![]() |
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 804075)
Do you realize the magnitude of the feed we're talking about replacing? XJT operates nearly 250 airframes for the combined carrier. We're not talking about some small little regional that operates 20 or 30 airframes here. Somebody would have to do a lot of hiring and a lot of a/c buying to replace these routes. XJT currently dominates IAH and EWR for CAL. They operate far more flights than even mainline. I guess if they tighten scope back up all these jobs could be filled by furloughed UAL and CAL guys. In the end that would honestly be the best thing for everyone.
|
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 804571)
Delta is "right sizing" CVG into non-existance. It will be gone as a hub in the next year or two. The ER category will be moving to SEA in the next few months. DET is too close and a much better hub.
|
Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
(Post 804578)
What would be really nice would be to purchase the regional companies and merge with the mainline. No training required and service would not be interrupted. In the long term I believe it would be cheaper than outsourcing.
|
Originally Posted by blastoff
(Post 804309)
As of May 1, XJT will have 32 A/C flying for UAL...with the 10 "temporary" jets looking not so "temporary."
Originally Posted by blastoff
(Post 804311)
So you're saying that Hanley having been VP United Express and US Air Express, and the man who spearheaded RAH's purchase of E170's has nothing to do with it. Seeing as its no secret that XJT's board of directors desperately want: 1) UAL flying, 2) US Air Flying 3) E170's and you still can't see why they chose him?
He restructured a coal company and that's what you're basing your opinion on? "Specialized" in bankruptcy after taking one Coal Company back to profitability...right.:cool: |
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 803815)
That and CAL has made it their mission to screw expressjet at every turn and now that CAL management is taking over UAL I don’t see that changing.
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 804089)
I hate to sound like a broken record but the XJT mec made a big mistake not making a deal with skywest and allowing the buyout 2 years ago. You guys would be in much better shape and have a much better future.
|
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 804708)
Thanks in part to SKW.The SKW deal: Close down branded and DAL prorate agreement - was bound to happen anyways; Close down charter; Transfer the 10 a/c CPA to SKW airlines; Transfer 25 a/c to Skywest airlines for a CPA with CAL; Fourlough 700 pilots (we furloughed less than half of that); Take a 16% paycut to include PBS, getting rid of our defined contribution retirement plan, and other work rule changes equal to 4% paycut in the future after they had a chance to study our contract ("to bring us down to parity with SKW pilots"); Maintain seperate operations with seperate seniority lists without the ability to bid over with a/c in case they were transferee over to ASA or SKW (same clause SKW and ASA pilots have in the ASA contract); negotiate rates for Q400s. What they offered: 15 yr CPA for 205 a/c that was going to be up to bid in 12 months; inclusion in the SKW profit sharing and performance bonus plans; preferential (not guaranteed) interviews for furloughed pilots (to fly the same a/c and routes they are currently flying but at the bottom of a non-union seniority list at first yr SKW pay).
|
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 804089)
CO/UAL wil probably just retire 50 seaters and replace them with current 70 seaters. There is plenty of overlap and I wouldn't expect CLE to be around very long.
Highly unlikely unless they can re-negotiate the leases. CAL/UAL can't just park/retire 50 seaters without substantial penalties. The ones DAL are parking are up on the leases, and that's why they're getting parked. There is also still a market for the 50 seater. It may be a smaller market, but it still exists. Also, it's highely unlikely that more 70 seaters will majically appear, & less likely they will all go to Skywest/GoJets. Many CAL/UAL pilots have seen lives destroyed by the outsourced flying & you can bet the outsourcing is over. |
I highly doubt if additional scope language is seen at all. Anything over 70 seats flown at Mainline. NO additional RJ's flown by the regionals is what I would expect.
|
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 804686)
You can bet those "temporary" 10 planes will be gone as soon as possible, after the merger.
Get used to seeing XJT wearing "your" colors. You're not the only big kid on the block anymore and it obviously bothers you.
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 804686)
THe problem with your thinking is that xjt is a money losing operation, before any financing for any new aircraft can be secured that money losing company needs to be set back to profitibilty, the only way right now is chpt 11. You guys need to wake up and stop drinking the ALPA coolaid otherwise you will be the new comair. In the last 80 years of Aviation, when has profitability prevented airlines from acquiring airframes? You see, there's no Koolaid here; it's still not a rosy picture. However, XJT is very close to break-even...still not in a great position, but better than the picture you're painting. Or, we could still be headed to CH 11, but not nearly as fast as you think and far from the only option. Interesting you bring up Comair, since the Comair strike prompted CAL to diversify its regional feed, a merger with UAL would put the lion's share of feed at both SKW and XJT, but diversified nonetheless. Thanks for your concern :rolleyes: |
All jets should be mainline, Turboprops with Connect, Express, or Link painted on the side should be wholly owned by the parent company. Stop the whipsaw. Train to one standard, seamless service... Novel idea.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands