![]() |
Concessions - Concessions - Concessions
As I've done a bunch reading on here recently I've heard a lot about concessions to secure more flying. I know it's just more typical "You're paid to much" but it really seems odd considering the gathering clouds on finding additional pilots.
1. We have the 1500 hour / ATP rule. The regional airlines will be struggling and competing like crazy just to attract enough qualified pilots. 2. Age 65 retirements are finally starting. I've looked at the numbers some, and they're pretty gradual, but expect thousands of retirements over the next 10 years. 3. The pay (at least on the entry end) is incredibly low, and demand for regional feed from major airlines seems to be holding pretty steady. So all in all, with these items in alignment it seems odd to hear any word of concessions...even more odd that Pinnacle pilots voted in concessions to secure additional flying. When we consider that fast food workers are fighting for a minimum wage increase to $15/hr, what in the world is wrong with airline union representation to entertain or worse accept concessionary contracts when all the bargaining chips are sitting on their side of the table? I understand the RLA - but airline pilots are not federal employees working with the DOT. I'm just trying to figure out what everyone's perceptions are here in the regional forum...I think you guys are in a heck of a position right now, considerably better postured than a few years earlier...just need to get the representation onboard! Opinions? |
Originally Posted by flynavyj
(Post 1460760)
As I've done a bunch reading on here recently I've heard a lot about concessions to secure more flying. I know it's just more typical "You're paid to much" but it really seems odd considering the gathering clouds on finding additional pilots.
1. We have the 1500 hour / ATP rule. The regional airlines will be struggling and competing like crazy just to attract enough qualified pilots. 2. Age 65 retirements are finally starting. I've looked at the numbers some, and they're pretty gradual, but expect thousands of retirements over the next 10 years. 3. The pay (at least on the entry end) is incredibly low, and demand for regional feed from major airlines seems to be holding pretty steady. So all in all, with these items in alignment it seems odd to hear any word of concessions...even more odd that Pinnacle pilots voted in concessions to secure additional flying. When we consider that fast food workers are fighting for a minimum wage increase to $15/hr, what in the world is wrong with airline union representation to entertain or worse accept concessionary contracts when all the bargaining chips are sitting on their side of the table? I understand the RLA - but airline pilots are not federal employees working with the DOT. I'm just trying to figure out what everyone's perceptions are here in the regional forum...I think you guys are in a heck of a position right now, considerably better postured than a few years earlier...just need to get the representation onboard! Opinions? Age 65 but it still will be a little bit before we really start feeling the effects of that. Regional feed is probably shrinking due to the removal of 50 seat flying. Instead of 3 or 4 trips in a CRJ-200/ERJ145, it is now probably 1 or 2 in a E175/CRJ900. This means that the regionals are shrinking. What I am getting at is NOT "RJ Pilot" doom and gloom (if you know the tool, you know who I am talking about) - but we are seeing both positive and negative signs of movement resulting in stagnation or even reversal. What I see possible is that the management folks see this and are (hopefully) scared. They want to secure as many concessions and leverage as possible before they lose the advantage they have had. Or I could have absolutely NO idea what I am talking about and should just go back to flying the plane... which is quite possible :) |
Originally Posted by flynavyj
(Post 1460760)
...even more odd that Pinnacle pilots voted in concessions to secure additional flying...
|
Originally Posted by flynavyj
(Post 1460760)
As I've done a bunch reading on here recently I've heard a lot about concessions to secure more flying. I know it's just more typical "You're paid to much" but it really seems odd considering the gathering clouds on finding additional pilots.
1. We have the 1500 hour / ATP rule. The regional airlines will be struggling and competing like crazy just to attract enough qualified pilots. 2. Age 65 retirements are finally starting. I've looked at the numbers some, and they're pretty gradual, but expect thousands of retirements over the next 10 years. 3. The pay (at least on the entry end) is incredibly low, and demand for regional feed from major airlines seems to be holding pretty steady. So all in all, with these items in alignment it seems odd to hear any word of concessions...even more odd that Pinnacle pilots voted in concessions to secure additional flying. When we consider that fast food workers are fighting for a minimum wage increase to $15/hr, what in the world is wrong with airline union representation to entertain or worse accept concessionary contracts when all the bargaining chips are sitting on their side of the table? I understand the RLA - but airline pilots are not federal employees working with the DOT. I'm just trying to figure out what everyone's perceptions are here in the regional forum...I think you guys are in a heck of a position right now, considerably better postured than a few years earlier...just need to get the representation onboard! Opinions? The pay, working conditions, QOL, and union on property seemed to be much better. |
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
(Post 1460777)
No they are not.
The pay, working conditions, QOL, and union on property seemed to be much better. LoL...Yes, i'd agree. Normally "illegal work actions" are brought up, and the reference made is the controller strike in the early 1980's, but sadly that doesn't really seem to be a valid point. Least not in my half-shut eyes. |
Any news on the rest of the RJ's at Eagle? Word is AMR failed to pay for leases, and now banks are looking to repossess.
Stay tuned. |
Originally Posted by flynavyj
(Post 1460760)
...even more odd that Pinnacle pilots voted in concessions to secure additional flying.
There's no shortage of pilots at any level. If there were the market would adjust and pay more. Let's not pretend unions have any leverage. |
Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
(Post 1460790)
Any news on the rest of the RJ's at Eagle? Word is AMR failed to pay for leases, and now banks are looking to repossess.
Stay tuned. |
Originally Posted by Noseeums
(Post 1460922)
Pinnacle is shrinking from 197 to 81 aircraft.
There's no shortage of pilots at any level. If there were the market would adjust and pay more. Let's not pretend unions have any leverage. Give it another 18-24 months. |
Originally Posted by flynavyj
(Post 1460760)
As I've done a bunch reading on here recently I've heard a lot about concessions to secure more flying. I know it's just more typical "You're paid to much" but it really seems odd considering the gathering clouds on finding additional pilots.
1. We have the 1500 hour / ATP rule. The regional airlines will be struggling and competing like crazy just to attract enough qualified pilots. 2. Age 65 retirements are finally starting. I've looked at the numbers some, and they're pretty gradual, but expect thousands of retirements over the next 10 years. 3. The pay (at least on the entry end) is incredibly low, and demand for regional feed from major airlines seems to be holding pretty steady. So all in all, with these items in alignment it seems odd to hear any word of concessions...even more odd that Pinnacle pilots voted in concessions to secure additional flying. When we consider that fast food workers are fighting for a minimum wage increase to $15/hr, what in the world is wrong with airline union representation to entertain or worse accept concessionary contracts when all the bargaining chips are sitting on their side of the table? I understand the RLA - but airline pilots are not federal employees working with the DOT. I'm just trying to figure out what everyone's perceptions are here in the regional forum...I think you guys are in a heck of a position right now, considerably better postured than a few years earlier...just need to get the representation onboard! Opinions? If fast food workers had the equivalent of the ERJ 170 series (ie: a grill top or deep fryer with jet engines underneath it's wings) they would be asking for concessions in order to cook on such an awesome piece of restaurant equipment. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands