No Voters
09-28-2013 | 07:22 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
No Voters
Lots of talk about jumpseat wars and that psa pilots are scabs etc. It should be noted that 244 pilots out of approximately 530 voted in favor of this ta.. Thats less than half of us. You guys need to realize that every psa guy/gal you see, 50/50 chance they voted NO, or didnt get to vote at all.
09-28-2013 | 07:27 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 161
Likes: 1
Or didn't bother to vote at all.
09-28-2013 | 08:00 PM
#7
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Shiny & Cushy
Lots of talk about jumpseat wars and that psa pilots are scabs etc. It should be noted that 244 pilots out of approximately 530 voted in favor of this ta.. Thats less than half of us. You guys need to realize that every psa guy/gal you see, 50/50 chance they voted NO, or didnt get to vote at all.
09-28-2013 | 08:02 PM
#8
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: 737
Let's get a list going. Employee #, seniority #, base, etc, to help identify those who chose to stand strong for our profession against management's perpetual war on our livelihood. The rest of the list, well, nothing further needs to be said.
Funny how everyone's a 'NO' voter after a crap TA passes. Time to put money where your mouth is.
Funny how everyone's a 'NO' voter after a crap TA passes. Time to put money where your mouth is.
09-28-2013 | 09:59 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Hot tub for now
Y? Because everyone is scared that the future of 50 seaters is bleak.
They voted because less pay is better than no pay.
Personally I'd rather say up yours. But people voted yes because they were afraid of the unknown consequences. I'd rather take the risk. They wouldn't.
I'd lose $500,000 in my career. The seniors would lose 1% for 5 years. That's all. I don't blame them for voting yes. I blame the f/o's who think this will get them the left seat faster. Very shirt sighted
They voted because less pay is better than no pay.
Personally I'd rather say up yours. But people voted yes because they were afraid of the unknown consequences. I'd rather take the risk. They wouldn't.
I'd lose $500,000 in my career. The seniors would lose 1% for 5 years. That's all. I don't blame them for voting yes. I blame the f/o's who think this will get them the left seat faster. Very shirt sighted
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
