![]() |
Originally Posted by xjsaab
(Post 787616)
There's nothing in my FOM that states that I can't say Delta Connection operated by Mesaba Airlines or just Mesaba Airlines. You have made too many assumptions tonight.
Never said pay me better and I will comply. Another assumption on your part. Our pilot group, though it has had it's share of growing/shrinking pains, puts out a very good product. We want to be paid better because of our professional standards. When our company slammed us during negotiations and later a sham bankruptcy we held our ground and did our job to the highest standard. I'm proud to say I work for Mesaba because of my fellow co-workers. |
God forbid there is a crash... But we all know the PR people for Delta will be the first to say that was a Delta-Connection flight and not an actual Delta flight. Kinda like how the whole Colgan thing played out in the press. At first everything was "Continental 3407", then as the days go by you finally saw that Contiental was actually trying to seperate themselves from this crash. It was now "Colgan 3407"
|
Really...who cares... make the stupid PA saying Delta..finish the trip.. go home and forget about it. Saying Delta or Delta Connection isnt gonna change the fact that we are paid and treated like crap.
|
Originally Posted by PCLCREW
(Post 788258)
Really...who cares... make the stupid PA saying Delta..finish the trip.. go home and forget about it. Saying Delta or Delta Connection isnt gonna change the fact that we are paid and treated like crap.
ding ding ding...we have a winner. |
Originally Posted by HercDriver130
(Post 788372)
ding ding ding...we have a winner.
FWIW, new FIF stating that we should resume "Delta Connection Flight XXXX" immediately. |
Originally Posted by PCLCREW
(Post 788258)
Really...who cares... make the stupid PA saying Delta..finish the trip.. go home and forget about it. Saying Delta or Delta Connection isnt gonna change the fact that we are paid and treated like crap.
I'm not sure you get the whole point of these message boards. Important/interesting to you or not, it's simply dissemination of information to fellow aviators. If you find a particular subject uninteresting/irrelevant, then just click the 'back' button. |
Originally Posted by Poprocket
(Post 788774)
FWIW, new FIF stating that we should resume "Delta Connection Flight XXXX" immediately.
|
Originally Posted by Poprocket
(Post 788774)
FWIW, new FIF stating that we should resume "Delta Connection Flight XXXX" immediately.
|
New memo came out today at Comair - Pilots are now "FORBIDDEN" from using the name Comair in ANY PA announcements. Effective immediately, the only approved name is "Delta Connection".
That's right, the word "Forbidden" was actually used. In a memo. About speech. To professionals. I guess "prohibited" was too soft, S.TF.U was too blue collar, and "outlawed" was too harsh? |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 787889)
Yep, and PWA 1D-7 might have a little leverage too!
1. D. 7. - Delta Connection flying aircraft will only bear the name “Delta” as part of a phrase referencing a Connection-type operation. |
Originally Posted by Truman_Sparks
(Post 787501)
I'll never understand this line of logic! You claim you'll say Mesaba because that is what your paycheck says. Well, the company that pays your check (Mesaba) instructs you to follow their rules, one of which is what to say over their PA system to the passengers. So, by your logic, you would say whatever they want you to say, since they pay your paycheck. In addition to that, the money they get to pay you comes directly from Delta Airlines - who is the one instructing Mesaba (possibly if it is to follow like the rest) on what they want said to their passengers! So tell me again, why do you get to decide what you will say?
|
Originally Posted by PCLCREW
(Post 788258)
Really...who cares... make the stupid PA saying Delta..finish the trip.. go home and forget about it. Saying Delta or Delta Connection isnt gonna change the fact that we are paid and treated like crap.
|
Originally Posted by NismoRacer
(Post 788900)
Thats what I'm talkin about. Just do what I do, dont make boarding announcements. :) If you do HAVE to make a PA, just dont say the name.
|
Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot
(Post 788923)
Were you the Captain on the DCI flight I rode on last week? We were delayed two hours for a mechanical problem. When we finally did board, the pilots didn't make a single PA to the passengers during the entire flight about the problem or even apologizing for running late. Looked pretty bad. Who cares, though... you don't work for Delta, right? You may have been joking about the above statement... hence the smiley. It's just annoying when a DCI carrier doesn't give a crap about Delta passengers. If the passengers have a bad experience on a DCI carrier, they don't get ****ed at Comair, Skywest, ASA, etc... they get ****ed at Delta. This is one of many reasons why we need to take some of our flying back and/or not give away anymore scope. We need to be able to control the quality of our product.
|
Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot
(Post 788923)
Were you the Captain on the DCI flight I rode on last week? We were delayed two hours for a mechanical problem. When we finally did board, the pilots didn't make a single PA to the passengers during the entire flight about the problem or even apologizing for running late. Looked pretty bad. Who cares, though... you don't work for Delta, right? You may have been joking about the above statement... hence the smiley. It's just annoying when a DCI carrier doesn't give a crap about Delta passengers. If the passengers have a bad experience on a DCI carrier, they don't get ****ed at Comair, Skywest, ASA, etc... they get ****ed at Delta. This is one of many reasons why we need to take some of our flying back and/or not give away anymore scope. We need to be able to control the quality of our product.
|
Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot
(Post 788923)
Were you the Captain on the DCI flight I rode on last week? We were delayed two hours for a mechanical problem. When we finally did board, the pilots didn't make a single PA to the passengers during the entire flight about the problem or even apologizing for running late. Looked pretty bad. Who cares, though... you don't work for Delta, right? You may have been joking about the above statement... hence the smiley. It's just annoying when a DCI carrier doesn't give a crap about Delta passengers. If the passengers have a bad experience on a DCI carrier, they don't get ****ed at Comair, Skywest, ASA, etc... they get ****ed at Delta. This is one of many reasons why we need to take some of our flying back and/or not give away anymore scope. We need to be able to control the quality of our product.
|
Originally Posted by jayray2
(Post 789034)
According to the numbers our management publishes ASA and Skywest actually get higher marks than mainline when it comes to providing the passengers with "timely and accurate" information. I believe the forms and questionnaires that customers complete do not allow the customer to fill in the carrier, the company that compiles that information determines what carrier the customer was flying based on flight number and date.
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 789010)
So what are you waiting for?
Originally Posted by NismoRacer
(Post 789025)
Nope that wasn't me. I was not joking though. When we are delayed I make plenty of announcements. I was just talking about normal boarding announcements. If there is something wrong I will let people know. It just suck to always have to appologize for the company I work for, ie waiting for 30 to 45 minutes for numbers. I care greatly for my pax. I could care less if they are "Delta" pax, when they are on my airplane they are MY pax, and I will treat them like I would my family.
|
Originally Posted by NismoRacer
(Post 788900)
Thats what I'm talkin about. Just do what I do, dont make boarding announcements. :) If you do HAVE to make a PA, just dont say the name.
I kind of agree with you. I get so sick of the standard PA "welcome aboard flight #### service to ###, operated by ####." People know where they are going and they can care less about what flight it is. Cockpit PA's should be short and concise and not drag on and on. |
Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot
(Post 788923)
This is one of many reasons why we need to take some of our flying back and/or not give away anymore scope. We need to be able to control the quality of our product.
|
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 789152)
Too bad you and your brethren did not have that great idea 10 years ago.
|
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 788885)
New memo came out today at Comair - Pilots are now "FORBIDDEN" from using the name Comair in ANY PA announcements. Effective immediately, the only approved name is "Delta Connection".
That's right, the word "Forbidden" was actually used. In a memo. About speech. To professionals. I guess "prohibited" was too soft, S.TF.U was too blue collar, and "outlawed" was too harsh? On a side note: Browsing through the Sky mag, looking at the cool shiny jet pictures of the mighty Delta fleet, it shows everything from the 747-400 down to the mighty SF340 as aircraft in the "Delta Fleet" No mention of any of the current connection carriers. For the customer, the boundry line between the connection carrier and Mother Del-dah is all but gone. I wonder what the mainline DAL folks think about that :rolleyes:... Looks like those are Delta aircraft, shouldn't they be flown by Delta pilots and cabin crew? Sadly, the venerable DC-9 was suspicously absent :( So the Saab, the EMB 170, and 145 make the list, but the -9 is out. :eek: |
Originally Posted by SabreDriver
(Post 789712)
Must be working, crews are in compliance. Rode a Comair flight today, oops, Delta Connection flight.... Announced as "this is Delta Connection flight xxxx to JFK" No mention of Comair.... whatsoever.
On a side note: Browsing through the Sky mag, looking at the cool shiny jet pictures of the mighty Delta fleet, it shows everything from the 747-400 down to the mighty SF340 as aircraft in the "Delta Fleet" No mention of any of the current connection carriers. For the customer, the boundry line between the connection carrier and Mother Del-dah is all but gone. I wonder what the mainline DAL folks think about that :rolleyes:... Looks like those are Delta aircraft, shouldn't they be flown by Delta pilots and cabin crew? Sadly, the venerable DC-9 was suspicously absent :( So the Saab, the EMB 170, and 145 make the list, but the -9 is out. :eek: |
yep they show the md 90 and list the similar aircraft
|
I stand corrected.... I guess the -9 folks are still in the family
|
How long until the "operated by xxxxx airlines" decals by the cabin door come off, I wonder?
|
Originally Posted by Yzerman
(Post 789842)
How long until the "operated by xxxxx airlines" decals by the cabin door come off, I wonder?
|
Just hope I don't have to start wearing the hat and a double-breasted jacket. At least the jacket is optional now, as opposed to May 1.
|
Doesn't have to get any smaller cause you can't see it unless your doing the walkaround thanks to the jet bridge :rolleyes:
Well I guess if your boarding from the tarmac maybe. |
Originally Posted by Yzerman
(Post 789842)
How long until the "operated by xxxxx airlines" decals by the cabin door come off, I wonder?
|
Actually, those names are here and at a certain size because of requirements in the DAL PWA. Unless we delete that section, they are going no where.
Also, this little PA game is a very sticky issue here. I would be willing to be that it will get reversed and rather quickly. If not there will be some action on it. |
Its been reversed in the latest FIF; we(9E) are back to saying Delta Connection.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands