![]() |
Colgan..........really?
place seems worse off than when I left it
This PBS special is EYE OPENING.............. very sad, Colgan Pilots deserve better |
ahhh don't worry. There will be 15 guys in the next 24 hours posting on the Colgan hiring thread about the fax number to send their resume's.
|
Originally Posted by mooney
(Post 761138)
ahhh don't worry. There will be 15 guys in the next 24 hours posting on the Colgan hiring thread about the fax number to send their resume's.
|
DAMN!!! not on here in the west for another hour!!!!
|
Quality presentation by PBS...did a solid job reporting facts
|
Yeah, the Colgan name ain't the best in the navy.
|
Colgan management is scum. By accepting employment at this company you are accepting and promoting abysmal work rules and pay. They made somewhere around 30 million in one of the last quarters off of the backs of these hard working employees... This is not OK!!! If you work for colgan you need to get upset and you need to educate yourself on how far Colgan is lagging behind its competitors in work rules, corporate culture, and pay.
It was a good special. |
Originally Posted by topprospect16
(Post 761146)
Quality presentation by PBS...did a solid job reporting facts
The Colgan pilots on the show were very well spoken, and did a very good job of representing day to day life. I highly suggest to anyone who has not watched, to make sure to do so I also think the FAA should be ashamed of themselves, they know exactly what goes on and turn their heads........ |
Originally Posted by newarkblows
(Post 761155)
Colgan management is scum. By accepting employment at this company you are accepting and promoting abysmal work rules and pay. They made somewhere around 30 million in one of the last quarters off of the backs of these hard working employees... This is not OK!!! If you work for colgan you need to get upset and you need to educate yourself on how far Colgan is lagging behind its competitors in work rules, corporate culture, and pay.
It was a good special. |
Great show. Hopefully a lot of people got educated tonight about our industry.
My only comment would be to highlight the fact that there are a lot of great highly capable regional pilots out there flying the line every day. |
"I just wish they would have given regional pilots more credit"
When reporters come on here looking for opinions, the vast majority of users blast the media and call them all kinds of nasty names. It's not pretty. I would suggest that, in the future, folks consider what they say at APC could end up in the news. The site has been quoted before several times in the media. Perhaps reporters should be judged on past history and not all painted with the same brush. I can't think of a better way to get the word out about the state of the regional industry airline pilot than a PBS show like this, unless it was a show like this on prime time.... |
^ I agree, too bad this wasnt on NBC or something..........
|
It's been a long time since I thought a news story was actually ACCURATE, I was hugely impressed by the quality of journalism presented here. While I have in many instances doubted the quality of reporting based on misreporting of aviation stories, the accuracy of this report makes me want to believe frontline on other issues.
|
Trying to get into this industry or not... I just cant believe that anyone would want to work at Colgan...
Colgan is the example of what not to do... in every respect. |
Originally Posted by Blueskies21
(Post 761179)
It's been a long time since I thought a news story was actually ACCURATE, I was hugely impressed by the quality of journalism presented here. While I have in many instances doubted the quality of reporting based on misreporting of aviation stories, the accuracy of this report makes me want to believe frontline on other issues.
|
^ Pretty tough to get the other side of this deal. I doubt anyone at Colgan wanted to get in front of a camera. Just have Cohen point the finger at everyone else (FAA, Pilots, Passengers) and call it good.
|
Originally Posted by IC ALL
(Post 761167)
"I just wish they would have given regional pilots more credit"
When reporters come on here looking for opinions, the vast majority of users blast the media and call them all kinds of nasty names. It's not pretty. I would suggest that, in the future, folks consider what they say at APC could end up in the news. http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/re...frontline.html I did think this show was very well done. Hope it opens some eyes. |
There may be some regionals better than others but ALL are subpar. Claiming "pride" (as it appears) that your airline doesn't pay pilots less than $35k/yr? Thats still disgustingly low.
As long as there is fee-for-departure and flying is being outsourced to the lowest bidder, there will be immense safety issues. We need a new system, an FAA that actually cares about safety, and actual real stiff penalties for those who do not. Colgan shouldn't still have an operating certificate. Pinnacle shouldn't still be in business. Every other regional should be scared that if they slip up even once, they're next. |
Originally Posted by topprospect16
(Post 761146)
Quality presentation by PBS...did a solid job reporting facts
NO mention of regional safety over the years. (i.e. how man crashes per carrier) (not 1 single mention of safety over the years, except for the mention of the last 6 crashes were regionals over the past 8 years.)(slight bias for their argument) NO mention of training practices for any regional (only a small bit on the Cpt. Renslow) NO mention about other regionals practices (besides Colgan) NO current pilot interviews (even if identity was hidden) NO mention of how a lot of pilots that aren't at regionals anymore got their start there and are on mainline now or something differen't It proves that Cohen and Continental's CEO is an idiot and at least made me think they aren't pilots (not sure if they are or not). ULTIMATELY it didn't tell me anything that I didn't know before, There were good things though: IT did bring to light how the relationship between mainline and the regionals. IT did bring to light duty/rest days as pilots and how much they actually work in a given day. IT did bring to light the low pay. IT did bring to light that its ultimately the FAA that is big brother but does a crappy job at it (at times) P.S. where are the former colgan pilots now, anyone know? out of the three that interviewed, mainly the 2 they talked to the most. This has changed my view of the regionals (very little) but I thought it was a sub-par report |
Originally Posted by Jamers
(Post 761147)
Yeah, the Colgan name ain't the best in the navy.
|
Originally Posted by IlliniPilot99
(Post 761235)
I disagree...it was a solid reporting for an attack but MOST definitely wasn't objective.
NO mention of regional safety over the years. (i.e. how man crashes per carrier) (not 1 single mention of safety over the years, except for the mention of the last 6 crashes were regionals over the past 8 years.)(slight bias for their argument) NO mention of training practices for any regional (only a small bit on the Cpt. Renslow) NO mention about other regionals practices (besides Colgan) NO current pilot interviews (even if identity was hidden) NO mention of how a lot of pilots that aren't at regionals anymore got their start there and are on mainline now or something differen't It proves that Cohen and Continental's CEO is an idiot and at least made me think they aren't pilots (not sure if they are or not). ULTIMATELY it didn't tell me anything that I didn't know before, There were good things though: IT did bring to light how the relationship between mainline and the regionals. IT did bring to light duty/rest days as pilots and how much they actually work in a given day. IT did bring to light the low pay. IT did bring to light that its ultimately the FAA that is big brother but does a crappy job at it (at times) P.S. where are the former colgan pilots now, anyone know? out of the three that interviewed, mainly the 2 they talked to the most. This has changed my view of the regionals (very little) but I thought it was a sub-par report |
Originally Posted by IC ALL
(Post 761167)
"I just wish they would have given regional pilots more credit"
When reporters come on here looking for opinions, the vast majority of users blast the media and call them all kinds of nasty names. It's not pretty. I would suggest that, in the future, folks consider what they say at APC could end up in the news. The site has been quoted before several times in the media. Perhaps reporters should be judged on past history and not all painted with the same brush. I can't think of a better way to get the word out about the state of the regional industry airline pilot than a PBS show like this, unless it was a show like this on prime time.... You and I have had our difference of opinion a majority of the time, but you are a 100% right about this one. People on this forum tend to blast, misjudge, and react by typing without thinking. Maybe it’s a personal issue, maybe it’s an attempt to boost there self confidence, maybe it’s the fact that they don’t get the attention they want or need elsewhere; whatever it is, they seem to find pleasure in picking on the easiest target. If only people thought about the positive outcome about speaking to a reporter on this particular issue, I’m sure we would get our point across quite well. Things don’t get done when you keep quiet: if you haven’t figured that out yet you should stay away from a safety related career. And for those who say ‘we haven’t seen you contact the press..’ believe me, I have. Here are a few recent examples: -Colgan crew memo regarding calling in fatigue. -A good portion of TSA’s fleet pulled out of service due to a lack of maintenance. Look at my previous recent posts, trying to educate a misinformed APC poster on what a reporter was trying to do. I am not sure if his rebuttal and reasoning was serious or sarcastic. I am glad you brought this up IC_ALL. Maybe some people will begin to use there heads now. |
Originally Posted by Blueskies21
(Post 761262)
Was it all encompassing? No, most definately not but within the scope of items covered I thought it was very accurate.
ill agree with that statement...frontLine is usually pretty good about their investigative reporting...it seemed they already had an answer to a question they intended to ask by investigation |
People need to realize its not just Colgan, its the whole industry. It all sucks. I sure hope the feds do something, because the industry as a whole doesn't need anymore negative light.
|
Their belongs to them, There is a place not here and They're is they are.... I had to, I really am that OCD.
|
Originally Posted by Flyboyrw
(Post 761275)
People need to realize its not just Colgan, its the whole industry. It all sucks. I sure hope the feds do something, because the industry as a whole doesn't need anymore negative light.
|
If I worked for colgan, I wouldn't be getting furloughed. People have said go work for Colgan now you don't have a job, and I am not going to do that.
|
I remember watching that hearing live online when the senators talked to the different airline managements. I was disgusted then and I am even more disgusted now knowing that they still haven't returned any info to the senators about accepting liability in the form of becoming active participants in the regional subsidiaries and contract partners.
During that hearing these CEOs and Chief Pilots were lying right to the senators faces. One senator in particular said that usually these hearings should not be on a personal level. However, his brother was lost in a not so distant aircraft accident and to him it was personal. He had a ton of knowledge of our industry and when he would back the management of the airlines into a corner, they would lie to him. Why don't the actual line pilots get invited into these hearings. Just like they did in this video tonight, we should be able to come forward and state the facts (Not Roger Cohen's facts of AVERAGE pay for regional CAs and FOs. Props for cutting him off there and telling him that we weren't talking about the average, but the ever so real junior guys at the bottom. I've had friends calling me all night after watching this video. While I have been telling them for years that this stuff exists, they now realize there is a huge problem. Hopefully they pass that video on to everyone they know. |
Incase anyone missed it..
FRONTLINE: flying cheap: watch the full program | PBS get this to everyone you know... this needs to be forwarded to every one in America. |
Originally Posted by Flyboyrw
(Post 761283)
If I worked for colgan, I wouldn't be getting furloughed. People have said go work for Colgan now you don't have a job, and I am not going to do that.
|
Originally Posted by IlliniPilot99
(Post 761235)
I disagree...it was a solid reporting for an attack but MOST definitely wasn't objective.
ULTIMATELY it didn't tell me anything that I didn't know before, This has changed my view of the regionals (very little) but I thought it was a sub-par report What we all need to keep in mind is that this report wasn't meant for just pilots to watch. It's meant for the general American public to watch and learn from. So it's not as in depth as I'm sure many of us would like. It's nice to finally see an accurate piece of journalism that addressed many of the major concerns that pilots have about the direction the industry has been going. I think if Mr. O'Brien had more time, more of these issues would have been addressed. |
I wish they would have gone deeper into fatigue. But over all decent story. Its nice to see a report on aviation that is factual and not completely company bias.
|
Dumb question... I am not a pilot but i noticed watching this show last night they said the FO on the Buffalo flight raised the flaps when the plane started to stall which they mentioned was a huge mistake... I was just wondering what a effect would raising the flaps have to an aircraft that was on approach to land?
|
Simply put, raising the flaps would change the shape of the wing making it produce less lift at low speeds and in this situation resulting in a stall. Flaps allow the wing to produce more lift at slower speeds such as on an approach.
Not a dumb question at all. |
I was impressed with Miles Obrien, I used to think he was just a CNN reporter with a private pilots rating, but he really dug deep, and he didnt let That Satanic Roger Cohen get around the questions..
Good Job Miles! |
Correct me if I am wrong but frontline didn't do a story about Comair in Lexington.
|
For those who watched the video, please read the article below and then watch the parts where Roger Cohen was interviewed... pay special attention to his body language. You'll find an interesting correlation between his interview and the article below:
"Psychological research suggests that liars no matter how good they are always give off subtle clues that they are not being truthful if you know what to look for. The list below will help you go some way to 'spotting a liar'. 1. EYE CONTACT. A common misconception is that a person who is lying is unable to maintain eye contact. Nonsense: people break eye contact all the time - our eyes are moving constantly. In fact a person who is lying is more likely to unnaturally hold eye contact with you for this very reason as he thinks if he breaks it you will know he is lying. 2. BLINKING. A person who is lying will blink a lot,as blinking seems to correlate to the amount of mental stress we are under. In a normal conversation where a person is attuned to you, he will blink at roughly the same rate as you, often at moments when you pause in your speech. Be wary of someone who is blinking frantically as they speak with you. 3. SHOULDER MOVEMENTS. A person who is in easy rapport with you will often mirror your body position, which means if he was stood in front of you his shoulders would be parallel to your own. If he is uncomfortable with his own statements and is lying - he is may express this by turning his shoulders away a little. A shoulder shrug at the same time may again signify a lack of conviction in his own statements. 4. NOT USING I. A liar likes to distance himself from the lie and will normally be reluctant to refer to himself, whereas in normal conversation we usually refer to ourselves a lot. Watch out for less use of 'I', 'my', 'me' and so on. 5. BRIEF EXPLANATIONS. Although a person will probably become a little long winded when lying, he will conversely tend to be rather superficial in his descriptions of significant events. Embellishments are suddenly skipped over, and details ignored. If you ask a liar to expand upon his story, the chances are you will just get a repeat of what you've just heard, rather than filling in with more details. 6. SLOWING DOWN. Because a liar has to juggle different thoughts with one another and be careful of tripping himself up - his speech will slow accordingly. His language may become stiffer and more formal and there will more slips of the tongue and pauses in his speech that may be filled with 'er' and 'um' to give himself more time to think” Reference: LINDA PRESTON WORKS AS A PROFESSIONAL PSYCHIC & WRITER.HER WORK HAS BEEN FEATURED POSITIVELY IN NATIONAL MAGAZINES AND SHE IS A FREQUENT EXPERT GUEST ON VARIOUS RADIO SHOWS. SHE IS ALWAYS INTERESTED IN WHAT MAKES PEOPLE TICK . SHE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA HER WEBSITE. |
Originally Posted by carlomonte
(Post 761248)
dont worry name change and its past! valujet=airtran
|
Originally Posted by skidmark
(Post 761438)
Correct me if I am wrong but frontline didn't do a story about Comair in Lexington.
|
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 761455)
Yeah, I'm surprised they havent just merged the two companies and get rid of the Colgan name.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands