Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Special Magenta Line - Colgan Crash >

Special Magenta Line - Colgan Crash

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Special Magenta Line - Colgan Crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2009 | 09:53 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: New Hire
Default

Originally Posted by SpiraMirabilis
Sometimes its taken, like in bankruptcy.

Not in Continental's case. And in any case no one seems to be in a rush to get it back. Lining pockets has a higher priority.
Reply
Old 09-07-2009 | 10:35 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default So sad...

Originally Posted by CAL EWR
Today is Sunday, September 6, 2009 and this is a Special Edition of The Magenta Line. There is 1 item for discussion.





Item 1: Note to Management: If You Lie Down With Dogs…



In a devastating article appearing in today’s Buffalo News, the management of Colgan Air, the operator of Continental Connection 3407 which crashed in Buffalo on February 12th of this year, has been unmasked as a strong proponent of the “beatings will continue until morale improves” philosophy of airline operation.



While many of us are well aware of just what our fellow ALPA pilots at Colgan have been dealing with the past few years, it is because of our relationship with them as a Continental Connection carrier that what is done to them is done to us as well—and to our customers.



The article in The Buffalo News reads like a recounting of third-world sweatshop working conditions: the professional pilots of Colgan Air are harangued for their use of sick leave, threatened with termination for too many sick calls within a year, forced to provide doctors notes for routine illnesses—and browbeaten into flying tired; and sick and tired are exactly what Captain Marvin Renslow and First Officer Rebecca Shaw were before they left Newark for Buffalo last February 12th.



The Buffalo accident put Continental Airlines management at a crossroads—the warning sign said “Cliff Ahead! Turn Now!”, but our management has continued to drive straight ahead anyway. As management has shown us over and over, their sole concern is the bottom line—but, as is often the case, the bottom line has sharp teeth—and it can bite.



We, the professional pilots of Continental Airlines, have watched the former quality of our Continental Airlines brand disappear—just as our own mainline flying has disappeared to a multitude of Continental Connection “partners” like Gulfstream International. With each new downgrade, the managements we dealt with became seedier and seedier. We ate breakfast at Tiffany’s, lunch at Burger King, and dinner at the rescue mission. The only constant in this uncontrolled descent was the professionalism of the pilots of our Connection partners. Regardless of the ruthlessness of their respective management teams, the pilots, no matter the airline, were the one bright constant. We all, from Continental to Colgan, meet the same high standards; it’s management who feeds at ever-lower bottoms of the trough.



The Buffalo News article can be found here:

Colgan pilots say many felt pressure to work while ill : Home: The Buffalo News



Colgan pilots say many felt pressure to work while ill



While you read it, think about what is happening in our own Newark pilot base: we have been cut to about 1800 pilots—but management is adding 2 additional assistant chief pilots. Anyone want to guess why management needs more assistant disciplinarians for fewer pilots? Looks to us like they plan on continuing the beatings.





As we close this week, please remember our 147 hostages and their families.





Captain Jayson Baron, EWR Council 170 Chairman

[email protected]

610 442-3817



First Officer Tara Cook, EWR Council 170 Vice Chairman

[email protected]

610 220-8904



Captain Kaye Riggs, EWR Council 170 Secretary-Treasurer

[email protected]

830 431-0450
Thank you for the great post. While hard to read, it is the truth of the industry. It is sad however that our fellow pilots will use such a well thought out and informative post as an invitation to berate other pilot groups, completely missing the point. While this post seems to indicate, as we all believe, that management is the issue, the immature/inexperienced pilots use this to reaffirm their stance as the #2 problem in the industry. These pilots are probably the ones that spend a little to much time in my cockpit trying to strike up a false friendship, or worse not even show the respect by asking at all, knowing that they can come home and hide behind their well-thought-out screen names and feel powerful enough to talk down to the same pilot that just helped them out.

Having read these forums with regularity, but only posting when I feel it's needed, I expect the immature, uneducated, irrational rebuttles. With any hope at all, one should expect unity and unified goal of a higher standard, no matter the regional, or for that matter, the major you work for.
Reply
Old 09-07-2009 | 10:52 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Student Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by tr disagree
I did hear that Colgan failed their safety audit by the FAA which should say something.
Curious where you heard this. Can you provide a link?
Reply
Old 09-07-2009 | 11:40 AM
  #14  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by CAL EWR


The article in The Buffalo News reads like a recounting of third-world sweatshop working conditions:
We are not a "third-world" sweatshop.... we have running water.

Just not in our planes
Reply
Old 09-07-2009 | 12:11 PM
  #15  
Cruise's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
We are not a "third-world" sweatshop.... we have running water.

Just not in our planes
Haha....actually, the Q does have running water. Guess we're slowly eeking our way into the second-world. Albeit, at an alarmingly slow pace.
Reply
Old 09-07-2009 | 12:31 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by newarkblows
And the colgan pilots want our support in their "negotiations"

Their attempt at a real airline is laughable. If they can achieve half the work rules and even close to industry average pay then it will be a monumental step up for them but will still be a drop in the bucket for the massive decrease in pilot compensation they have imposed on the profession.

to the colgan lovers i am not defending xjt taking mainline flying or any jet regional operator but the constant farming out of flying to the lowest, crappiest bidder is like our profession swimming with a cinder block tied to its foot. We will never get anywhere without an end to this. Just wait for your next contract to be underbid by some shoddy operator with grandiose dreams.
Do you even have a vague idea of how hypothetical your statement is?

XJT is a lower, crappier bidder than mainline, and by your definition CJC is a lower, crappier bidder that XJT. The regionals have become a race to the bottom, but putting your company up on a pedestal still pales in comparison to your mainline counterpart.

Show some support and quit with the whining, at the end of the day NONE of the flying belongs to ANY regional airline.
Reply
Old 09-07-2009 | 12:42 PM
  #17  
HSLD's Avatar
APC co-founder
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,853
Likes: 0
From: B777
Default

Originally Posted by SpiraMirabilis
Sometimes its taken, like in bankruptcy.
I can't recall a recent airline bankruptcy where a judge imposed a contract - can you? In the last decade, concessionary contracts have been negotiated (DAL, UAL, NWA, etc...) in Chapter 11 by the MECs and in most cases affirmed by membership ratification.

The fear was that the judge might impose more harsh terms, but scope at the majors has been negotiated away - not imposed.
Reply
Old 09-07-2009 | 01:02 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD
I can't recall a recent airline bankruptcy where a judge imposed a contract - can you? In the last decade, concessionary contracts have been negotiated (DAL, UAL, NWA, etc...) in Chapter 11 by the MECs and in most cases affirmed by membership ratification.

The fear was that the judge might impose more harsh terms, but scope at the majors has been negotiated away - not imposed.
I think it comes down to the self-preservation of one's own interests. Once "some" pilots become senior enough, i.e. furlough begins to look unlikely to reach them, they decide to re-prioritize their concerns.

While scope may have seemed like a good way to kick in a quick pay raise in a new working agreement, that effectively gave away market share from mainline pilot jobs to regional companies. What good is the best contract in the world if only a few handful of pilots are able to reap its' benefits?

At the end of the day, it is mainline representation who gave away scope and it will be mainline representation who will have to fight to get it back.
Reply
Old 09-07-2009 | 01:18 PM
  #19  
Ottopilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Scope at CAL has not changed. The Q400 is allowed per scope, just like the ATR-72's I flew for Express back in the 90's. CAL has good scope compared to most, but I would have liked to see a number limit on planes. They got the seat limits pretty good. I guess back then no one expected the huge regional jet fleets of today.
Reply
Old 09-07-2009 | 01:57 PM
  #20  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

It is not hard to sit in IAH and count all of the rj's waiting to fly mainline routes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
mjarosz
Regional
128
08-26-2010 04:42 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
CAL EWR
Major
11
08-02-2009 03:03 PM
CAL EWR
Major
8
07-12-2009 04:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices