Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Eagle Cancelling Interviews (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/63814-eagle-cancelling-interviews.html)

buffalopilot 12-02-2011 12:25 PM

Eagle Cancelling Interviews
 
id rather know now than quit my current job and the get furloughed from eagle while in class.

CaptainCarl 12-02-2011 12:30 PM

Is this a statement or a question :confused:

Jwight11 12-02-2011 12:46 PM

It's a statement, I just received an email saying 2012 classes are "on hold."

ifly 12-02-2011 01:01 PM


Originally Posted by Jwight11 (Post 1095381)
It's a statement, I just received an email saying 2012 classes are "on hold."

Uh oh! Bad news! There goes the 700 pilots they plan on hiring next year!

CaptainCarl 12-02-2011 01:17 PM


Originally Posted by Jwight11 (Post 1095381)
It's a statement, I just received an email saying 2012 classes are "on hold."

:( Sorry to hear that y'all.

Red Forman 12-02-2011 01:19 PM

I hope furloughs don't happen, but would not be surprised if they did. It's like Comair a few years ago. They were hiring like gangbusters, and then cancelled interviews, then sent people home who were in class, and then furloughed like gangbusters.

But then again, according to "wingtips", who has been in the industry for less than a year, you are beyond stupid to compare Comair and Eagle.

odog1121 12-02-2011 01:34 PM

Well' lets hope the people scheduled for class in JAN didn't get replaced yet at their old jobs.

Bruno82 12-02-2011 01:36 PM

We'll just have to see what kind of 'fleet adjustments' we get.

meeko031 12-02-2011 04:53 PM


Originally Posted by CaptainCarl (Post 1095403)
:( Sorry to hear that y'all.


no need to be sorry, anyone hired before oct 2011 will have a job with aa. So we'll be alright! oh wait!!!!! I guess I should start on making a sign and join occupy wall street!!!

....another round please, bartender!

rickair7777 12-02-2011 05:32 PM

This is a good example of why you never give more than the accepted minimum two weeks notice in aviation, unless you have a very special relationship with the employer. Once you resign, they don't have to let you un-resign.

snippercr 12-02-2011 07:47 PM

I think the writing is on the wall. Remember back in 2008 when Eagle was hiring people with wet commercials? Everything was going great, then suddenly classes were cancelled, then a little while later people went on furlough. Only 71 last time, wonder what the magic number will be this time?

rbtower2 12-02-2011 08:12 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 1095567)
This is a good example of why you never give more than the accepted minimum two weeks notice in aviation, unless you have a very special relationship with the employer. Once you resign, they don't have to let you un-resign.

The problem with Eagle is as soon as they give you your tentative offer they fax out something to your current employer asking for a performance evaluation so they basically force your hand telling your current employer you are planning on going to Eagle. I was going to wait untill after I passed the regional jet course and got a firm class date before giving my notice to my employer but that went right out the window when they recieved the performance evaluation.

ERJF15 12-02-2011 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by rbtower2 (Post 1095660)
The problem with Eagle is as soon as they give you your tentative offer they fax out something to your current employer asking for a performance evaluation so they basically force your hand telling your current employer you are planning on going to Eagle. I was going to wait untill after I passed the regional jet course and got a firm class date before giving my notice to my employer but that went right out the window when they recieved the performance evaluation.

This would happen with any company that was hiring and then was put in our current situation. That the nature of the biz. Lesson 1.

PIPErdrvr 12-03-2011 11:05 PM


Originally Posted by rbtower2 (Post 1095660)
The problem with Eagle is as soon as they give you your tentative offer they fax out something to your current employer asking for a performance evaluation so they basically force your hand telling your current employer you are planning on going to Eagle. I was going to wait untill after I passed the regional jet course and got a firm class date before giving my notice to my employer but that went right out the window when they recieved the performance evaluation.

Except you can't start the course until your employer responds to the request... And you have passed CAs board. If you were paying attention during the morning brief, you would have caught that. Good luck getting back to HPN. Hope the hotel didn't run ya too high

paintyourjet 12-03-2011 11:47 PM

How about all the nice guys at NetJets who quit their good job to return to their furloughed United job a few years back....only to get the shaft....sure would suck to quit a good job for AE and get furloughed soon after.

meeko031 12-04-2011 04:13 AM


Originally Posted by ERJF15 (Post 1095674)
That the nature of the biz. Lesson 1.


what he said


Originally Posted by paintyourjet (Post 1096173)
sure would suck to quit a good job for AE and get furloughed soon after.

this could happen with any career or job

frmrdashtrash 12-04-2011 05:11 AM


Originally Posted by Red Forman (Post 1095406)
But then again, according to "wingtips", who has been in the industry for less than a year, you are beyond stupid to compare Comair and Eagle.

Same thing I was told in '06 when I compare Comair to Piedmont.

Good luck Eagle guys. Hope this turns out better.

frmrdashtrash 12-04-2011 05:13 AM


Originally Posted by paintyourjet (Post 1096173)
How about all the nice guys at NetJets who quit their good job to return to their furloughed United job a few years back....only to get the shaft....sure would suck to quit a good job for AE and get furloughed soon after.

They'd have been furlughed at NJA, or at best working for a company who no longer cares about it's product. That might work in the 121 world, but it's not going to in the fractional world. NJA isn't anything like it used to be.

IlliniPilot99 12-04-2011 06:28 AM

early projects say parking 30-100 aircraft(mostly 135/140's)....source from about 1 check airmen and 2 in the training department...

good luck

Tom a Hawk 12-04-2011 06:34 AM

I had interviews scheduled with comair and eagle in the late spring/early summer of 2008....they both went away. Worked at the flight school for another two years after that...

RJ Pilot 12-04-2011 06:55 AM


Originally Posted by IlliniPilot99 (Post 1096254)
early projects say parking 30-100 aircraft(mostly 135/140's)....source from about 1 check airmen and 2 in the training department...

good luck

Yes they know:rolleyes:...Im not saying thats possible, but those guys usually dont have a clue.

cantwin 12-04-2011 07:50 AM


Originally Posted by IlliniPilot99 (Post 1096254)
early projects say parking 30-100 aircraft(mostly 135/140's)....source from about 1 check airmen and 2 in the training department...

good luck

Big deal... that's just their opinion.

Nobody knows. Just sit back and wait to see what happens.. nothing any pilot can do about it anyway.

DashGirl 12-04-2011 09:16 AM


Originally Posted by rbtower2 (Post 1095660)
The problem with Eagle is as soon as they give you your tentative offer they fax out something to your current employer asking for a performance evaluation so they basically force your hand telling your current employer you are planning on going to Eagle. I was going to wait untill after I passed the regional jet course and got a firm class date before giving my notice to my employer but that went right out the window when they recieved the performance evaluation.

I am not an HR expert but I do know a little about labor laws and I don't think a "performance evaluation" is widely legal beyond.."Did so and so work there as a pilot?" and "Would you rehire this person?" The only other type of info that they can share are your training records via PRIA. I'd be really surprised that a company as large as Eagle would want to risk any discriminatory liability issues by asking too much of a current or former employer. And as I already stated, most companies won't say much on an inquiry like that anyway for their own liability concerns. Almost everywhere I have worked has had a "neutral reference policy" in place for this sort of thing.

In nearly every state it is illegal to make any disparaging or negative remarks about a current or former employer to a new prospective employer beyond "no we would no rehire this person." Though there are holdouts like Illinois.

So I doubt such an evaluation is going out but I am probably wrong. But more towards the point, it is not reasonable for a person to expect to be able to keep their job search a secret from their current airline in such an industry. And frankly, as uncaring for individuals positively or negatively as regional airlines are, to worry about your current one knowing you are looking or potentially leaving is a little paranoid. They don't care about you as to them you are nothing more then a number on a seniority list.

rbtower2 12-04-2011 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by DashGirl (Post 1096343)
I am not an HR expert but I do know a little about labor laws and I don't think a "performance evaluation" is widely legal beyond.."Did so and so work there as a pilot?" and "Would you rehire this person?" The only other type of info that they can share are your training records via PRIA. I'd be really surprised that a company as large as Eagle would want to risk any discriminatory liability issues by asking too much of a current or former employer. And as I already stated, most companies won't say much on an inquiry like that anyway for their own liability concerns. Almost everywhere I have worked has had a "neutral reference policy" in place for this sort of thing.

In nearly every state it is illegal to make any disparaging or negative remarks about a current or former employer to a new prospective employer beyond "no we would no rehire this person." Though there are holdouts like Illinois.

So I doubt such an evaluation is going out but I am probably wrong. But more towards the point, it is not reasonable for a person to expect to be able to keep their job search a secret from their current airline in such an industry. And frankly, as uncaring for individuals positively or negatively as regional airlines are, to worry about your current one knowing you are looking or potentially leaving is a little paranoid. They don't care about you as to them you are nothing more then a number on a seniority list.

I never said I currently work for an airline. I work in an office so Im not just a number. And they are sending the evaluation out. I saw it and my supervisor saw it because he had to send it back to them via fax. With that being said now Im in a position where I have to ask for my old job back because I got called for training and then eagle canceled. luckily I didnt burn any bridges at my current job so they are gonna see if they can get me back on even though they hired my replacement already

pagey 12-04-2011 12:55 PM


Originally Posted by DashGirl (Post 1096343)
I am not an HR expert but I do know a little about labor laws and I don't think a "performance evaluation" is widely legal beyond.."Did so and so work there as a pilot?" and "Would you rehire this person?" The only other type of info that they can share are your training records via PRIA. I'd be really surprised that a company as large as Eagle would want to risk any discriminatory liability issues by asking too much of a current or former employer. And as I already stated, most companies won't say much on an inquiry like that anyway for their own liability concerns. Almost everywhere I have worked has had a "neutral reference policy" in place for this sort of thing.

In nearly every state it is illegal to make any disparaging or negative remarks about a current or former employer to a new prospective employer beyond "no we would no rehire this person." Though there are holdouts like Illinois.

So I doubt such an evaluation is going out but I am probably wrong. But more towards the point, it is not reasonable for a person to expect to be able to keep their job search a secret from their current airline in such an industry. And frankly, as uncaring for individuals positively or negatively as regional airlines are, to worry about your current one knowing you are looking or potentially leaving is a little paranoid. They don't care about you as to them you are nothing more then a number on a seniority list.


They have you sign a waiver that says they can ask....

DashGirl 12-04-2011 01:48 PM


Originally Posted by rbtower2 (Post 1096414)
I never said I currently work for an airline. I work in an office so Im not just a number. And they are sending the evaluation out. I saw it and my supervisor saw it because he had to send it back to them via fax. With that being said now Im in a position where I have to ask for my old job back because I got called for training and then eagle canceled. luckily I didnt burn any bridges at my current job so they are gonna see if they can get me back on even though they hired my replacement already

Fair enough


Originally Posted by pagey (Post 1096415)
They have you sign a waiver that says they can ask....

*facepalm*

hurricanechaser 12-04-2011 03:30 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 1095567)
This is a good example of why you never give more than the accepted minimum two weeks notice in aviation, unless you have a very special relationship with the employer. Once you resign, they don't have to let you un-resign.

I would have to agree with RickAir on this one

I might go as far as to tell my employer I'm going on vacation for a few weeks till I know for sure its a solid deal. That's if you can ask for one. Maybe go sick for awhile???

DashDriverYV 12-04-2011 03:55 PM

Dashgirl not illegal to say disparaging things, just not smart. There is a civil risk of libel and slander so most companies have a policy of not being specific. If you were a bad employee and it was documented there is no confidentiality required.

Twin Wasp 12-04-2011 04:07 PM


Originally Posted by hurricanechaser (Post 1096485)
I might go as far as to tell my employer I'm going on vacation for a few weeks till I know for sure its a solid deal. That's if you can ask for one. Maybe go sick for awhile???

Be careful with that, people have been fired from their new job when the company found out they still had the old job. They go from having 2 jobs to none. Probably comes from the "outside flying" clause in most company's GOM.

DashGirl 12-04-2011 04:11 PM


Originally Posted by Twin Wasp (Post 1096502)
Be careful with that, people have been fired from their new job when the company found out they still had the old job. They go from having 2 jobs to none. Probably comes from the "outside flying" clause in most company's GOM.

That actually depends a great deal on where you live. In Ohio, it is absolutely illegal to provide negative information on a former employee beyond what I already mentioned.

ATOP40 12-04-2011 04:34 PM


Originally Posted by DashDriverYV (Post 1096497)
Dashgirl not illegal to say disparaging things, just not smart. There is a civil risk of libel and slander so most companies have a policy of not being specific. If you were a bad employee and it was documented there is no confidentiality required.

It is only libel or slander if it is not the truth. Telling someone you think they are dishonest is legal. Telling someone they stole something from you and you did not could be slander if you can prove that it is the sole reason you were damaged from that statement. Very difficult to prove in the interview environment especially for pilots because so many aspects of an applicant are considered.

It is not legal to ask some particular questions but not illegal to share an opinion of someone. There are nasty people in this world and a few of them are pilots. Most airlines have given their pilots an opportunity to share their opinions of applicants to make the best decisions in choosing the best available people. None of that is illegal.

prex8390 12-12-2011 03:05 PM

yeah, buddy of mine did his interview they day AMR filed for chapter 11. very next day he gets a call saying his training is pushed back so eagle can "reorganize"

KingBird50 12-12-2011 03:40 PM

AMR Bankruptcy Creates Opening to Speed Flight Cuts at American Eagle Unit - Bloomberg

Todays news.

Low Flyin 12-12-2011 03:50 PM


Originally Posted by DashGirl (Post 1096343)
I am not an HR expert but I do know a little about labor laws and I don't think a "performance evaluation" is widely legal beyond.."Did so and so work there as a pilot?" and "Would you rehire this person?" The only other type of info that they can share are your training records via PRIA. I'd be really surprised that a company as large as Eagle would want to risk any discriminatory liability issues by asking too much of a current or former employer. And as I already stated, most companies won't say much on an inquiry like that anyway for their own liability concerns. Almost everywhere I have worked has had a "neutral reference policy" in place for this sort of thing.

In nearly every state it is illegal to make any disparaging or negative remarks about a current or former employer to a new prospective employer beyond "no we would no rehire this person." Though there are holdouts like Illinois.

So I doubt such an evaluation is going out but I am probably wrong. But more towards the point, it is not reasonable for a person to expect to be able to keep their job search a secret from their current airline in such an industry. And frankly, as uncaring for individuals positively or negatively as regional airlines are, to worry about your current one knowing you are looking or potentially leaving is a little paranoid. They don't care about you as to them you are nothing more then a number on a seniority list.

That's one of the reasons I didn't go to Eagle...it's like they basically want you to resign and then hang in limbo until the CA review board. I told them I didn't want them to send out the evaluations to my current employer until I gave them the okay (mainly stalling waiting to get other job offers). They called me every few days badgering me to send out my eval, and saying that "nobody has ever had this problem before" and are you "hiding something" and said they were "doing me a favor so I don't potentially get pulled out of class later"...none of it was true, I just didn't want to risk my job to go chase possible job. Went to SkyWest, and they sent out all of my PRIA/Evals the first day of indoc. The whole HR process really turned me off to working at Eagle.

block30 12-12-2011 03:53 PM


Originally Posted by KingBird50 (Post 1100741)

Is this all just a strong-arm move by management to break current scope agreements in order to make Eagle essentially a mailine carrier but at regional rates? If so, I am sure everyone else is going to follow suit. :mad:

450knotOffice 12-12-2011 04:15 PM

Unlikely. AMR simply wants to their feed to be primarily 70-90 seat jets, just as DAL's and UAL's is now.

XForces 12-12-2011 05:08 PM


Originally Posted by IlliniPilot99 (Post 1096254)
early projects say parking 30-100 aircraft(mostly 135/140's)....source from about 1 check airmen and 2 in the training department...

good luck

Oh No!!

Well, if a check airmen and TWO people in the training department said so......

:rolleyes:

Short Bus Drive 12-12-2011 05:17 PM


Originally Posted by prex8390 (Post 1100731)
yeah, buddy of mine did his interview they day AMR filed for chapter 11. very next day he gets a call saying his training is pushed back so eagle can "reorganize"

WOW!!! He had a training date within a day of an interview!!!
Things sure have changed!

BlueMoon 12-12-2011 06:04 PM


Originally Posted by block30 (Post 1100752)
Is this all just a strong-arm move by management to break current scope agreements in order to make Eagle essentially a mailine carrier but at regional rates? If so, I am sure everyone else is going to follow suit. :mad:

As a former Comair pilot, that article sounded all too familiar. Good luck to you guys, it sucks and I hope it goes better than ours did.

meeko031 12-12-2011 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by block30 (Post 1100752)
Is this all just a strong-arm move by management to break current scope agreements in order to make Eagle essentially a mailine carrier but at regional rates? :mad:



...long story short, yes! only my opinion!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands