Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Alpa refutes myth of u.s. Pilot shortage >

Alpa refutes myth of u.s. Pilot shortage

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Alpa refutes myth of u.s. Pilot shortage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2014 | 05:47 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by pitch mode
Hmmmm, US regional: $17k a year and 40 year old wife or Chinese airline $17K a month and 25 year old Asian girlfriend.
Where can you get a $17k/mo job at a chinese airline with 1500 piston hours?
Reply
Old 02-07-2014 | 05:56 AM
  #22  
pitch mode's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Default

My point: Unlike plumbers, auto mechanics, lawyers, doctors, chefs, engineers, professional athletes, et. al., who can move laterally to another entity. The pilot may have to start all over again. I have 3 buddies who have done exactly this (fly in China)after getting laid off.
Reply
Old 02-07-2014 | 06:16 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
From: Representing the REAL Delta
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
The more appropriate statement is "If the majority of PSA pilots voted NO, PSA pilots would've never taken those concessions." ALPA National is not allowed to dictate what pilot groups do. They can only provide guidance, legal advice, financial analysis, etc.

If an airline is BK(this is not about PSA but rather a hypothetical situation), and it comes to it's pilot group for concessions, would it be ok for ALPA National to tell management to go pound sand simply because ALPA is a "real union"? Putting pilots there out of jobs? The decision is up to the pilot group. Not ALPA National.
This is correct......

If your local wants to sell you down river, they can......and you as the pilot group can vote for or against it. If your going to spew venom, at least take the time to research the information.
Reply
Old 02-07-2014 | 07:22 AM
  #24  
jethikoki's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
Where can you get a $17k/mo job at a chinese airline with 1500 piston hours?
Just change your piston time to turbine or what ever you like. The Chinese don't seem to care or have the same checks and balances like the US does.
Reply
Old 02-07-2014 | 07:44 AM
  #25  
jethikoki's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Past V1
Some 1,154 ALPA members currently are furloughed from their airlines.
Comair Airlines closed in 2012, furloughing more than 850 highly trained and experienced pilots, nearly all of whom are looking for jobs.
Is it just me or has anyone thought why those 850 highly trained pilots are still needing to look for jobs? Being a member of ALPA and bought out by DAL why is there a double standard. How many NWA or Western Airline pilots needed to look for work after DAL took over? I know I know, someone will say the usual argument but "Comair was not a major, it wasn't a merger, they didn't have similar gage equipment....bla bla bla."
I still say this IS the biggest failure of ALPA and the industry as a whole.
Its ok though, there just regional pilots. Heell us mainline guys support all those regionals anyway and there is now way they could be equal to us real professionals. Our equipment is sooo much bigger. Right?
Reply
Old 02-07-2014 | 07:45 AM
  #26  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by jethikoki
Just change your piston time to turbine or what ever you like. The Chinese don't seem to care or have the same checks and balances like the US does.

Hmmm. Be careful. They're still a totalitarian state and have some draconian penalties if they do decide to care care. Pilots are not accredited diplomats, you'd be fully subject to their justice system if they wanted to go there.
Reply
Old 02-07-2014 | 07:45 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Default

I know that I will probably take some heat on this one but here goes. ALPA has been lobbying hard to keep foreign airlines out of the US but just admitted that foreign airlines pay and benefits are superior to most US carriers. So why not let them come in and compete directly with our legacy carriers that have cornered the market? The only thing I can think of is that many foreign carriers are not ALPA. So is ALPA looking out for itself or the best interest of pilots?
Reply
Old 02-07-2014 | 08:18 AM
  #28  
jethikoki's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by madeinUSA
I know that I will probably take some heat on this one but here goes. ALPA has been lobbying hard to keep foreign airlines out of the US but just admitted that foreign airlines pay and benefits are superior to most US carriers. So why not let them come in and compete directly with our legacy carriers that have cornered the market? The only thing I can think of is that many foreign carriers are not ALPA. So is ALPA looking out for itself or the best interest of pilots?
Cabotage in a word. ALPA wants to protect US pilots jobs because the more foreign carriers allowed in and compete would take away US jobs. Not all foreign carries pay a higher wage. Its only allowed if its done by internal US carriers like mainline pilots wanting the flying back "no matter" how its done as long as they get the flying back.
Reply
Old 02-07-2014 | 08:43 AM
  #29  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

ALPA is afraid of losing its closed union shop status, it doesn't care about the jobs part. Most of those foreign carrier jobs are better paying than US carriers.
Reply
Old 02-07-2014 | 08:48 AM
  #30  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by jethikoki
Cabotage in a word. ALPA wants to protect US pilots jobs because the more foreign carriers allowed in and compete would take away US jobs. Not all foreign carries pay a higher wage. Its only allowed if its done by internal US carriers like mainline pilots wanting the flying back "no matter" how its done as long as they get the flying back.

There truly is a shortage of pilots outside the US and Europe. The US pilot pool is the primary means of alleviating that shortage right now. It would be hard in the current environment to bring in outside pilots at less cost than what US airlines already enjoy.

Cabin crews and maintenance on the other hand might be far cheaper if based offshore, so that might make economic sense of cabotage even if the pilots cost more.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
maximilian2
Foreign
26
06-12-2015 04:31 AM
lakehouse
Hiring News
32
08-24-2010 10:38 AM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices