![]() |
Originally Posted by mooney
(Post 1053080)
yeah there's like 4 schools that have an agreement with 9e that if you have a certain GPA and less than a certain number of failed checks you get on with 9e with no interview.....
I've graduated from a French Engeneering school. I am not even sure they will recognize it (to be equivalent to a college degree) and consider me for interview with my low time 830/51, LOL. |
Originally Posted by BaronRouge380
(Post 1053086)
I've heard this before, unbelievable, not even an interview!
I've graduated from a French Engeneering school. I am not even sure they will recognize it (to be equivalent to a college degree) and consider me for interview with my low time 830/51, LOL. |
Originally Posted by mooney
(Post 1053077)
only you......:o We now have 2 "spanky's" at Pinnacle.....
|
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 1053033)
I was told this issue if an FAA minimums mandate on the Colgan certificate. 9E doesn't have a minimum, neither does Mesaba. That's where the issue lies. If it was between the union and company it would be a simple (and immediate) LOA.
|
The solution is really easy... you give super-seniority to the pinnacle guys who are under 1000/100... they can't be displaced... then when they get over 1000/100 they go down to where they would've been displaced to... I can't imagine too many pilots being more than a couple months from meeting the time requirements... as much as I disagree with pinnacle's criminal hiring practices, I disagree more with pilots being kicked to the street after being guaranteed a job....
|
Originally Posted by Av8tion
(Post 1053198)
The solution is really easy... you give super-seniority to the pinnacle guys who are under 1000/100... they can't be displaced... then when they get over 1000/100 they go down to where they would've been displaced to... I can't imagine too many pilots being more than a couple months from meeting the time requirements... as much as I disagree with pinnacle's criminal hiring practices, I disagree more with pilots being kicked to the street after being guaranteed a job....
Even easier solution...mandate the ATP/1500 hour minumum rule. Certain GPA and selected school with no interview...what a joke!! |
Originally Posted by Terantious
(Post 1053203)
Even easier solution...mandate the ATP/1500 hour minumum rule. Certain GPA and selected school with no interview...what a joke!!
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 1053210)
and have no applicants and be severely understaffed, yup great solution there.
|
Originally Posted by Terantious
(Post 1053220)
I could really care less about "no applicants", quality vs quantity. I care more about safety than numbers dude. And more low time in-experienced guys hired equates to a higher workload for the left seat when the **** hits the fan.
Exactly...... |
I am sure there will be some who wouldnt think anything about letting them go, minimums are minimums and cutting corners is not cool. With that said they shouldnt be fired because they already have the job but this crappy bridge program needs to go. I do believe they should figure out a way to let them fly the Saab so the people who are here and flying already who have the time can get the higher pay rate. You dont wanna pay your dues before coming here you should get the lowest pay rate but also keep your job.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:05 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands