Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   ASA is furloughing... it's official (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/41938-asa-furloughing-its-official.html)

sweptback 07-13-2009 04:44 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644337)
Remember that our best chance at one voice died with your new TA so that means the majority at ASA are just as guilty as the majority at SKW when the battle begins.

I don't follow. Are you saying that ASA pilots are solely responsible for pursuing one list? I think our best chance for one list failed with the resounding "no" vote from the SkyWest ALPA drive.

JoeyMeatballs 07-13-2009 04:47 PM


Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi (Post 644219)
Why should we furlough? We are actually a little short right now. So, we should furlough, just to make you feel better?



classy......................

JetJock16 07-13-2009 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by sweptback (Post 644364)
I don't follow. Are you saying that ASA pilots are solely responsible for pursuing one list? I think our best chance for one list failed with the resounding "no" vote from the SkyWest ALPA drive.

WOW, just what I expected. Here let me point out what you missed...............

Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644337)
............ so that means the majority at ASA are just as guilty as the majority at SKW when the battle begins.

For clarification I guess I should have said "equally responsible." Bottom line is that both pilot group majorities failed one another.

SpiraMirabilis 07-13-2009 05:08 PM

Skywest girl captain I know had a line for the first time in a long time. I think its the at risk flying

samuraiguytn 07-13-2009 05:08 PM

Being one of the new furloughies, I think it blows. The chief pilots did an excellent job in letting us know of the furlough. Then all of the memos came out from upper mngmnt. Which of course made me feel like a tool, not to mention that I worked for Tools.

As far as ASA verses SKW, When ever I taxi out behind one, I say im following company. HA. I also think that we should merge. IM about sick of ALPA. There constant taking of my money and doing what with it? Representing me? Yeah right!!! ALPA guys care about one thing....And thats ALPA guys. If a new guy has something to say thats important, they turn and say and I quote "you are new to this, You will understand when you gain some seniority."

Im not just mad that I am losing my job while I have a kid on the way, Im mad that my representation does nothing to protect me and My employer cares nothing but saving a short term penny to please an airline that is overly frugal. :mad::mad: Oh and to through another kick in the pants. I just dropped 200 bucks to keep my flight benefits for the next year two weeks ago. Guess who is out 200 Bucks.

SO my last few words of my rant are. Vote ALPA out and merge with SKW!!!

JetJock16 07-13-2009 05:11 PM


Originally Posted by SpiraMirabilis (Post 644381)
Skywest girl captain I know had a line for the first time in a long time. I think its the at risk flying

Yep, a buddy of mine who was hired at SKW in Oct 07 (RJ) just got his first line. He's never broken guarantee and now he will.

cubflyer 07-13-2009 05:15 PM




Click on APC Forums page and this advertisement comes up....Does this seem ironic to anyone????????????? Furlough the ASA guys and get cheap tickets on SKYW. HMMMMMMMMMMM?!?!??

sweptback 07-13-2009 05:30 PM


Originally Posted by samuraiguytn (Post 644383)
SO my last few words of my rant are. Vote ALPA out and merge with SKW!!!

I just don't understand why people think this. If ALPA was voted out of ASA, who would negotiate the merging of the lists? Hell, who would convince management that it would be a good idea?

All that would happen would be that ASA would be separated into the "good ASA" and the "bad ASA". The "good ASA" (70/90s) would be transferred to SkyWest, lowering their costs further by hiring new people, and all the senior ASA guys flying them would be out of a job. The "bad ASA" (50s) would be slowly bled down like Comair, taking advantage of any future 2-for-1 deals by moving the 900s to SKW and bleeding the 200s from ASA.

As for the $200 in travel fees, contest the charge with your credit card company. Explain that it was a required fee for your job, and now you are being laid off and the company will not refund it. You will get your money back, credit card companies are very pro-consumer when it comes to chargebacks.

sweptback 07-13-2009 05:38 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644377)
WOW, just what I expected. Here let me point out what you missed...............


For clarification I guess I should have said "equally responsible." Bottom line is that both pilot group majorities failed one another.

I still don't see why ASA pilots are "equally responsible." In our 2007 contract we negotiated scope provisions that, while not one list, keep what's ours ours. The fact that no further airplanes have been transferred between the companies shows that it has worked and that management is not willing to comply with our rules about aircraft transfers.

In fact, we negotiated scope for SkyWest pilots. If their airplanes are transferred to ASA, their pilots get to bid on coming over to our side and are integrated fairly. It also covers aircraft transfers to any yet-unknown SKW entities... which would have come into play had the XJT purchase gone through, or any future purchase down the road.

What scope has SkyWest ever negotiated for ASA pilots? All I remember was the big fat finger they gave us after the ALPA drive.

The fact that we were not able to achieve one list during our last negotiations was based more on an unfriendly NMB and an unfriendly management team. In fact, negotiating one list would most likely result in massive concessions (a la Eagle's 16 year contract) to get the deal done. After all the concessions were agreed to, guess who's contract the SkyWest pilots would be operating under?

In fact, if ASA and SkyWest were to merge right now, ASA would lose big time. We have about 10% of our list on furlough, and 65 captains that will be soon FOs again. Even if there was a DOH merge (which would never happen because it would favor ASA), furloughs would go to the bottom of the combined list, and the newly displaced captains would stay as FOs on the list.

So, it's a "be careful for what you wish for" scenario for sure.

JetJock16 07-13-2009 05:45 PM


Originally Posted by sweptback (Post 644408)
I still don't see why ASA pilots are "equally responsible." In our 2007 contract we negotiated scope provisions that, while not one list, keep what's ours ours. The fact that no further airplanes have been transferred between the companies shows that it has worked and that management is not willing to comply with our rules about aircraft transfers.

In fact, we negotiated scope for SkyWest pilots. If their airplanes are transferred to ASA, their pilots get to bid on coming over to our side and are integrated fairly. It also covers aircraft transfers to any yet-unknown SKW entities... which would have come into play had the XJT purchase gone through, or any future purchase down the road.

What scope has SkyWest ever negotiated for ASA pilots? All I remember was the big fat finger they gave us after the ALPA drive.

The fact that we were not able to achieve one list during our last negotiations was based more on an unfriendly NMB and an unfriendly management team. In fact, negotiating one list would most likely result in massive concessions (a la Eagle's 16 year contract) to get the deal done. After all the concessions were agreed to, guess who's contract the SkyWest pilots would be operating under?

In fact, if ASA and SkyWest were to merge right now, ASA would lose big time. We have about 10% of our list on furlough, and 65 captains that will be soon FOs again. Even if there was a DOH merge (which would never happen because it would favor ASA), furloughs would go to the bottom of the combined list, and the newly displaced captains would stay as FOs on the list.

So, it's a "be careful for what you wish for" scenario for sure.

You're talking scope.................I'm talking whipsaw. Did you or did you not have merger language when SKW purchased you? Regardless of the NMB, your 07 TA was passed by the majority thus allowing SKW and ASA to remain separate. ASA's pilots aren't "solely" responsible because 65% of SKW pilots voted down ALPA thus stoping the merger from our end. In short I’m saying that we are where we are because of the shortsightedness of the majority at both airlines.

I'll give the scope issue to you. As for the “massive concessions” part, believe what you want but they played the game and won by buying you out.

samuraiguytn 07-13-2009 06:04 PM

I never really thought about how the process of the merger would go about. Good point/s.

It still seems that SkyWest would still offer at least some temporary gigs for us if they are really short. Sounds good on paper at least.

JetJock16 07-13-2009 06:29 PM


Originally Posted by samuraiguytn (Post 644424)
I never really thought about how the process of the merger would go about. Good point/s.

It still seems that SkyWest would still offer at least some temporary gigs for us if they are really short. Sounds good on paper at least.

No, if you moved over to the SKW side you'll give up all rights to an ASA seniority number, it's a cost issue. You will keep DOH for benefits but that's it.

Currently I understand the pecking order for a SKW new hire class is as follows:

1. UAL furloughees
2. ASA furloughees
3. Poolies
4. Interviewees

JetJock16 07-13-2009 06:47 PM


Originally Posted by JustAnotherPLT (Post 644135)
It's good to see our Union is really stepping in. (Sarcasm!)

And what are they suppose to do? Better yet what can they do? In other words, has ASA violated your contract with these furloughs?

Didn't think so..........so how can a union legally hold the company to something you never agreed too? The pilots being furloughed have no furlough protection, right? Now if ASA furloughs protected pilots and ALPA does nothing then you can repost the above and I’ll agree with you. Until then all your union can do is wish you the best.

cubflyer 07-13-2009 06:51 PM

A fitting video based on the circumstances I'm facing.........
YouTube - Office Space - Move You Downstairs

sweptback 07-13-2009 06:54 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644413)
You're talking scope.................I'm talking whipsaw. Did you or did you not have merger language when SKW purchased you?

We did, but it covered a purchase by another airline with the intent to merge. SKYW, Inc. did not intend to merge the airlines and altered their corporate structure to not trigger that clause in our contract.

Very few airlines have a merger clause that will force an instant merger -- XJT and RAH are the two that I think off off hand. XJT had willing management that agreed to that language, and RAH gave up a lot in their 03 contract to get the language (they have terrible workrules compared to the rest of the industry).


Regardless of the NMB, your 07 TA was passed by the majority thus allowing SKW and ASA to remain separate. ASA's pilots aren't "solely" responsible because 65% of SKW pilots voted down ALPA thus stoping the merger from our end. In short I’m saying that we are where we are because of the shortsightedness of the majority at both airlines.
Our 07 contract (it is no longer a TA once it is ratified by the pilot group) did not cure cancer either. So I guess ASA pilots are responsible for that too?

With a more favorable NMB, one list may be possible this go around. However, everything comes at a price. What are you willing to give up to get it?


I'll give the scope issue to you. As for the “massive concessions” part, believe what you want but they played the game and won by buying you out.
I never said that the SKYW, Inc. purchase was a bad thing for us. I think you would only have to look at Comair to see where we would have been.

However, remember it's the same people that own us that own you. Right now we're getting shafted, but for the whipsaw to continue to work, one airline can't just be taking it in the shorts forever.

Gunga Galunga 07-13-2009 07:06 PM

Why didn't the company offer leaves and early outs before furloughing to try and mitigate the number.

Just Another Shrinking Airline

JetJock16 07-13-2009 07:37 PM


Originally Posted by sweptback (Post 644462)
We did, but it covered a purchase by another airline with the intent to merge. SKYW, Inc. did not intend to merge the airlines and altered their corporate structure to not trigger that clause in our contract.

Yes, SKW went the extra mile to keep us serparate.


Originally Posted by sweptback (Post 644462)
Our 07 contract (it is no longer a TA once it is ratified by the pilot group) did not cure cancer either. So I guess ASA pilots are responsible for that too?

What? You guys couldn't cure cancer? Bunch of slackers you are. :D

As for the TA, yeah I meant 07 contract…….it’s late.


Originally Posted by sweptback (Post 644462)
However, remember it's the same people that own us that own you. Right now we're getting shafted, but for the whipsaw to continue to work, one airline can't just be taking it in the shorts forever.

Couldn't agree more and I tell that to every FO I fly with. Unfortunately many can't see past the nose on their face.

Good night.

Nevets 07-13-2009 08:30 PM


Originally Posted by surreal1221 (Post 644186)
But, we're not alone in this mess - every DCI company is getting slapped around like a little girl.

How badly is Skywest being hit compared to ASA?


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644232)
Remember UAL covers the overwhelming majority of our flying and our DAL reductions have been somewhat offset by our increases in UAL flying and Pro-rate flying.

I though the majority of your block hours came from DAL? Also, if SKW is doing pro-rate with the 120s and the CRJ200s, why are they not also trying that with the excess ASA aircraft?


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644290)
I agree and we’ll just have to see what the future holds. Remember that once the purchase of ASA was complete they didn’t give ASA the boot in SLC for some time. Also remember that 5 of our CR9's are ATL based so in order to give ASA all the ATL CR9 flying Mgmnt would have to transfer. Unfortunately I agree with ASA pilot’s perception that they are step children so I don’t see the transfer happening.

They could transfer and ASA's contract would protect the Skywest pilots in that instance.


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644337)
But you're right, we will be whipsawed against one another but the boat sailed on merging when Jerry and friends bought you guys out of your language. Of course when the time comes ASA pilots will point their fingers at SKW pilots because we're non-union, claiming we're the reason for this cluster. Remember that our best chance at one voice died with your new TA so that means the majority at ASA are just as guilty as the majority at SKW when the battle begins.

The difference is that ASA made gains in their vote (which Skywest pilots also benefit from). Skywest pilots gained nothing in their union vote.


Originally Posted by samuraiguytn (Post 644383)
IM about sick of ALPA. There constant taking of my money and doing what with it? Representing me? Yeah right!!! ALPA guys care about one thing....And thats ALPA guys. If a new guy has something to say thats important, they turn and say and I quote "you are new to this, You will understand when you gain some seniority."

Vote ALPA out and merge with SKW!!!

How would voting ALPA cause a merger? Even it you went independent, it would be status quo as far as merging goes. Lets think rationally before doing things that don't make sense. I know you just got really bad news so its expected. But don't go the same path that US Air east guys went when they got their bad news. If you don't like the leadership in ALPA, recall them and vote in new ones...its easier than decertifying anyways.;)


Originally Posted by sweptback (Post 644408)
I still don't see why ASA pilots are "equally responsible." In our 2007 contract we negotiated scope provisions that, while not one list, keep what's ours ours. The fact that no further airplanes have been transferred between the companies shows that it has worked and that management is not willing to comply with our rules about aircraft transfers.

As a side note, JA himself said that that language is the reason why they wouldn't transfer aircraft.


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644413)
You're talking scope.................I'm talking whipsaw. Did you or did you not have merger language when SKW purchased you? Regardless of the NMB, your 07 TA was passed by the majority thus allowing SKW and ASA to remain separate. ASA's pilots aren't "solely" responsible because 65% of SKW pilots voted down ALPA thus stoping the merger from our end. In short I’m saying that we are where we are because of the shortsightedness of the majority at both airlines.

I'll give the scope issue to you. As for the “massive concessions” part, believe what you want but they played the game and won by buying you out.

Lack of scope is whipsaw!!!

The ASA contract, like any contract, is a comprimise between two entities. Both entities were willing to trade certain things for others while getting something else in return. The SKW union vote was just a surrender.

somertime32 07-13-2009 09:23 PM

well....at least we have the option of coming over to Skywest if they start hiring again before ASA recalls...that's not a bad deal....it's really the only positive thing I have to look forward to, well that and college footballl starting soon :D

ehaeckercfi 07-13-2009 09:24 PM


Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs (Post 644367)
classy......................

Just stating the obvious.

JetJock16 07-14-2009 04:18 AM


Originally Posted by Nevets (Post 644528)
How badly is Skywest being hit compared to ASA?


I though the majority of your block hours came from DAL? Also, if SKW is doing pro-rate with the 120s and the CRJ200s, why are they not also trying that with the excess ASA aircraft?


About 33%-35% of SKW flying is DAL with a portion of that being Pro-Rate. We've seen a drop in ATL flying of 30% and a drop in SLC flying of about 20%.

That's pretty much on par with ASA but because of UAL we've been able to squeeze by.


Originally Posted by Nevets (Post 644528)
The difference is that ASA made gains in their vote (which Skywest pilots also benefit from). Skywest pilots gained nothing in their union vote.

I'm pro-ALPA and I still disagree with this statement.

Truman_Sparks 07-14-2009 06:27 AM

Just wait until the 20 airframes depart ASA. That will trigger 100 more furloughs and 100 more downgrades. If the industry and economy are so bad, why would anyone think ASA would be keeping those 20 planes?

Banshee365 07-14-2009 07:07 AM


Originally Posted by Truman_Sparks (Post 644647)
Just wait until the 20 airframes depart ASA. That will trigger 100 more furloughs and 100 more downgrades. If the industry and economy are so bad, why would anyone think ASA would be keeping those 20 planes?


So you're banking on ASA breaking the contract?

gtechpilot 07-14-2009 07:29 AM


Originally Posted by Banshee365 (Post 644662)
So you're banking on ASA breaking the contract?

Considering the number of red-arrow days (25+ per month when only 4 are allowed), no one should be surprised if ASA tries.

NuGuy 07-14-2009 08:02 AM

Heyas,

PMFJI, but he long term plan for DAL is to shrink down and attrit the 50 seaters down to a 50-70 number to serve nitch markets, very similar to what the remnants of PDT/ALG is doing for LCC. Larger aircraft are near the cap. I've heard that DAL management say that overall RJ flying(of all sizes) is still too big by about a 3rd, and doesn't fit with "the brand" (whatever that means).

While I feel bad for the furloughees, the days of fungal like growth at the scooters are over...

Nu

FlyASA 07-14-2009 08:19 AM


Originally Posted by NuGuy (Post 644688)
Heyas,

PMFJI, but he long term plan for DAL is to shrink down and attrit the 50 seaters down to a 50-70 number to serve nitch markets, very similar to what the remnants of PDT/ALG is doing for LCC. Larger aircraft are near the cap. I've heard that DAL management say that overall RJ flying(of all sizes) is still too big by about a 3rd, and doesn't fit with "the brand" (whatever that means).

While I feel bad for the furloughees, the days of fungal like growth at the scooters are over...

Nu

Good, I'd rather see the regionals shrink and see mainline recapture the flying. I'd rather sit out on the street for an extra 3 years flight instructing and working another job then get back sooner and be stuck at a regional for the rest of my life.

When does ASA's contract expire with DAL? Isn't it 2014 or something like that? Whenever that contract expires is when things will get really messy. I wouldn't be surprised if all the -200s disappear and we only fly the -700s and -900s for Delta. We could lose all of the 70+ seater RJs too or see it transferred to Skywest, who knows.

Anyone want to start some kind of pool for recall? I'd say recall in time for the 2012 summer travel season.

Intl Jumper 07-14-2009 08:20 AM

Does anyone think ASA will furlough into the contract when they are forced to park the 20-200's in the spring? I was talking with the ALPA guys in the lounge yesterday at the town hall meeting and they said the company would have to declare bankruptcy or lose their operating certificate, be grounded by the government for the company to be able to furlough into the protected pilots...The company has been pretty good about honoring the contract, minus crew scheduling...

FlyASA 07-14-2009 08:36 AM


Originally Posted by Intl Jumper (Post 644696)
Does anyone think ASA will furlough into the contract when they are forced to park the 20-200's in the spring? I was talking with the ALPA guys in the lounge yesterday at the town hall meeting and they said the company would have to declare bankruptcy or lose their operating certificate, be grounded by the government for the company to be able to furlough into the protected pilots...The company has been pretty good about honoring the contract, minus crew scheduling...

I wouldn't count on anything, a clever enough lawyer will figure out a way around that clause to benefit the company. Hopefully it doesn't get to the point they need to furlough more, but who knows.

jth029 07-14-2009 08:37 AM


Originally Posted by gtechpilot (Post 644675)
Considering the number of red-arrow days (25+ per month when only 4 are allowed), no one should be surprised if ASA tries.

I'm not 100% sure but I think the language is the contract is grey there. There is a difference between a restricted day and a red arrow day.

gtechpilot 07-14-2009 09:03 AM


Originally Posted by jth029 (Post 644703)
I'm not 100% sure but I think the language is the contract is grey there. There is a difference between a restricted day and a red arrow day.

You are correct sir! The problem is that the company has created a method to get around the contract in this area but using 'red arrows' and not declaring them restricted. Not saying they can or will, but if the company wants to furlough again, they will find a way to do it.

JetJock16 07-14-2009 09:25 AM


Originally Posted by FlyASA (Post 644695)
Good, I'd rather see the regionals shrink and see mainline recapture the flying. I'd rather sit out on the street for an extra 3 years flight instructing and working another job then get back sooner and be stuck at a regional for the rest of my life.

I couldn’t agree more.

Originally Posted by FlyASA (Post 644695)
When does ASA's contract expire with DAL? Isn't it 2014 or something like that? Whenever that contract expires is when things will get really messy. I wouldn't be surprised if all the -200s disappear and we only fly the -700s and -900s for Delta. We could lose all of the 70+ seater RJs too or see it transferred to SkyWest, who knows.

The ASA purchase agreement between DAL and SKYW Inc back in October 05 added 5 years to our current CPA pushing both airlines contracts out for a total of 15 years………..or 2020. Yes there are loop holes but every contract has them. Keep in mind that every time DAL and SKYW Inc agree to an amendment the new subsections have their own time frames. (Ex. Swapping 20 CR2’s for 10 CR9’s)

SkyWest Airlines

Quote:
“Through this acquisition, our company will enter into long-term agreements with initial terms of 15 years with Delta at both ASA and SkyWest Airlines, making SkyWest the most significant regional relationship in the Delta Connection program.”


Originally Posted by FlyASA (Post 644695)
Anyone want to start some kind of pool for recall? I'd say recall in time for the 2012 summer travel season.

I think that’s very realistic. Unless SKW benefits from more UAL flying, then I’d expect there to an opportunity for ASA furloughees to cross over to the dark side.:D

Nevets 07-14-2009 09:29 AM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644585)
About 33%-35% of SKW flying is DAL with a portion of that being Pro-Rate. We've seen a drop in ATL flying of 30% and a drop in SLC flying of about 20%.

That's pretty much on par with ASA but because of UAL we've been able to squeeze by.

I wonder why they don't use some of the excess ASA aircraft for pro-rate flying?


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644585)
I'm pro-ALPA and I still disagree with this statement.

I know you are pro-ALPA and one of the good guys. But it is fact that there were gains made in ASA's contract. What gains did Skywest make from their last union vote? That's the difference.

JetJock16 07-14-2009 09:35 AM


Originally Posted by Nevets (Post 644743)
I wonder why they don't use some of the excess ASA aircraft for pro-rate flying?

I don't know but I'm starting to see a real double standard.


Originally Posted by Nevets (Post 644743)
I know you are pro-ALPA and one of the good guys. But it is fact that there were gains made in ASA's contract. What gains did Skywest make from their last union vote? That's the difference.

The gains were like intangibles that didn't benefit anyone but SKW pilots (We spell TEAM....."i"-Tea"m-e"). Remember that we haven’t furloughed yet and the company seems to be more willing to take risks with our pilot group in an effort to keep moral high and remain non-union/Pro-Jerry. Once again, a double standard.

FlyASA 07-14-2009 09:39 AM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 644740)
I think that’s very realistic. Unless SKW benefits from more UAL flying, then I’d expect there to an opportunity for ASA furloughees to cross over to the dark side.:D

I don't see it as the "dark side," I'd work for Skywest if given the chance. I have many friends over there and I don't wish anything bad on them.

Skywest at least has domiciles besides ATL, if I had know how much that place sucked I never would have taken the job with ASA. Sherman did everyone a favor when he burned that place down :D

(Better go hide for awhile before the die-hard southerners catch me :eek:)

berge7f9 07-14-2009 09:45 AM

Trying to blame Skywest or Delta or ALPA politics is not the way to go. We all know the economy is not getting better right now Everyone that came into this industry after 9/11 ought to know how much it is lacking in job security before they forked out all that money for flight school. This career now has the job security of a professional athlete, instead of a 6-term U.S. senator. Everybody has to have a backup plan, side job, or any other creative way to make a living outside of aviation. If you do not, you ought to pickup "150 Best Recession Proof Jobs" by Laurence Shatkin and start looking for a backup plan.

AirWillie 07-14-2009 10:07 AM

That sucks. I remember I got a call from the ASA recruiter but I never went because I heard of the long reserve times.

250 or point 65 07-14-2009 10:09 AM


Originally Posted by AirWillie (Post 644775)
That sucks. I remember I got a call from the ASA recruiter but I never went because I heard of the long reserve times.

How's the reserve time at GoJet? Sounds like you made the right decision!

Gunga Galunga 07-14-2009 10:36 AM

there goes the thread!

freezingflyboy 07-14-2009 10:36 AM

My favorite part of reading this thread has been all the AllATPs "Airline Career Fast Track Program" ads splattered around the borders. "Hey kids! In 90 days you TOO can be collecting unemployment like a REAL AIRLINE pilot!". :rolleyes:

This quote from our resident GooJet cheerleader also made me laugh.


Originally Posted by AirWillie (Post 644775)
That sucks. I remember I got a call from the ASA recruiter but I never went because I heard of the long reserve times.


vagabond 07-14-2009 10:44 AM

Mod note:

Looks like another United Nations post - a little flamebait, a little thread drift, a little of everything.

Try to stay on track, eh? Or I'm going to have to agree with Gunga Galunga (whatever kind of name is that?? ;)) Don't make me give out infractions; I really don't like to do that.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands