Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Wow - Good job Pinnacle Crew and ATC >

Wow - Good job Pinnacle Crew and ATC


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Wow - Good job Pinnacle Crew and ATC

Old 12-17-2009 | 09:05 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

Is it possible that something smoldering or arcing in the electrical system created the CO? I could imagine something smoldering at a fairly low temperature, possibly not even tripping the circuit breaker or smoking, but still causing enough of a chemical reaction to emit an appreciable amount of CO. Combine that with the human physiology at a cabin altitude of a couple thousand feet and I can see how its possible to end up with some fairly serious impairment.

Anyone know if the level of impairment decreased after donning the O2 masks or were they not on it long enough to have much of an effect?
Reply
Old 12-17-2009 | 09:09 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: CFI/CFII/MEI
Default

As someone else said - great job realizing that something wasn't right and getting the plane safely on the ground.
Reply
Old 12-17-2009 | 09:16 AM
  #13  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,858
Likes: 658
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
I have always wondered about CO2 in the cabin. Unless something is burning I'm not sure where it would come from in a jet aircraft. Bleed air from the engines is extracted from the compressor. Simple physics shows that a gas will go from a higher pressure to a low pressure so I'm not sure how the combustion could flow back into the compressor on a high bypass turbofan. In no way am I doubting this situation. Clearly they had some type of contamination. Does anyone have an idea as to where this sort of thing could come from if nothing was actually burning?
Yes, something would have had to burn to produce CO. I can think of a few remote possibilities...

Oil leak in a compressor bearing ahead of the 10th stage might get heated enough by compression to burn and create CO...but you'd think it would also make smoke and bad smells.

Another possibility would be an oil leak in the left pack at a point where it could come in contact with hot bleed air. Since it seemed to affect the cockpit only that would mean it would have to come from the left bleed or pack. But again, no smoke?

They were on climb out, so engine power (and bleed temps) would be high.

I would rule out something in the cargo compartment since it only seemed to affect the cockpit.

Actually this is really weird...I can't imagine how there would be any trace of CO left by the time they shut down th engines, opened the doors, unloaded, and got somebody out there with a gas analyzer. The cockpit fans should have flushed it all out. I almost suspect that the CO was from a nearby operating GPU?

Maybe they were poisoned by burning oil additives, not CO.
Reply
Old 12-17-2009 | 09:31 AM
  #14  
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 34
From: Middle Seat
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yes, something would have had to burn to produce CO. I can think of a few remote possibilities...

Oil leak in a compressor bearing ahead of the 10th stage might get heated enough by compression to burn and create CO...but you'd think it would also make smoke and bad smells.

Another possibility would be an oil leak in the left pack at a point where it could come in contact with hot bleed air. Since it seemed to affect the cockpit only that would mean it would have to come from the left bleed or pack. But again, no smoke?

They were on climb out, so engine power (and bleed temps) would be high.

I would rule out something in the cargo compartment since it only seemed to affect the cockpit.

Actually this is really weird...I can't imagine how there would be any trace of CO left by the time they shut down th engines, opened the doors, unloaded, and got somebody out there with a gas analyzer. The cockpit fans should have flushed it all out. I almost suspect that the CO was from a nearby operating GPU?

Maybe they were poisoned by burning oil additives, not CO.
I was wondering all of these above points.

The article did mention a small amount of CO, so maybe it was something from the ground after they opened the door. Maybe there was a pressure issue of sorts, but again it seems like the rest of the cabin was unaffected so it's tough to say. This is a really odd situation.

Maybe they have an aftermarket heater in the nose and that was leaking CO
Reply
Old 12-17-2009 | 09:58 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
Maybe they have an aftermarket heater in the nose and that was leaking CO
Now that you mention it, I believe the CRJ's have a galley heater (keeps the FA's somewhat warm during boarding with the door open) that is like a small electric heater and fan. (or it is, I don't know much about it, I just know it is there).

That could be a source of something burning. Either dust or something gets in there or it overheats and the breaker doesn't trip. I remember being told that they used to have an issue with the intake of the heater getting blocked by the galley restocking form in between turns because fa's would use a clip on an adjacent cabinet and the paper would get flipped up by a breeze and block the heater intake causing it to overheat.

Either way I would guess you would have some kind of burning smell in this instance.
Reply
Old 12-17-2009 | 11:00 AM
  #16  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,858
Likes: 658
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon
Now that you mention it, I believe the CRJ's have a galley heater (keeps the FA's somewhat warm during boarding with the door open) that is like a small electric heater and fan. (or it is, I don't know much about it, I just know it is there).

That could be a source of something burning. Either dust or something gets in there or it overheats and the breaker doesn't trip. I remember being told that they used to have an issue with the intake of the heater getting blocked by the galley restocking form in between turns because fa's would use a clip on an adjacent cabinet and the paper would get flipped up by a breeze and block the heater intake causing it to overheat.

Either way I would guess you would have some kind of burning smell in this instance.
The electric burner wouldn't produce any CO, it would have to ignite something else in large quantities...dust bunnys wouldn't be enough. Also any accidental combustion would produce a lot of smoke. Only finely tuned devices like engines burning specific fuels can avoid generating smoke.
Reply
Old 12-17-2009 | 11:15 AM
  #17  
CRJ1000's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: B-747-400/8
Cool

Good job crew!
I cannot wait the see what the FAA decides to do about this...probably a new AD that will require the crew to have one pilot on O2 for all flights (in addition to speed limitations for the flaps below 200 kts, flaps 45 diversion fuel, setting 10 degrees of pitch on T/O, etc.)
Reply
Old 12-17-2009 | 11:51 AM
  #18  
mooney's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 captain
Default

would excessive use of Ipods produce CO?
Reply
Old 12-17-2009 | 12:01 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by andy171773
They should've turned off the cabin heat! Their muffler shroud must be damaged and leaking!
and pop open a window
Reply
Old 12-17-2009 | 05:48 PM
  #20  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy

Anyone know if the level of impairment decreased after donning the O2 masks or were they not on it long enough to have much of an effect?
CO binds to hemoglobin better than O2. Straight O2 would reduce hypoxia, but eliminating CO takes a while.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
atpcliff
Major
18
06-03-2009 10:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices