intentions...expect to see these here in the US.
Reply
Old 07-03-2009 | 12:24 AM
  #8  
winglet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Default Q-400 Competition and Another RJ

I agree rickair7777. Here are a couple more attempts on the Bomba/Embraer market.

ATR -600 Series - ATR

"Antonov": AN-148
Reply
Old 07-03-2009 | 12:30 AM
  #9  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot
90, 95 and 85 seats - built in defiance of most scope restrictions. They must expect a demand level.
Yes, how dare they design planes for the world, and not just the US. Damm them all to h*ll .
Reply
Old 07-03-2009 | 12:58 AM
  #10  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

I suspect, also, that the Japanese plane has the highest likelihood to arrive in the US. Mitsibushi reps showed up at SKW and gave their sales pitch already. I'm told the guys really didn't speak english too well, but kept saying "see? better!!"

I notice that they didn't publish an empty weight. I didn't see anything so far that's any different than their competition. Whatever designers say on weight and fuel burn, I've yet to see a finished product that didn't burn more and weigh more than the original estimates.

So, like any new market entrant, a comparable product will have to compete on price. And that will sell in the US.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices