Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Silver Airways LOA (2014) (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/80036-silver-airways-loa-2014-a.html)

ctab5060X 03-04-2014 03:44 PM


Originally Posted by CaptainCarl (Post 1595007)

BF (our Chief Negotiator) was correct in saying that there's some good money to be made by reserve pilots.

How exactly is there good money to be made by reserve pilots as compared to now?

Loss of 150% above 70.5 hours wasn't addressed...
Loss of the 3 hours of credit for each reserve day wasn't addressed...

and, straight from the Addendum...

"The Company acknowledges that reserve pilots are not eligible to initiate
open time transactions, including the pick-up of open time. However, the
Company may offer open time trips to a reserve pilot who has made
himself or herself available on days off."

So, without the loss of the first two items, a reserve now has to work harder each month to break guarantee, and to make any real money, you have to make yourself available on your days off because you can't initiate an open-time transaction. Then you only get LDO pay "IF" they offer you any open flying.

Sorry, but I'm just not seeing how a reserve can make "good money" under the LOA and subsequent Addendum.

Salukipilot4590 03-04-2014 03:45 PM

It's not proprunner;

4 on 3 off is the only way to have a family life if you commute. 2 off is terrible.

Notice that the addendum didn't fix the loss of 70.5, 3/day for reserves, and the personal day stuff.

Also we don't have a competitive payscale.

Still Concessionary

No.

End

proprunnner 03-04-2014 05:02 PM

At least it was a somewhat decent contract before. But with this new LOA and lower than standard pay scale, which says a lot, I don't understand how they think this will attract and retain pilots.

flightmedic01 03-04-2014 05:32 PM

Silver Airways LOA (2014)
 
Nononononononononono!!!!!

Gangsta 03-05-2014 03:29 AM


Originally Posted by CaptainCarl (Post 1594977)
After re-reading the LOA and the Addendum, I can't find very many reasons not to vote in favor of this LOA. However, that being said, this vote is a personal choice for each of us and everyone should vote according to how it affects them personally. If it benefits you, vote yes. If not, vote no.

However, that said, I'm always open to more discussion and I won't cast my vote until March 14th.

You have not been on reserve long enough! There's not enough alcohol in the world to keep me sedated on reserve if this passes.

Salukipilot4590 03-05-2014 07:23 AM

Voted no, done

flightmedic01 03-05-2014 08:20 AM


Originally Posted by Gangsta (Post 1595477)
You have not been on reserve long enough! There's not enough alcohol in the world to keep me sedated on reserve if this passes.

Very true! I've seen you drink!!:D

dmncnpilot 03-05-2014 06:14 PM

I voted the opposite of yes :D

ctab5060X 03-05-2014 08:22 PM

Finally done!

proprunnner 03-07-2014 08:39 PM

Can anyone confirm that first year pay will increase to $27.15 in May still, and will this mean each subsequent level pay will increase accordingly?

Bassman1985 03-07-2014 08:47 PM


Originally Posted by proprunnner (Post 1597827)
Can anyone confirm that first year pay will increase to $27.15 in May still, and will this mean each subsequent level pay will increase accordingly?

According to the LOA, if ratified, FO payscale will increase 10% across the board. Only if it passes, of course.

But like every contract, it must be taken as a whole. The loss of overtime for reserves coupled with the 18 straight days away from home for commuters, make it a net loss of take-home pay for new hires due to lower credit hour potential on reserve. I voted no.

proprunnner 03-07-2014 09:04 PM

but prior to the LAO, wasn't there already contractual increases to compensate for inflation?.....or did I just made up that whole thing in my head?

Bassman1985 03-08-2014 06:23 AM


Originally Posted by proprunnner (Post 1597840)
but prior to the LAO, wasn't there already contractual increases to compensate for inflation?.....or did I just made up that whole thing in my head?

Yes there are, DOS+3 scale will go into effect this May regardless of LOA status. Goes up to DOS+5. Starting FO pay on the Saab as of May 6 will be $25.29 without the LOA.

ctab5060X 03-08-2014 06:44 AM


Originally Posted by Bassman1985 (Post 1597834)
According to the LOA, if ratified, FO payscale will increase 10% across the board. Only if it passes, of course.

But like every contract, it must be taken as a whole. The loss of overtime for reserves coupled with the 18 straight days away from home for commuters, make it a net loss of take-home pay for new hires due to lower credit hour potential on reserve. I voted no.

From what I could tell, it seems that more money was given to the company via concessions than was given to the pilot group via raises. If the cost of this LOA is positive, it sure isn't statistically significant enough to even consider voting yes.


I see tho LOA as a "we need pay raises for the pilot group" but since there is no money for raises, we'll give up X, Y, and Z to be able to show we got "pay raises".


This LOA definitely falls under the "pulling the wool over the sheep's eyes" category.

Salukipilot4590 03-08-2014 07:19 AM

I wonder what the preliminary numbers are haha

ctab5060X 03-08-2014 11:24 AM


Originally Posted by Salukipilot4590 (Post 1598059)
I wonder what the preliminary numbers are haha

Why don't we get Wolf Blitzer over on CNN to do an update?


With 1% of the precincts reporting, we can call this in favor of...

CaptainCarl 03-10-2014 08:51 AM

Voted.



Also, grievances should come first.

Salukipilot4590 03-10-2014 12:51 PM

More than 50% voted so far, get out there and vote!!!

ctab5060X 03-10-2014 04:13 PM


Originally Posted by Salukipilot4590 (Post 1599476)
More than 50% voted so far, get out there and vote!!!

...and do you fellow pilots a favor and vote NO!

PICsf340 03-10-2014 05:52 PM

Guys, looking to commute on silver from tlh to mco on a regular basis. Are thos flights typically full? Good luck with your voting. Hope it works out well

Salukipilot4590 03-10-2014 05:57 PM

Yes yes they are

CaptainCarl 03-14-2014 01:20 PM

Official results:

Yes - 23 - 15.75%
No - 123 - 84.25%

146 votes out of 178 eligible voters - 82.02% participation.

APC poll results, for comparison:

Yes - 10 - 24.39%
No - 30 - 73.17%
Unsure - 1 - 2.44%

Salukipilot4590 03-14-2014 01:42 PM

http://i.imgur.com/TiGaidR.gif

CloudPilot57 03-14-2014 01:44 PM

So now what happens?

ctab5060X 03-14-2014 01:50 PM


Originally Posted by CloudPilot57 (Post 1602279)
So now what happens?

I asked that weeks ago on the union board and NEVER got an answer. So good luck finding out!

With that kind of overwhelming statement of NO, there at least need to be a complete overhaul of the Negotiatiing Committee.

CaptainCarl 03-14-2014 01:55 PM


Originally Posted by CloudPilot57 (Post 1602279)
So now what happens?


Originally Posted by ctab5060X (Post 1602281)
I asked that weeks ago on the union board and NEVER got an answer. So good luck finding out!

Nothing. Everything remains status quo.


Originally Posted by ctab5060X (Post 1602281)
With that kind of overwhelming statement of NO, there at least need to be a complete overhaul of the Negotiatiing Committee.

Are you volunteering? I'm sure our Chief Negotiator would be glad to have your "expertise" during the next round of negotiations. Remember, he's the same guy that was involved in the drafting of the 2011 CBA, the one in which we currently work under. Don't underestimate his ability as a negotiator.

There are two sides of the table, remember that.

ZBowFlyz 03-14-2014 02:25 PM


Originally Posted by CaptainCarl (Post 1602284)
Nothing. Everything remains status quo.



Are you volunteering? I'm sure our Chief Negotiator would be glad to have your "expertise" during the next round of negotiations. Remember, he's the same guy that was involved in the drafting of the 2011 CBA, the one in which we currently work under. Don't underestimate his ability as a negotiator.

There are two sides of the table, remember that.

never mind.........

ctab5060X 03-14-2014 04:20 PM


Originally Posted by CaptainCarl (Post 1602284)
Nothing. Everything remains status quo.



Are you volunteering? I'm sure our Chief Negotiator would be glad to have your "expertise" during the next round of negotiations. Remember, he's the same guy that was involved in the drafting of the 2011 CBA, the one in which we currently work under. Don't underestimate his ability as a negotiator.

There are two sides of the table, remember that.

So... is it status quo or are we going back to the table?


Serious question, why is every union response always "are you volunteering?" I would say yes, but I doubt that a new agreement can be hammered out in less than a week.

Only reason I said changes need to be made are the pilot group just overwhelmingly voted NO on the LOA. Honestly, the ExCo should not be part of the Negotiating Committee. NC should report to the ExCo, but there needs to be some fresh blood sitting down at the table if there is a next time around.

CaptainCarl 03-14-2014 06:48 PM


Originally Posted by ctab5060X (Post 1602376)
So... is it status quo or are we going back to the table?

Serious question, why is every union response always "are you volunteering?" I would say yes, but I doubt that a new agreement can be hammered out in less than a week.

Only reason I said changes need to be made are the pilot group just overwhelmingly voted NO on the LOA. Honestly, the ExCo should not be part of the Negotiating Committee. NC should report to the ExCo, but there needs to be some fresh blood sitting down at the table if there is a next time around.

As far as I know, status quo.

We ask that question because some pilots like to gripe but when it comes to doing work, they'd rather sit back and let someone else do it. There's very little benefit in it for me, but I do it anyway to improve the lives of those around me. Same goes for our ExCo, Negotiating Committee, Stewards, and Committee members. You do a LOT of griping ctab, but I don't see you doing much work on behalf of your fellow crew members (honestly that could be because I don't have the faintest idea who you are, so correct me if I'm wrong).

I agree, maybe the NC could use some fresh blood, but I wouldn't replace the Chief Negotiator. He's an asset. The no vote is a good thing, especially how overwhelming it was. It shows that we are standing together, not ready to accept anything less than what we're worth. For now, we maintain what we've got and make progress when we can.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands