Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Republic guys... (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/53471-republic-guys.html)

FLEX 09-19-2010 06:47 AM


Originally Posted by sizzlechest (Post 872866)
It is flying on the YX certificate. All YX flying is to be done by pilots covered by RAH CBA. Lynx pilots are not on the RAH SL yet. They cannot fly the Q if it is on the YX certificate. They should then refuse to fly the Q that they are not qualified to do. There are no provisions to have 2 separate pilot groups under in airline certificate. For Lynx to fly that is divisive and illegal and wrong. This is why they should refuse the flying as they are HELPING bust up the RAH CBA/pilot group.... they are helping MGT in a war AGAINST the pilot group by refusing to follow CBA.

It is amazing how you justify your shortcomings but show no tolerance when others do the same thing. Divisive and illegal and wrong are very strong words. Thankfully RAH pilots and the IBT are righteous and beyond reproach so you can educate the rest of us.

Flyboyrw 09-19-2010 07:50 AM


Originally Posted by FLEX (Post 872875)
It is amazing how you justify your shortcomings but show no tolerance when others do the same thing. Divisive and illegal and wrong are very strong words. Thankfully RAH pilots and the IBT are righteous and beyond reproach so you can educate the rest of us.

Exactly, getting a taste of their own medicine.

Sucks when you get screwed doesn't it?

sizzlechest 09-19-2010 08:22 AM

The irony of my post is that the same wheel keeps going around and around and around. People will ***** when it's against them and then defend it when it helps them. i don't really care what happens it doesn't affect me, i am not RAH. i am glad to know that the new EXCO is starting to make a change and be more open. maybe it will trigger expedited arbitration for a new CBA or something as it should be classified as a major violation or dispute. We will see what happens. my buddy said that Midwest asked for 2 more days extension on the SLI closing briefs... and those guys *****ed about RAH dragging feet.... irony.

Flex81 09-19-2010 08:47 AM


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 871882)
Did you actually expect a different result? I personally thought the captains had a chance at a raise, but the first officers pay is based on "all jet aircraft." You are also looking at probably close to 5 years until you see a new contract if not longer.

This is a little scary. Hopefully it doesn't take 5 years, but when we get the SLI finished and get approved for single carrier status, we will need to get the IBT out of there. You want it to take 5 years, stay with the IBT.

Vote RAPA

Dougdrvr 09-19-2010 09:24 AM


Originally Posted by sizzlechest (Post 872866)
It is flying on the YX certificate. All YX flying is to be done by pilots covered by RAH CBA. Lynx pilots are not on the RAH SL yet. They cannot fly the Q if it is on the YX certificate. They should then refuse to fly the Q that they are not qualified to do. There are no provisions to have 2 separate pilot groups under in airline certificate. For Lynx to fly that is divisive and illegal and wrong. This is why they should refuse the flying as they are HELPING bust up the RAH CBA/pilot group.... they are helping MGT in a war AGAINST the pilot group by refusing to follow CBA.

There is no YX certificate.

Trogdor 09-19-2010 09:49 AM


Originally Posted by sizzlechest (Post 872866)
It is flying on the YX certificate. All YX flying is to be done by pilots covered by RAH CBA. Lynx pilots are not on the RAH SL yet. They cannot fly the Q if it is on the YX certificate. They should then refuse to fly the Q that they are not qualified to do. There are no provisions to have 2 separate pilot groups under in airline certificate. For Lynx to fly that is divisive and illegal and wrong. This is why they should refuse the flying as they are HELPING bust up the RAH CBA/pilot group.... they are helping MGT in a war AGAINST the pilot group by refusing to follow CBA.

This from a guy who is stealing jobs from the Midwest pilots. You're a real class act.

sizzlechest 09-19-2010 04:07 PM


Originally Posted by Dougdrvr (Post 872910)
There is no YX certificate.


the ATA code now =Republic Airlines Inc., hence the YX certificate

sizzlechest 09-19-2010 04:09 PM


Originally Posted by Trogdor (Post 872913)
This from a guy who is stealing jobs from the Midwest pilots. You're a real class act.

read all the posts first ,I said i wasn't RAH....

Dougdrvr 09-19-2010 04:35 PM


Originally Posted by sizzlechest (Post 872988)
the ATA code now =Republic Airlines Inc., hence the YX certificate

There is no YX certificate. It was turned in to the FAA. I didn't think it was possible but, ostensibly, you can have an ATA code (YX) without an air carrier certificate.

ToiletDuck 09-19-2010 05:50 PM


Originally Posted by HawkerJet (Post 872771)
Nope, if you have a dog in this fight look into it.

I've read with my own eyes a .pdf copy of the unions official response to the company wanting to do this. Perhaps you should do some digging yourself.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands