Eagle MEC elects to force pilots out of union
#141
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Of ALL the arguements, that one is the weakest, the most incorrect, and constantly repeating it just places doubt on everything else you guys say.
The contract, typically called a CBA, is something you accepted. It will have multiple little sections, and supplements (LOA's), none of which YOU will sign for; yet you will get the benefit of each section... so, claiming "I didnt' sign anything" is irrelevant to the issue; since the supplement (LOA) was negotiated as part of your contract.
There is probably nothing in your contract saying how you get reimbursed for parking either... only that you do. It is up to the company to decide the process, and at most airlines they provide a form for you to submit for that... the point being that just because every little minutia isn't spelled out in a contract doesn't mean it isn't valid.
again, this arguement doesn't help your case either.
Didn't I hear that the arbitrator already said he isn't going to force anybody to flow, isn't going to push anybody into a furlough, and that if you chose not to go your slot does pass to the next guy in line?
So, what's the problem then ?
The contract, typically called a CBA, is something you accepted. It will have multiple little sections, and supplements (LOA's), none of which YOU will sign for; yet you will get the benefit of each section... so, claiming "I didnt' sign anything" is irrelevant to the issue; since the supplement (LOA) was negotiated as part of your contract.
again, this arguement doesn't help your case either.
granted these may seem small to you, but since you want to mention contract then we mention legalities and requirements.
I would not listen to the shiny jet syndrome guys or the ones drooling and tripping over there feet to get a quick upgrade. they are the same ones that have been wrong for years, and nothing is going to change.
I would not listen to the shiny jet syndrome guys or the ones drooling and tripping over there feet to get a quick upgrade. they are the same ones that have been wrong for years, and nothing is going to change.
So, what's the problem then ?
#142
let me summarize PARA F of Letter 3, this paragraph only requires you to elect Eagle Rights.
You dont elect Flow through, you know why, because you are automatically at the completion of IOE a Flow through. There is no election of Flow through required just eagle rights.
Secondly, no one signed anything that was legal.
The letter you may be referring to was illegal, nothing in Letter 3 requires you to elect Flowthrough and sign any paper work to that effect., so the letter was an AE thing and does not have any bearing on the issue, because it was not required by Letter 3.
You dont elect Flow through, you know why, because you are automatically at the completion of IOE a Flow through. There is no election of Flow through required just eagle rights.
Secondly, no one signed anything that was legal.
The letter you may be referring to was illegal, nothing in Letter 3 requires you to elect Flowthrough and sign any paper work to that effect., so the letter was an AE thing and does not have any bearing on the issue, because it was not required by Letter 3.
The treatment of both DAL and UAL regarding their acquisition of Pan Am, the AA acquisition of TWA and the AAA pilot hissy fit in the merger with AWA are all examples of union pilots greedily stabbing each other in the back to line their own pockets. While I still believe a union is in our best interests, it is important that we hold our leadership and membership to the Code of Ethics.
#143
On the side; How's that ground job working out since you left Eagle? You've obviously miss it since you've kept in touch and love talking about it. Any regrets about leaving?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post