![]() |
Cut plan for Eagle
|
actually we all knew that except the alpa mec and cronies saying no it aint so.
all 134's will be gone by end of year. 140's up in air no pun, 145's are here for at least 8 years more. that is the current fleet plan for l-eagle subjet to change for more bad news. |
Agreed. That's the fleet plan right there. Can those junk jets last 8more years?
|
so take the 145s 8years, 140s lets just throw out there, say 3 years, and CRJs for 10 years. Now assume the 824 goes over 4 years, and do 50% of those to flow. Based on that math, what are we really looking at. Thats the future of this company. Based on all this, is this a good place to go?
|
properly eagle staffed
|
Originally Posted by rickt86
(Post 1394661)
so take the 145s 8years, 140s lets just throw out there, say 3 years, and CRJs for 10 years. Now assume the 824 goes over 4 years, and do 50% of those to flow. Based on that math, what are we really looking at. Thats the future of this company. Based on all this, is this a good place to go?
|
Originally Posted by rickt86
(Post 1394661)
so take the 145s 8years, 140s lets just throw out there, say 3 years, and CRJs for 10 years. Now assume the 824 goes over 4 years, and do 50% of those to flow. Based on that math, what are we really looking at. Thats the future of this company. Based on all this, is this a good place to go?
|
ummmmmm, NO
|
Then we as L-Eagle shouldn't be so confident that those 47 CR7's are going to stay. Everyfreakinbody operates them.
|
Originally Posted by The Chow
(Post 1394889)
Is there anything from stopping AMR from sending the CRJ's over to another carrier?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands