![]() |
guys guys guys...don't let slapdouche get your goat...dont let him win!
|
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 805659)
I agree, united just got about 200 more obsolete 50 seaters and I doubt they want to keep them.
The pressrelase today said that most of the growth for this new airline will be on the regional level and with 70 seaters. I really hope skywest pushes hard for this flying and i think we are entitled to it with all the money and jobs we've given to united and their furloughed pilots. |
What do you think will happen with Commute Air?
|
Originally Posted by bernouli
(Post 805720)
shameful..............
BTW, after years of observing slappy I have almost come to the conclusion that he is a bitter ex-SLC asa pilot who just enjoys stirring the pot. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 805751)
Don't feed the troll, boys.
BTW, after years of observing slappy I have almost come to the conclusion that he is a bitter ex-SLC asa pilot who just enjoys stirring the pot. |
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 805659)
I agree, united just got about 200 more obsolete 50 seaters and I doubt they want to keep them.
The pressrelase today said that most of the growth for this new airline will be on the regional level and with 70 seaters. I really hope skywest pushes hard for this flying and i think we are entitled to it with all the money and jobs we've given to united and their furloughed pilots. |
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 805659)
I agree, united just got about 200 more obsolete 50 seaters and I doubt they want to keep them.
The pressrelase today said that most of the growth for this new airline will be on the regional level and with 70 seaters. I really hope skywest pushes hard for this flying and i think we are entitled to it with all the money and jobs we've given to united and their furloughed pilots. Dude you need to listen to yourself. I feel bad for the SKW pilots on this board because you are giving them a horrible reputation. If UAL was so against 50 seaters, why would they just sign contracts with SKW, ASA, and XJT for more of them? To replace Mesa of course, but if they didn't want any more 50 seat flying then they wouldn't have replaced this flying with 5+ year deals for 50 seaters. Also, you need to get rid of your horrible attitude toward XJT. Did they reject you or something? One week ago TO THE DAY that the merger was announced, XJT announced a new CEO who came from UAL as the VP of regional operations. You think thats a coincidence? Obviously they expect them to be a major player in RJ flying for the new carrier. You think SKW is entitled to more flying? They have the most to lose as you guys WERE the biggest regional for UAL. Just talked to a friend of mine at XJT who does MX and they just started an E-170 CBT. Again, coincidence? So lets go over this, XJT gets a new CEO who happens to be the ex VP of United Express Ops at UAL (and bought the original 170's for Shuttle America when he was their president). One week later the merger is announced. XJT recently gets a five year contract with UAL. The combined carrier (UAL and CAL) now own 30% of XJT who is now the largest regional operator for the combined carrier (yep thats right, SKW is no longer the largest. Sorry Slappy). Finally, XJT MX recently gets handed an E-170 CBT and is told to "be prepared". Does this sound like the end for XJT and that SKW is getting more flying? As many others have said, get a clue broski. |
ASA MX was given the 900 CBT's 5 years before one was on property....that doesn't prove entirely too much JetBlast
|
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 805813)
Dude you need to listen to yourself. I feel bad for the SKW pilots on this board because you are giving them a horrible reputation. If UAL was so against 50 seaters, why would they just sign contracts with SKW, ASA, and XJT for more of them? To replace Mesa of course, but if they didn't want any more 50 seat flying then they wouldn't have replaced this flying with 5+ year deals for 50 seaters. Also, you need to get rid of your horrible attitude toward XJT. Did they reject you or something? One week ago TO THE DAY that the merger was announced, XJT announced a new CEO who came from UAL as the VP of regional operations. You think thats a coincidence? Obviously they expect them to be a major player in RJ flying for the new carrier. You think SKW is entitled to more flying? They have the most to lose as you guys WERE the biggest regional for UAL. Just talked to a friend of mine at XJT who does MX and they just started an E-170 CBT. Again, coincidence?
So lets go over this, XJT gets a new CEO who happens to be the ex VP of United Express Ops at UAL (and bought the original 170's for Shuttle America when he was their president). One week later the merger is announced. XJT recently gets a five year contract with UAL. The combined carrier (UAL and CAL) now own 30% of XJT who is now the largest regional operator for the combined carrier (yep thats right, SKW is no longer the largest. Sorry Slappy). Finally, XJT MX recently gets handed an E-170 CBT and is told to "be prepared". Does this sound like the end for XJT and that SKW is getting more flying? As many others have said, get a clue broski. |
I hope XJT gets all the flying... I'm tired of not being able to get vacation here at SKW and honestly don't want to see the block hours increase anymore without hiring (which we all know won't happen). Take it. Enjoy it. Sometimes I wish the fish wouldn't always smell his paws...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands