Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
First piece of Airline Legislation >

First piece of Airline Legislation

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

First piece of Airline Legislation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2009 | 01:51 PM
  #21  
OperatorError's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
And people choosing only to fly on a mainline carrier is aBad Thing? Did you ever stop to consider that the more people choose to fly the name brand might lead to MORE MAINLINE FLYING AND MORE MAINLINE JOBS?

(Sorry about the caps, but as you say, "People are retarded")
I don't disagree with you about trying to create mainline jobs. Truth of the matter is that the regionals airlines are here to stay. I doubt that United Airlines is interested in sending a 737 from Denver to Farmington, NM that only has 25 people aboard.
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 02:34 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OperatorError
I don't disagree with you about trying to create mainline jobs. Truth of the matter is that the regionals airlines are here to stay. I doubt that United Airlines is interested in sending a 737 from Denver to Farmington, NM that only has 25 people aboard.
Hmmm. In that case, maybe Farmington shouldn't be served at all since a half full RJ loses a lot of money on the flight. But I guess the commuter airline is fine with it because they get paid for every seat anyway.
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 02:38 PM
  #23  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
And people choosing only to fly on a mainline carrier is aBad Thing? Did you ever stop to consider that the more people choose to fly the name brand might lead to MORE MAINLINE FLYING AND MORE MAINLINE JOBS?

(Sorry about the caps, but as you say, "People are retarded")
This does not matter for 2 reasons

1) People do not have a "mainline" option for most places regionals fly. Look at you and Colgan. If someone wants to fly to CLL, LFT, AEX, ACT...etc they have 2 choices, a regional or drive.

2) If the city is served by mainline and a regional (XJet and CAL for example) people will always pick a flight that has the lowest cost and the flight the benefits their schedule best.

Almost every passenger would book on whatever gets them there the cheapest and in the shortest time...period!
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 02:47 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Default

completely worthless and we pay these morons with our tax money because???
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 03:22 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Default

Isn't this already a DOT or IATA requirement to list the operating carrier on the ticket?

Of course this law would really hurt priceline and hotwire where you buy without knowing what you're getting.
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 03:25 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Student Pilot
Default

totally do not understand how this protects the travelling public... if it is to shield them from dangerous regionals.... tell me which mainline has never had an accident? (i'm sure someone is going to name one, but you get my point. and even then you'd have to take into account how long they've been in business because it's not fair to compare a 5 year old airlinee without a single accident, as opposed to a 20 year airline with one accident.)
and, regionals do make up more than 50% of all the flying... so unless people are travelling from hub to hub, how would they plan on ever avoiding a regional aircraft? (and even hub to hub is often flown by regionals with larger aircraft like RAH.) i cant believe this chuck is serving my beloved home state, he could be spending his time on a gazillion other things that matter.
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 03:37 PM
  #27  
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 0
From: whale wrangler
Default

Originally Posted by OperatorError
They have Lynx, and if I'm remember right, Great Lakes does some routes for them.
Nice Avatar

JAPW
Ally
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 03:41 PM
  #28  
meeko031's Avatar
alchemist
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Default

the public will only care about how much they pay for the tickets!!! This lady on our flight decided to fly to dallas and connect in columbus from la guardia to save $20. We were delayed for weather and had to sit for 3hrs on the ground. Did she not only miss her connection, but she had to pay for her own hotel for the night. Just to save $20. awesome....
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 03:50 PM
  #29  
OperatorError's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by meeko031
the public will only care about how much they pay for the tickets!!! This lady on our flight decided to fly to dallas and connect in columbus from la guardia to save $20. We were delayed for weather and had to sit for 3hrs on the ground. Did she not only miss her connection, but she had to pay for her own hotel for the night. Just to save $20. awesome....

Ha Ha!!! I'll bet she brought her own trail mix on board too!
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 04:35 PM
  #30  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice
This does not matter for 2 reasons

1) People do not have a "mainline" option for most places regionals fly. Look at you and Colgan. If someone wants to fly to CLL, LFT, AEX, ACT...etc they have 2 choices, a regional or drive.

2) If the city is served by mainline and a regional (XJet and CAL for example) people will always pick a flight that has the lowest cost and the flight the benefits their schedule best.

Almost every passenger would book on whatever gets them there the cheapest and in the shortest time...period!
1. Agreed.
2. IAH to ATL on 7/28 has 10 non stop flights. All are $69 one way. Six of them are flown by CO, the other four are flown by two competing regionals. I would rather have two more 73s eliminating the RJs: fewer crews, but the remaining jobs are much better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Winged Wheeler
Hangar Talk
0
05-02-2009 04:50 AM
jsfBoat
Your Photos and Videos
2
01-25-2009 04:51 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices