![]() |
Originally Posted by Kellwolf
(Post 1353578)
Commute from MEM to JFK is horrible. I think there's one non-stop from MEM-JFK now and everything else is on FedEx. There's a few flights into LGA, but last time I checked they were all MD-88s. There's more flights on bigger airplanes to DTW. Problem is either DTW, MSP or JFK, you're gonna get jammed up with all the commuters out of MEM. I'd imagine a lot will give up and move.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1353604)
That's true. But one will still have to balance the expected date of furlough with any potential move. The 850-900 are fine long term, but in the short term there's really no good solution for the rest.
|
Originally Posted by anthony210
(Post 1353691)
At this point, I doubt we are going to furlough. The company has already said no furloughs in 2013. The new CEO was in the crew room this morning and hinted that the 200s are staying much longer than anticipated along with the new 900s coming. He also said it is possible we may have to hire at some point.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1353699)
The 200s must be removed as the 900s are added.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 1353700)
But but......Lee Moak thinks that might cost ALPA jobs....
|
Originally Posted by anthony210
(Post 1353691)
At this point, I doubt we are going to furlough. The company has already said no furloughs in 2013. The new CEO was in the crew room this morning and hinted that the 200s are staying much longer than anticipated along with the new 900s coming. He also said it is possible we may have to hire at some point.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1353699)
The 200s must be removed as the 900s are added.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1353699)
The 200s must be removed as the 900s are added.
I'm just asking... |
Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
(Post 1353817)
Correction, "50 seaters" must be removed as the 900s are added.
|
Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
(Post 1353899)
Real question here. If they reconfigure the 200's to have less than 50 seats, must they be removed? Is it possible that Pinnacle could fly 200's with 49 seats and not violate the provisions of the conditions for acquiring additional 900's?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands