![]() |
oh this is just great ...ughhh these DCI rumors keep getting better and better.
|
Originally Posted by ebl14
(Post 647487)
DCI flying is going to go where it always has gone, to the lowest bidder. You guys should know that by now. End of discussion.
|
Pretty sure DCI guys can get as many Q400 as they want. Nothing prevents that. However that will never happen. That rumor has been around for soooo long. The rj700 rumor is actually possible.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 647432)
That's a cute one but I believe DAL scope prevents it. The Q400 is too heavy. I'll have to check.
Here is what Bombardier has published for Q400 weight specs for the high gross weight version: Weights: High Gross Weight Version (HGW) Maximum takeoff weight 64,500 lb 29,257 kg Maximum landing weight 61,750 lb 28,009 kg Maximum zero fuel weight 57,000 lb 25,855 kg Operating weight empty 37,888 lb 17,185 kg Maximum payload 19,112 lb 8,670 kg |
Originally Posted by ebl14
(Post 647487)
DCI flying is going to go where it always has gone, to the lowest bidder. You guys should know that by now. End of discussion.
|
Originally Posted by H46Bubba
(Post 647547)
It's less than a CRJ-700. At what weight(max gross or empty) is the limit as far as DL's scope is concerned?
Here is what Bombardier has published for Q400 weight specs for the high gross weight version: Weights: High Gross Weight Version (HGW) Maximum takeoff weight 64,500 lb 29,257 kg Maximum landing weight 61,750 lb 28,009 kg Maximum zero fuel weight 57,000 lb 25,855 kg Operating weight empty 37,888 lb 17,185 kg Maximum payload 19,112 lb 8,670 kg Yes, you are right. However, Delta pilot's Scope caps the MGTOW of a Turbo Prop LOWER then a 70/76 seat RJ. I'm checking on it. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 647271)
Most airline hiring practices are driven by results. I know at my airline they look at how the pilots they hire perform in training and on the line. They use that feedback to craft what they seek when they hire. In the last round we had far more extra training then in the last 30 years so perhaps in the next round the standards will change.
There is one last part left out by most pilots in the hiring equation. Majors understand they are hiring both a pilot and a manager. They look at the side of the equation also. Do well in college in a real major at a good school. It makes a big difference. Get some management experience outside avaition if possible. It makes a difference! It might help to analyze this if you could indicate the skills what skills are needed for a major airline pilot that are not needed for a regional airline pilot. |
Originally Posted by cfitstew
(Post 647469)
Great post. I want to see all of these regioanls shrink. I don't want to spend my entire career at one of these crappy companies, and the more flying that goes back to mainline the better it will be for all of us in the long run. Personally, I feel you are a fool if you plan to make a career at a regional. I swear some of us can't see the forrest for the trees.
|
Originally Posted by thrustsetrj200
(Post 647236)
I don't want to live like my parents or my grandparents or learn like they did. I want a better life and I won't complain if I don't get to go through the same experiences they did.
TANSTAAFL........ |
Originally Posted by laserman2431
(Post 647577)
That sounds like a good idea. How can we make the regional flying go back to the mainlines?
|
Originally Posted by saxman66
(Post 647430)
Here's another rumor I heard from a Mesaba guy. They decided against giving Comair's 700's to Mesaba, but now they are going to trade 1 for 1 a Mesaba 200 for a Q400. You heard it here first!
Or replace 200's with new TP's, get rid of the Saabs, then furlough all the excess pilots? Either one sounds stupid enough to believe. |
If the Q400 does in fact violate delta scope. By being too heavy of a turboprop. I could see DALPA using this as a bargaining tool to get Embraers or CRJ-900s back to mainline.
The Q400 is such a comfortable and efficient airplane I wouldn't be surprised if this is what is holding back the orders right now. How would everyone at the DCI's feel about a 1 for 1 swap, Q400 for their large RJs? |
Originally Posted by Coehill
(Post 647711)
If the Q400 does in fact violate delta scope. By being too heavy of a turboprop. I could see DALPA using this as a bargaining tool to get Embraers or CRJ-900s back to mainline.
The Q400 is such a comfortable and efficient airplane I wouldn't be surprised if this is what is holding back the orders right now. How would everyone at the DCI's feel about a 1 for 1 swap, Q400 for their large RJs? |
Originally Posted by Coehill
(Post 647711)
If the Q400 does in fact violate delta scope. By being too heavy of a turboprop. I could see DALPA using this as a bargaining tool to get Embraers or CRJ-900s back to mainline.
The Q400 is such a comfortable and efficient airplane I wouldn't be surprised if this is what is holding back the orders right now. How would everyone at the DCI's feel about a 1 for 1 swap, Q400 for their large RJs? I say this as a regional guy who would get totally screwed by this type of growth at the majors and cuts at the regionals. I'd rather stay flight instructing or flying night cargo for a few extra years than get recalled by my regional. If I'm going to "pay my dues," I'd rather do it flight instructing or 135 night cargo flying than fly at the regionals. At least in that way I would have the possibility of a good career at the majors instead of a lousy/mediocre one that it looks like I'll be having at the regionals. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 647271)
In the last round we had far more extra training then in the last 30 years so perhaps in the next round the standards will change.
|
Originally Posted by Dash8widget
(Post 647770)
I'm sure that this had nothing to do with new hires going into a training program that had never had to deal with new hires before - and one that just happens to be the most diverse and complex operation in the airline.:rolleyes:
It mostly had to do with attitude, not ability. |
Originally Posted by FlyASA
(Post 647757)
As unrealistitc as it is I'd say DALPA try and force a 2-1 swap. 2 RJs of any size going to mainline for 1 Q400 going to the regionals. Let the Q-400s and the current trubo props fly truly regional routes instead of ATL-CVG or ATL-MDW etc. Grow the higher paying mainline jobs and crush the regional growth.
I say this as a regional guy who would get totally screwed by this type of growth at the majors and cuts at the regionals. I'd rather stay flight instructing or flying night cargo for a few extra years than get recalled by my regional. If I'm going to "pay my dues," I'd rather do it flight instructing or 135 night cargo flying than fly at the regionals. At least in that way I would have the possibility of a good career at the majors instead of a lousy/mediocre one that it looks like I'll be having at the regionals. Sad but true |
:mad:The bottom line is that an airline is a business and the only thing in this day and age that matters in business is the bottom line; and that is $$$$$. Major Airline pilots will never get back the scope they have already given up without having to give back something major in return. And for all those guys on the seniority list that have no worries of loosing their jobs or position will never do it. They will look out for themselves first always. It has been proven over and over again. The union will never get the vote and management will never put something on the table that is going to cost them more money. So for all you guys out there who keep apologizing because you fly for a regional STOP!!! You did not create this situation, people way older and supposedly way wiser have created this monster that we now know today. The regional pilot did not choose to operate E-170’s E-190’s or CRJ 900’s. The regional pilot did not make the decision to fly from ATL-CVG, or MEM-PHX; Major Airline management made that decision and their unions signed off on it to save themself from what ever impending doom was to come. Honestly a good number of Regional pilots out there today started at these airlines when they only operated small turbo props. In the end the Majors will keep using regional’s and as long as big daddy keeps giving up scope regional airlines will continue to grow; and as long as they are around they will bid one another against eachother for the lowest price. You want to see something change it is going to have to start at the top.
|
Originally Posted by BE24pilot
(Post 647878)
:mad:The bottom line is that an airline is a business and the only thing in this day and age that matters in business is the bottom line; and that is $$$$$. Major Airline pilots will never get back the scope they have already given up without having to give back something major in return. And for all those guys on the seniority list that have no worries of loosing their jobs or position will never do it. They will look out for themselves first always. It has been proven over and over again. The union will never get the vote and management will never put something on the table that is going to cost them more money. So for all you guys out there who keep apologizing because you fly for a regional STOP!!! You did not create this situation, people way older and supposedly way wiser have created this monster that we now know today. The regional pilot did not choose to operate E-170’s E-190’s or CRJ 900’s. The regional pilot did not make the decision to fly from ATL-CVG, or MEM-PHX; Major Airline management made that decision and their unions signed off on it to save themself from what ever impending doom was to come. Honestly a good number of Regional pilots out there today started at these airlines when they only operated small turbo props. In the end the Majors will keep using regional’s and as long as big daddy keeps giving up scope regional airlines will continue to grow; and as long as they are around they will bid one another against eachother for the lowest price. You want to see something change it is going to have to start at the top.
|
Originally Posted by spank
(Post 647931)
what he said...
.. |
Originally Posted by laserman2431
(Post 647577)
That sounds like a good idea. How can we make the regional flying go back to the mainlines?
|
Originally Posted by SPDBOILER
(Post 647990)
News flash...you can't. That ship has set sail. Mainline pilots have opened their scope and no one is going to put that genie back in the bottle.
|
Originally Posted by laserman2431
(Post 648141)
Right. That's my point. It would be nice if we could, but, we can't.
Someone will probably start a new regional, etc. if we try to do it too quickly with MESABA/PNCL/MESA type contract going from bottom to the top, but if we turn up the heat slowly, I think we can do it. |
Well, that is actually happening right now. Too many people have decided to make the regionals their career. What this has done is make the regionals quite expensive. If this continues you will continue to see the demand for their party operators diminish.
Just watch what happens over the next three years and then the next 11. It is in effect why I would never make a regional my destination. |
If you want to make a change do something. This is a backstabbing dying industry. We are a educated group destroyed by what was...should have been...should be stories.
Change is ridding ourselves of ALPA. No associations. Give me a union. One that will buck the trend. I've had several jobs, from Teamsters in a feed mill to military to the facade that is ALPA. If you want this industry to return, action will be required. Prater is a joke. He cowers before DAL and knows the dynasty can crumble. Our leadership are not workers. They poorly defend us and wow, now for almost a decade we have been buying the let's take it back mantra. We are now part of an association run by buddy's, homer's and jokers. Richard Anderson is pulling all of our strings....But we know better....Right. If we are serious, we would really "Take it back." |
Originally Posted by downinthegroove
(Post 648417)
If you want to make a change do something. This is a backstabbing dying industry. We are a educated group destroyed by what was...should have been...should be stories.
Change is ridding ourselves of ALPA. No associations. Give me a union. One that will buck the trend. I've had several jobs, from Teamsters in a feed mill to military to the facade that is ALPA. If you want this industry to return, action will be required. Prater is a joke. He cowers before DAL and knows the dynasty can crumble. Our leadership are not workers. They poorly defend us and wow, now for almost a decade we have been buying the let's take it back mantra. We are now part of an association run by buddy's, homer's and jokers. Richard Anderson is pulling all of our strings....But we know better....Right. If we are serious, we would really "Take it back." The last thing the DCI pilots want is for the Delta pilots to form thier own union. If that happened then you would see the Delta pilots treat you much like the AA pilots treat Eagle. With ALPA, at least you still have DFR. |
Acl65pilot - would you get off this blame band wagon of "too many people making regionals their career." There are TONS of us who were unable to take advantage of the last mainline hiring boom. Not everyone was as lucky as you to time it perfectly.
For some guys it just wouldn't be wise to make the move, wether they are too old or too comfortable. Some regional carriers can actually be comfortable places to retire. I'm not saying I want to, or the majority want to, but there are a few whose mainline flying aspirations died a long time ago. Or for me personally, couldn't take advantage because I was an FO for 6 years, building TONS of invaluable SIC time. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 648324)
Well, that is actually happening right now. Too many people have decided to make the regionals their career. What this has done is make the regionals quite expensive. If this continues you will continue to see the demand for their party operators diminish.
Just watch what happens over the next three years and then the next 11. It is in effect why I would never make a regional my destination. Contraction takes time but the regionals are shrinking. |
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 648431)
If that happened then you would see the Delta pilots treat you much like the AA pilots treat Eagle. With ALPA, at least you still have DFR.
|
Originally Posted by bored
(Post 648464)
Acl65pilot - would you get off this blame band wagon of "too many people making regionals their career." There are TONS of us who were unable to take advantage of the last mainline hiring boom. Not everyone was as lucky as you to time it perfectly.
For some guys it just wouldn't be wise to make the move, wether they are too old or too comfortable. Some regional carriers can actually be comfortable places to retire. I'm not saying I want to, or the majority want to, but there are a few whose mainline flying aspirations died a long time ago. |
Originally Posted by SPDBOILER
(Post 647990)
News flash...you can't. That ship has set sail. Mainline pilots have opened their scope and no one is going to put that genie back in the bottle.
What makes it possible is the inherent short-sightedness of modern managers...they will take a small gain today without regard to the future long-term consequences. They will let whoever is CEO in 2020 worry about that. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands