Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Objection 2 Delta's DIP financing 4 Pinnacle >

Objection 2 Delta's DIP financing 4 Pinnacle

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Objection 2 Delta's DIP financing 4 Pinnacle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2012 | 06:44 AM
  #11  
Lone Palm's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Port of Indecision and Southwest of Disorder
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Yeah, this motion will be rejected because it would cause Chapter 7. As I've said before, Delta bankrupted us by not paying us for the merger costs. This is because Colgan was integrated in, and Delta was not going to pay for any of that.

Now Delta sees an opportunity here for us and it is not related to parking 200's; The question is, what is that plan? My guess would be it has something to do with Comair.

I agree, Comair could very well be a part of the "big picture."
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 06:50 AM
  #12  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Pinnacolaba to Comacle me thinks!
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 06:58 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Yeah, this motion will be rejected because it would cause Chapter 7. As I've said before, Delta bankrupted us by not paying us for the merger costs. This is because Colgan was integrated in, and Delta was not going to pay for any of that.

Now Delta sees an opportunity here for us and it is not related to parking 200's; The question is, what is that plan? My guess would be it has something to do with Comair.
If I was Delta I wouldn't either. Why would they help Pinnacle operate a/c for United ? When Pinnacle bought Colgan they took a business risk that I'm sure Delta wanted nothing to do with.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:01 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

where did you find these documents that have been docketed? I tried searching on the US Bankruptcy court's website, but couldn't find anything.....
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:16 AM
  #15  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by B00sted
If you look at the 13 week budget Pinnacle posted, as of Friday 4/27 we'll still have 35.5 mil in cash without any DIP. If Delta would have paid us the 18 mil from last year and about 5 mil for the 4 months of this year, that's an additional 23 mil for a total of 58 million in cash.

I think CNBC should add this to their "American Greed" show.
If your figures are correct, then you also have to begin deducting outstanding obligations from that number.

Recall that Delta was the only lender of last resort. There was no choice. There is also the issue of Pinnacle's ratification of the agreement and the fact that the parties objecting to this arrangement having no other real plan for revenue outside of Delta. Common holders of equity get wiped out ... ask investors in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Lehman, or even Delta Air Lines prior to 2005.

If Delta's DIP motion is set aside as a result of this motion, I'd expect the result for the Company to be a dissolution.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:19 AM
  #16  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
Chapter 7 has been thrown around a lot in these threads, but you need to remember the impact of pinnacle liquidating. We operate roughly 190(not sure) planes for one carrier. Forget the fact that its our DIP provider for a second. If we liquidate, now correct me if I'm wrong, those planes stop flying immediately right? That would have a huge impact on the transportation system and I doubt any federal judge would want a part in that. Second, how much does pinnacle have in liquid assets? I would venture to guess that it wouldn't come close to covering even a fraction of the debt. I don't think one creditor will be able to sway the dip loan. Now if all the creditors teamed up I think we would have something to worry about.

Now I'm starting to see why Menke is leaving. Maybe he didn't want to be any part of this sham tactic. They wanted him to do something he didn't agree with and stood up for himself while Spanjers was in the background cutting deals with Daddy D.
I believe it's 140 CRJ200's.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:21 AM
  #17  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by filejw
If I was Delta I wouldn't either. Why would they help Pinnacle operate a/c for United ? When Pinnacle bought Colgan they took a business risk that I'm sure Delta wanted nothing to do with.
Worse, because of the way NWA had structured their risk management program, Delta's program took the losses from Colgan 3407. You can almost hear the excitement as underwriters got a much larger Delta account followed by the "oh crud" (cleaned up for APC) when they learned their account results got destroyed by what came with the acquisition.

I'm not saying this is a result of Colgan's accident, but knowing how upset the risk management side of the business were, it would not surprise me.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:50 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
Sounds like the shareholders sniffed out the shenanigans that Delta has been pulling. The only problem with stopping Delta's DIP is nobody else was willing to step up (so we have been told) If the objection is upheld, would we not likely have to move to Chaper 7 since there will be no financing to continue operations?

Exactly. Could be why Menke et al have been jumping ship. I always thought it was weird that a creditor was giving us financing in bankruptcy. Not surprised the other creditors are raising a stink about this. The court is required to give all creditors equal standing by the bankruptcy statute. I'm surprised DL and 9E management haven't done more to keep them all on board. This motion has a good chance of being approved. If it is and we have no DIP financing it could be Chapter 7 time.....
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:56 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
Chapter 7 has been thrown around a lot in these threads, but you need to remember the impact of pinnacle liquidating. We operate roughly 190(not sure) planes for one carrier. Forget the fact that its our DIP provider for a second. If we liquidate, now correct me if I'm wrong, those planes stop flying immediately right? That would have a huge impact on the transportation system and I doubt any federal judge would want a part in that. Second, how much does pinnacle have in liquid assets? I would venture to guess that it wouldn't come close to covering even a fraction of the debt. I don't think one creditor will be able to sway the dip loan. Now if all the creditors teamed up I think we would have something to worry about.

Now I'm starting to see why Menke is leaving. Maybe he didn't want to be any part of this sham tactic. They wanted him to do something he didn't agree with and stood up for himself while Spanjers was in the background cutting deals with Daddy D.
Basically it is all up to the judge. And if you look at case law for Sub Rosa bankruptcies, it doesn't look good for this plan to be approved. Without the DIP financing Pinnacle will run out of cash quick if DL doesn't pay what it owes Pinnacle for the Mesaba integration. At the beginning of April Menke said they had enough cash to keep the doors open for two weeks if DL hadn't intervened.

Doesn't matter who it affects or how bad it hurts the transportation system. If the Judge approves this motion (and there is a good chance he will) then the DIP financing goes away. If Menke was telling the truth about the company finances and the denials of DIP financing from normal lending institutions, you would be looking at a shutdown in a couple of weeks. No cash company can't operate period, no matter who it hurts.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 08:00 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Yeah, this motion will be rejected because it would cause Chapter 7. As I've said before, Delta bankrupted us by not paying us for the merger costs. This is because Colgan was integrated in, and Delta was not going to pay for any of that.

Now Delta sees an opportunity here for us and it is not related to parking 200's; The question is, what is that plan? My guess would be it has something to do with Comair.
Whether it would cause Chapter 7 or hardship has nothing to do with the Judge's ruling. Bankruptcy case law clearly stipulates that all creditors have to be treated equally. Delta is trying to improve their status as a creditor by granting the DIP loan. We'll see whose arguments win in court, but if the company and Delta cannot convince the Judge that this is not a Sub Rosa bankrupcy then the motion to deny the DIP loan will be approved, unfortunately.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OKLATEX
Cargo
3
04-03-2012 03:07 PM
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM
bluebravo
Major
29
07-27-2008 07:43 AM
mike51135
Regional
139
06-12-2008 06:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices