![]() |
Plus the fleet wouldn't be that big, the majority of 50 seaters probably wouldn't make it and would be parked until oil fell back to below $40-$50bb.
Anotherwords, you'd see a net reduction in jobs. Unless you started replacing 50 seaters with 50 seat TPs. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 863709)
FWIW, the majority see's the CRJ700 and sees an annoyance, the CRJ900 and they see a threat, and the EMB175 as a WTH?
Had the EMB175 not been built, this would've garnered a lot less attention. Now to see a jet that is not an extended RJ flying and not a range limited BAE146 around for someone else, has gotten a lot of attention. Especially at UAL. Heck, the CAL pilots see the Dash 8-400s as a direct 735 replacement and they're right. And again, management, not to thrilled to have funded CHQ turned RAH turned Midwest and Frontier. I think next time they'll cut the next "we'll go it alone!" at the knees before they have the money to pull off purchasing profitable planes. |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 863717)
Air Canada pilots fly the E175 and up.
|
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 863717)
Air Canada pilots fly the E175 and up.
|
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
(Post 862739)
Sometimes I have to laugh at this forum. There are post after post about how "Its all mainlines fault we outsourced RJ's". Ok, let's just assume thats true, and forget about the fact that the UAL 70 seat giveaway was voted in with the threat of a CH11 imposed contract that had ZERO scope in it as the alternative. Almost every regional pilot now flying got their job at the expense of a mainline job. So now there is a move to eliminate that flying, and get those jobs back, and what happens? We read posts like this.
Lawsuit? Based on WHAT? You exist at the mercy of UAL/CAL management. Your job is not owed to you, and you are not entitled to it. You want DOH at mainline if the RJs are brought in house??? Bwahahahahahahahahahhahahaa!!! I don't see any mainline furloughed guys with DOH at Expressjet. Expressjet operates on a contract with UAL and CAL. If that contract is phased out or eliminated when it expires, what are you going to base your lawsuit on? |
Originally Posted by XJT Pilot
(Post 863726)
You miss the point but got one right, your not entitled to you job either at my expense, I agree the contracts can go away and they might; however, its not gona happen during this merger between CAL/UAL...With our merger with Skywest/ASA/XJT that makes 7000 pilots the fourth larget group within ALPA (less skywest not union) now i'm not a finger pointer but ALPA is not gona give that money up to protect anyones job...its about money and you and I can only go along for the ride...lawsuit, not from me it would be from the RJ operators, there not giving up without a fight, more then likely with the new regs. coming down the legacys will have to purchase the RJ operators just to fill the cockpit seats, but thats just me rambling....lookout things are a changing and it aint gona be easy on anyone...
|
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 863729)
You're mis-informed, Skywest will not be part of an asa/xjt merger. It has been agreed upon by managment and the xjt mec.
I am guessing JA told them he wants to get this deal done asap because he has a limited opportunity to purchase Comair, which will give him 80% of the Delta flying to go along with the new United flying. He has a ton of cash on hand (1 billion) so it is going to be hard for him to not agree to a very progressive contract to the new ASA now that ALPA played nice. Even Prater went to his temple and shook hands, would have loverd to see that handshake. We then get the ALPA Comair on our list when he buys it. And if he can't pay for it he will just throw the rest of SKYWEST healthcare out and trash their work rules to pay for it. Just a rumor. |
Originally Posted by XJT Pilot
(Post 863726)
You miss the point but got one right, your not entitled to you job either at my expense,
Originally Posted by XJT Pilot
(Post 863726)
I agree the contracts can go away and they might; however, its not gona happen during this merger between CAL/UAL...With our merger with Skywest/ASA/XJT that makes 7000 pilots the fourth larget group within ALPA (less skywest not union) now i'm not a finger pointer but ALPA is not gona give that money up to protect anyones job...its about money and you and I can only go along for the ride...
I mean if you're not going to have a whipsaw then the cost advantage is gone which means more opportunity for people who want to go to a mainline carrier then there is now. Or worse, what's to stop airlines from funding a new Part 121 carrier, Commutair or reformed MESA, to start flying larger aircraft and restart the whipsaw? Get it in house, its better for everyone but the lifers who are going to ruin it for a lot of people. |
Originally Posted by XJT Pilot
(Post 863726)
You miss the point but got one right, your not entitled to you job either at my expense, I agree the contracts can go away and they might; however, its not gona happen during this merger between CAL/UAL...With our merger with Skywest/ASA/XJT that makes 7000 pilots the fourth larget group within ALPA (less skywest not union) now i'm not a finger pointer but ALPA is not gona give that money up to protect anyones job...its about money and you and I can only go along for the ride...lawsuit, not from me it would be from the RJ operators, there not giving up without a fight, more then likely with the new regs. coming down the legacys will have to purchase the RJ operators just to fill the cockpit seats, but thats just me rambling....lookout things are a changing and it aint gona be easy on anyone...
Lawsuits can be filed all day long by the RJ operators, but at the end of the day, they operate within their contract at the whim of their mainline parent's management. When the contract expires, if UAL doesn't renew the deal due to scope issues negotiated with the UAL/CAL pilots, there isn't anything to sue about! It's totally legal. Look, I know how it feels to have your job threatened. I've lived this way every day for a over a decade since the wheels came off in 2000, watching friends get furloughed (twice), wondering if we are going to cease to exist, all the while watching more and more RJ's in our colors come in and take over flying that we used to do. I'm a former commuter guy, so I know the drill. During this time its been mega expansion, quick upgrades, and bigger and better equipment for regional pilots....good news for the percentage that want to have a career there. Pretending that ALPA is going to somehow step in and make a change one way or another is something I wouldn't hold my breath on. For individual airlines, ALPA is that pilot group, and they will look out for their own self interests. ALPA National won't factor into this decision. Now, what will happen? Who knows. I've got my own guess, but at our MEC's request, I don't talk about it in public. I do know that the first section that I'll be turning to in the eventual TA is going to be Scope. Of course I'm not entitled to my job! But for the first time in a VERY long time, I see an opportunity to take back some of the painful, horrific, life-changing losses we've endured. I'm pretty confident the 11000 pilots of CAL/UAL all pretty much feel the same way. Good luck to us all. |
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 863701)
You're right. The +/- 1400 furloughees ar United are the wild card I hadn't considered. They'd probably take such a deal just to get back to mainline.
But that's only 1400 pilots. Where they get the other 5000 or so pilots flying RJs in UAL or CAL colors from? They can't interview, hire, and train that fast. it would have to be a staple. The proposal had the regional flying phased out over time. It wasn't a flip the switch type of deal. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands