Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Plan for higher pay scales? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/49802-plan-higher-pay-scales.html)

TwinTurboPilot 04-13-2010 07:54 AM

raising the minimum requirements wont change the pay. 10-15 years ago you needed 2500TT to even get looked to fly right seat in a Beech 1900. Guess what there was no shortage of applicants and the pay still sucked.

asims33 04-13-2010 07:59 AM


Originally Posted by TwinTurboPilot (Post 795044)
raising the minimum requirements wont change the pay. 10-15 years ago you needed 2500TT to even get looked to fly right seat in a Beech 1900. Guess what there was no shortage of applicants and the pay still sucked.



Maybe im being silly but what is stopping most pilots in ALPA from starting an industry wide strike to increase pay? Im not 121 yet so i dont know all the reasoning forgive my ignorance.

flynwmn 04-13-2010 08:01 AM


Originally Posted by asims33 (Post 795050)
Maybe im being silly but what is stopping most pilots in ALPA from starting an industry wide strike to increase pay? Im not 121 yet so i dont know all the reasoning forgive my ignorance.

Railway Labor Act

Diver Driver 04-13-2010 08:03 AM


Originally Posted by asims33 (Post 795041)
How do you attract people to this industry when you tell them..

Set out to be a pilot spend 100k 2 years training 3 years working your butt off in little planes teaching others then get hired (if your lucky) and work for little to no money the first few years as an FO...OR go to college get a degree in architecture with your 5 years and make 200k a year out of the gate...

That's exactly the point. If the airlines cannot find enough qualified applicants that meet the 1,500 hour law, they will have to make changes in order to attract qualified applicants. Pay would be one of those changes. Pay goes up, more students may be willing to walk the path. The happy little cycle continues.

I really don't see any downside to this law passing, other than a bunch of flight school kids getting whiny about 'how hard it will be' and how they 'deserve a job right out of school'... but talking about the 'generation of entitlement' is for another discussion.

Diver Driver 04-13-2010 08:05 AM


Originally Posted by asims33 (Post 795050)
Maybe im being silly but what is stopping most pilots in ALPA from starting an industry wide strike to increase pay? Im not 121 yet so i dont know all the reasoning forgive my ignorance.

The RLA... if we could get out of that, pilots would probably have more leverage.

EDIT: Sorry flynwmn, you beat me to it!

asims33 04-13-2010 08:14 AM

Hmm i just read about the RLA

It says major strikes are only allowed when all other methods of dispute have been exhausted. And you may only strike on a large scale when you are striking to resolve a major issue.

The RLA seems to have a lot of loose ends :p

snippercr 04-13-2010 08:15 AM


Originally Posted by asims33 (Post 795032)
Well like so many others my concern is that what incentive to people have to put 100k into training or close to it and spend 2-5 years doing it then another 2-3 years instructing living off scraps to get to a regional that is gonna pay 19-25k for the first 2-3 years.... Its not worth it. The first thing that needs to change is the pay scale...THEN the requirements. just my opinion.

My understanding was the whole thing about the bill was to increase the SAFETY on air transport, not the pilot pay. The problem I have with the bill is look at the past major crashes by regionals... did any of them have pilots with less than 1500 hours when they crashed? Yes they got hired with less than that, but once they got 1500 hours, they could have been hired.

If we REALLY want to see pilot pay increase, I would love to see a 4 year degree in aviation, management, or aerospace e. Airlines should also look at activities outside of aviation, volunteer programs/community involvement, and college grades. These are the requirements for just about ANY PROFESSIONAL entry level job.

A garbage man or bus driver just is looked at to see if they can pass the training, then they get trained and payed 20-30k. That's all aviation is now. Can you pass the training? Good, pass it and collect your minimum wage.

However, why would any airline want to require a 4 year degree/1500 hours/volunteering? That means they WOULD have to pay more and why on gods green earth would they want THAT when they are happily paying pilot's nothing!

Disclaimer: I support the ATP rule even though I am a lowly CFI with only 500 hours. I humbly respect everyone who has gotten where they are regardless of their experience and just because our jobs may not be PERCEIVED as professional (argument above), I know everyone here IS. No flame bait, trolling or disrespect in anyway meant.


OR go to college get a degree in architecture with your 5 years and make 200k a year out of the gate...
Careful! I live with a arch grad student and if you told him the perception is archs make 200k out the door, you would have a straight edge to dig out of your skull. It's funny the misconceptions about careers. People think pilot's make 100k out the door and architects make 200k. He said (this is after 5 years of arch undergrad and grad school) in the first 3-5 years expect to make below 40k. Not until your signature goes on the designs do you make more. Hmm, sounds a like aviation, especially right seat vs left seat. I may have just disproved my entire argument above. Your post was made while I was typing the first part. Doggonit.

minimwage4 04-13-2010 08:36 AM


Originally Posted by TwinTurboPilot (Post 795044)
raising the minimum requirements wont change the pay. 10-15 years ago you needed 2500TT to even get looked to fly right seat in a Beech 1900. Guess what there was no shortage of applicants and the pay still sucked.

You're forgetting one thing.., that was back then, when paying dues meant something because something good was waiting for you at the end. No one in their right mind would chase this bus driver job now unless there is significant improvement in everything. Raising mins will only help against past company tactics of hiring SJS labor. You can't blame the low timers we all would do the same if an RJ is dangled in front of us, but we can take away the ability of companies to be able to hire them in an effort to keep wages low. There needs to be a level of respect and sense of worth that management has to feel in order for us to be taken seriously at the negotiating table.

CANAM 04-13-2010 08:39 AM

If your aircraft says Express, Connection, Link, Eagle, ect., on the side, your company will have to bid on that flying. Capitalism dictates the lowest bidder will get the contract, so your company had better be VERY competitive in today's market economy. So long as another company will underbid your company, the pay will not go up. Sorry.

minimwage4 04-13-2010 08:42 AM


Originally Posted by asims33 (Post 795061)
Hmm i just read about the RLA

It says major strikes are only allowed when all other methods of dispute have been exhausted. And you may only strike on a large scale when you are striking to resolve a major issue.

The RLA seems to have a lot of loose ends :p

The RLA is a complete disaster for us. I am surprised there hasn't been an uprising. What profession do you know of where you're paid less than what someone in the same position made 20 years ago? The RLA assures that.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:07 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands