Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Eagle MEC elects to force pilots out of union >

Eagle MEC elects to force pilots out of union

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Eagle MEC elects to force pilots out of union

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2010, 04:51 AM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8 View Post
Secondly, no one signed anything that was legal.
Of ALL the arguements, that one is the weakest, the most incorrect, and constantly repeating it just places doubt on everything else you guys say.

The contract, typically called a CBA, is something you accepted. It will have multiple little sections, and supplements (LOA's), none of which YOU will sign for; yet you will get the benefit of each section... so, claiming "I didnt' sign anything" is irrelevant to the issue; since the supplement (LOA) was negotiated as part of your contract.

Originally Posted by buddies8 View Post
The letter you may be referring to was illegal, nothing in Letter 3 requires you to elect Flowthrough and sign any paper work to that effect., so the letter was an AE thing and does not have any bearing on the issue, because it was not required by Letter 3.
There is probably nothing in your contract saying how you get reimbursed for parking either... only that you do. It is up to the company to decide the process, and at most airlines they provide a form for you to submit for that... the point being that just because every little minutia isn't spelled out in a contract doesn't mean it isn't valid.

again, this arguement doesn't help your case either.

Originally Posted by buddies8 View Post
granted these may seem small to you, but since you want to mention contract then we mention legalities and requirements.
I would not listen to the shiny jet syndrome guys or the ones drooling and tripping over there feet to get a quick upgrade. they are the same ones that have been wrong for years, and nothing is going to change.
Didn't I hear that the arbitrator already said he isn't going to force anybody to flow, isn't going to push anybody into a furlough, and that if you chose not to go your slot does pass to the next guy in line?

So, what's the problem then ?
Mason32 is offline  
Old 03-12-2010, 12:30 PM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8 View Post
let me summarize PARA F of Letter 3, this paragraph only requires you to elect Eagle Rights.
You dont elect Flow through, you know why, because you are automatically at the completion of IOE a Flow through. There is no election of Flow through required just eagle rights.
Secondly, no one signed anything that was legal.
The letter you may be referring to was illegal, nothing in Letter 3 requires you to elect Flowthrough and sign any paper work to that effect., so the letter was an AE thing and does not have any bearing on the issue, because it was not required by Letter 3.
All excellent points, buddies8. Although I wouldn't characterize the fact some (not all) pilots made their mark on a piece of paper as illegal, it certainly is not a contract nor a legal document.

Originally Posted by buddies8 View Post
I would not listen to the shiny jet syndrome guys or the ones drooling and tripping over there feet to get a quick upgrade. they are the same ones that have been wrong for years, and nothing is going to change.
It won't be the first time a group of unionized pilots have sacrificed a portion of their own membership for the personal gain of the others and it won't be the last. It happened with Metro Eagle when EAL collapsed and AMR only wanted the DFW operation, not the ATL hub so the MEC Chairman and his henchmen cut all the ATL pilots loose regardless of seniority.

The treatment of both DAL and UAL regarding their acquisition of Pan Am, the AA acquisition of TWA and the AAA pilot hissy fit in the merger with AWA are all examples of union pilots greedily stabbing each other in the back to line their own pockets. While I still believe a union is in our best interests, it is important that we hold our leadership and membership to the Code of Ethics.
Beagle Pilot is offline  
Old 03-12-2010, 12:44 PM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32 View Post
Of ALL the arguements, that one is the weakest, the most incorrect, and constantly repeating it just places doubt on everything else you guys say.
Saying it's weak doesn't make it so. The fact remains it is true. Saying that marking an option entails a legal obligation to stick with that choice forever and that one must go through with it regardless of when or where doesn't make it true either no matter how often it is said.
Originally Posted by Mason32 View Post
Didn't I hear that the arbitrator already said he isn't going to force anybody to flow, isn't going to push anybody into a furlough, and that if you chose not to go your slot does pass to the next guy in line?

So, what's the problem then ?
The problem is similar to that of a person who finds out a coworker attempted to steal their identity and raid their bank account. Just because it failed doesn't mean it should be forgiven or forgotten.

On the side; How's that ground job working out since you left Eagle? You've obviously miss it since you've kept in touch and love talking about it. Any regrets about leaving?
Beagle Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rocket Man
Major
57
11-06-2009 09:12 PM
CAL EWR
Major
6
09-02-2009 07:00 AM
CAL EWR
Major
16
08-23-2009 06:26 AM
Maxclimb12
Major
1
03-18-2009 03:52 PM
GW258
Union Talk
0
01-19-2009 07:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices