![]() |
Originally Posted by sandrich
(Post 1170047)
I really cant tell what this manhood measuring contest is even about anymore, but look up in FAR/AIM ar FAR-FC for the definition of a stabilized approach......oh wait, its not in there.
Thanks for the insight. Enjoying the 1900 for now, but if they put me in Saab class, I wont go kicking and screaming. It is what it is. Wont happen anytime soon, thats for sure. |
Originally Posted by Terrain Inop
(Post 1170071)
A stabilized approach is defined by your company SOP, and it can vary between fleet types.
|
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 1169332)
Anyone with half a brain knew that the Colgan Saabs were on their way out, regardless of BK. Made zero sense to keep a pro-rate operation with an aircraft that was serving as a constant training cycle and mx costs that were skyrocketing.
I am more curious about the viability of the new Saab operation with Silver. Will they be able to keep them cost effective with the mx costs/up keep. It seems that Bloch didn't see that one coming... |
Originally Posted by FuriousG
(Post 1170109)
It seems that Bloch didn't see that one coming...
|
Originally Posted by Colnago
(Post 1169953)
Do you play drums by any chance?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands