![]() |
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 803838)
Maybe you are right, but as someone said before about UAL/CAL doing away with all current 70 seaters, that is just not possible. That would be too much of a financial shock for the new airline.
|
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 803815)
I see expressjet worse off out of anyone, I say this because they will have the biggest piece of the pie at about 240 50 seaters, and I think that can be cut down when parts of their contract come up. Didn’t their cal contract say that the 215 planes they have now can be taken down to 190 or something and didn't their UAL contract state that their 30 can be dropped down to 20? Expressjet will have more 50 seaters flying for UAL/CAL than all the other airlines’ fleets combined. That and CAL has made it their mission to screw expressjet at every turn and now that CAL management is taking over UAL I don’t see that changing.
The bottom line is, with XJT doing more regional flying than anyone else at either carrier, there is no way the new airline will pay for 190 50 seaters to fly around for another 5 years without doing something about it. Also let me add, XJT just got a pretty good size contract with UAL within the past few months. If UAL was planning on merging with CAL and getting rid of XJT, why would they sign a 5 year contract with them so recently? |
Originally Posted by iPilot
(Post 803964)
All they need is a stipulation that all +50 contracts will not be renewed. As they expire, the aircraft transition to mainline service. It would be a sore deal for the regionals but would smoothly transition the planes back to mainline.
|
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 804046)
Also let me add, XJT just got a pretty good size contract with UAL within the past few months. If UAL was planning on merging with CAL and getting rid of XJT, why would they sign a 5 year contract with them so recently?
Actually they might have deliberately entered into that contract to use it as a scope placeholder against labor..."but we just signed a contract with them, we cannot afford to buy them out of it this early" |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 804071)
Nobody is planning on getting rid of any regional right away...it will take several years just to settle the terms of the SLI, then a few more for implementation. Five years is not long in the grand scheme of things...if they need to ax XJT, they will have time to do it.
Actually they might have deliberately entered into that contract to use it as a scope placeholder against labor..."but we just signed a contract with them, we cannot afford to buy them out of it this early" |
UAL and CO pilots have the last chance to rein in on scope and take back flying to mainline UAL and CO pilots. If they don't, then expect the same fiasco UAL management brought upon UAL pilots for the last 10 years.
The days of the 50 seat and possibly 70 plus seat RJ flying is coming to a fast close. I think 100 seat aircraft should replace most of the domestic flying for mainline flights and UAL/CO pilots better make sure 100 seat flying is to be done by UAL/CO pilots, otherwise their junior pilots are doomed. They should be prepared to fight tooth and nail on this one issue. They may even have to fight their own senior wide body CAs on this one. |
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 804046)
Also let me add, XJT just got a pretty good size contract with UAL within the past few months. If UAL was planning on merging with CAL and getting rid of XJT, why would they sign a 5 year contract with them so recently? |
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 804046)
The bottom line is, with XJT doing more regional flying than anyone else at either carrier, there is no way the new airline will pay for 190 50 seaters to fly around for another 5 years without doing something about it.
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 804046)
A few things: First, CALs current contract with XJT has a 2 for 1 replacment clause to bring in larger aircraft to replace the 50 seaters. Second, the former CEO at CAL and the former CEO of XJT had the beef, niether one of them is still there. Third, XJTs contract can't be touched for another 5 years. Finally, why is no one mentioning that the new XJT CEO came from UAL as the former VP of United Express operations? You think thats a coincidence? I guess we'll see.
Its no secret that XJT is in financial ruin, every quarter is loss. XJT’s new ceo also specialized in taking companies in and out of bankruptcy. It seems that is the only thing that could save xjt right now and that’s why I think they got that new ceo. I hate to sound like a broken record but the XJT mec made a big mistake not making a deal with skywest and allowing the buyout 2 years ago. You guys would be in much better shape and have a much better future. |
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 804089)
CO/UAL wil probably just retire 50 seaters and replace them with current 70 seaters. There is plenty of overlap and I wouldn't expect CLE to be around very long.
|
deleted.... not worth it
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:31 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands