![]() |
Forget about Capt/FO pay. Explain why any FA should be paid more then any pilots. No FO at regionals should be getting less pay then the highest paid FA at a mainline.
|
Hmmm. Worked for me in pre-post test and worked just now. Might be an android thing. Just search Youtube for "child tantrum" and take your pick.
|
Originally Posted by jethikoki
(Post 1715769)
Forget about Capt/FO pay. Explain why any FA should be paid more then any pilots. No FO at regionals should be getting less pay then the highest paid FA at a mainline.
|
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 1715538)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anderson There's just so much wrong with this kind of thinking. Captains and FOs have the same training. They have the same type ratings. They have the same ATP certificates. The physical safety of both is equally at risk. Both have an equal responsibility for the safety of the passengers (FOs can kill everyone on board just the same as a captain can). Captains put their good name and record on the line much more than FOs? How is that?? FOs put their records and certificates on the line just the same. So often both the captain AND the FO get fired and/or violated for incidents and accidents. I realized a long time ago that captains do not earn their seats, as you suggest. If that was true, then how do you explain some regional captains upgrading in 18 months while others don't make it to the left seat for 8 years? Did the 8 year FO perform so poorly that it took him nearly 5 times longer to earn what the other guy did? It's simply a matter of luck and timing when someone is able to upgrade. The pay scale disparity is completely asinine. You mentioned capitalism as if it's a factor; free market capitalism is no where to be found in unionized airline pilot pay scales. Companies hand over a certain amount of money to the whole pilot group, and unions divide up the money in a very artificial, anti free-market type of system. There is no hope for you....you can't fix stupid. Seems like you can't argue against my rational points, so you're only response is to call it stupid. |
Originally Posted by Anderson
(Post 1715812)
Are you saying that pilot wages ARE determined by the free market? That upgrades ARE merit based? That FOs DON'T have an ATP and type rating just like a captain?
Seems like you can't argue against my rational points, so you're only response is to call it stupid. |
Originally Posted by Anderson
(Post 1715812)
Are you saying that pilot wages ARE determined by the free market? That upgrades ARE merit based? That FOs DON'T have an ATP and type rating just like a captain?
Seems like you can't argue against my rational points, so you're only response is to call it stupid. |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 1715844)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anderson Are you saying that pilot wages ARE determined by the free market? That upgrades ARE merit based? That FOs DON'T have an ATP and type rating just like a captain? Seems like you can't argue against my rational points, so you're only response is to call it stupid. My point still stands....and you continue to prove it. You are trying to argue that the CA and fo share the same responsibility.....that is absurd. If people became captains based on merit, there could be an argument for the huge pay gap. But since it's usually based on when you get hired, I don't think there's a justification. |
Originally Posted by Hetman
(Post 1715760)
|
Originally Posted by Paid2fly
(Post 1715716)
Too bad Eastern Airlines isn't still around, you and Anderson could be first in line to cross...
|
Originally Posted by AlaskaBound
(Post 1712630)
Says the greedy old geezer who should have retired years ago but didn't because he was entitled to work longer and make more money and stagnate the industry. Get over yourself old man. I hope you're long gone before I get to the majors. I couldn't stand flying with your type. If I had a dollar every time an old person said "that d*** entitled generation"...it's getting really old, and every generation says the generation before them was entitled, and you sound ignorant.
To the OP, I think there should be a flattened out version. Not necessarily paid the same amount but bring up the pay for the FO. Captains do have more responsibly and are the boss...they should get paid more. Even better would be if captain pay stayed the same and our greedy mainline partners paid more to increase FO pay to narrow the gap. |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 1715974)
....And ALPA would be the first to welcome him to the airline, as long as he pays his dues.
Very sad isn't it... |
Originally Posted by Chupacabras
(Post 1716844)
Remember what makes you a captain, its not your skill, its when you got hired ONLY. Both pilots in the cockpit do basically the same job, and violations and certificate actions come in pairs, not just to the captain. There should be a flatter version so that this industry can hire otherwise you entitled captains might find yourselves in downgrade class earning pennies. Then, you would have a different perspective about the pay scale.
Even better would be if captain pay stayed the same and our greedy mainline partners paid more to increase FO pay to narrow the gap. You do realize that pretty much every captain started out as a first officer right? How is our "perspective" lacking?? |
Originally Posted by Paid2fly
(Post 1716866)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chupacabras Remember what makes you a captain, its not your skill, its when you got hired ONLY. Both pilots in the cockpit do basically the same job, and violations and certificate actions come in pairs, not just to the captain. There should be a flatter version so that this industry can hire otherwise you entitled captains might find yourselves in downgrade class earning pennies. Then, you would have a different perspective about the pay scale. Even better would be if captain pay stayed the same and our greedy mainline partners paid more to increase FO pay to narrow the gap. You do realize that pretty much every captain started out as a first officer right? How is our "perspective" lacking?? |
Originally Posted by Anderson
(Post 1716873)
Because a lot of regional captains upgraded in 18 months to two years, while some were even hired as street captains. That's why you lack perspective.
I knew that would be the entitled groups argument... Had to work many crappy jobs and fly thousands and thousands of hours before they would even consider us back then. Flew air ambulance, night freight(loading and unloading required), charter, etc. Did that for a lot longer than 18 months to 2 years. Nobody was doing street captains then, and wouldn't have wanted a job at a place so crappy that they'd need them either! How's that for "perspective"? |
None of what you said is relevant to the facts that:
A) It is unfair they do not have what they want when they want it, and B) It is unfair the world does not orbit around them as it used to when their parents were failing so utterly to raise them. Do not attempt to apply reason; it has no place in this discussion. |
Well why are regional CAs entitled to such high wages? The only reason you are a regional CA for more than 5 years is that you are a failure - a lifer plain and simple.
It's not about FOs being entitled to better money, it's the amount of idiots at the top who can't hack it so they stay safe in their tiny RJ cockpit getting fluff checkrides from their buddies. Keep the pay scales the same, just force out loser lifers. For every CA that has a low time pilot he or she was baby sitting, I have a CA that would have gotten us violated. But the guys here don't seem to realize violations come in pairs or that at an airline, the only difference between a CA and an experienced FO is their spot on the list. Just ask all those entitled Pinnacle FOs (displaced CAs) slinging gear for junior Colgan CAs... Yes, it's all the FOs fault, they are entitled brats from the Me generation. |
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1716963)
Well why are regional CAs entitled to such high wages? The only reason you are a regional CA for more than 5 years is that you are a failure - a lifer plain and simple.
It's not about FOs being entitled to better money, it's the amount of idiots at the top who can't hack it so they stay safe in their tiny RJ cockpit getting fluff checkrides from their buddies. Keep the pay scales the same, just force out loser lifers. For every CA that has a low time pilot he or she was baby sitting, I have a CA that would have gotten us violated. But the guys here don't seem to realize violations come in pairs or that at an airline, the only difference between a CA and an experienced FO is their spot on the list. Just ask all those entitled Pinnacle FOs (displaced CAs) slinging gear for junior Colgan CAs... Yes, it's all the FOs fault, they are entitled brats from the Me generation. |
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1716963)
Well why are regional CAs entitled to such high wages?
|
If you don't like the pay why do you show up for the job? Look in the mirror, you're the one responsible for the pay. No one forced you to work for the rate you signed up for.
Why does the job pay $22 an hour to start. Because there are plenty of pilots willing to accept it. -- including you. RJ captain should pay $100 an hour minimum. After all that's only second year FO pay at most legacies. Why does it pay less. Because 99% of the regional pilots have agreed to less. |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1716974)
There can only be one factual answer to that question regardless of which side of the argument you fall on. It's because a small, select group of pilots decided that was the way it was going to be.
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1716963)
Yes, it's all the FOs fault, they are entitled brats from the Me generation.
|
Yes, "regional" airline FOs should be paid more, and yes, "regional" airline captains should be paid well. No need to take from the captains just to give the FOs a decent wage.
I agree with tom11011 about starting wages: if starting wages weren't so abysmal, it wouldn't be so prohibitive to leave a crappy company and start over somewhere else. It would give pilots more leverage, and we wouldn't have to play their fear games of "we'll shut you down and you'll have to start over somewhere else for $21,000" every single time they try to squeeze more concessions out of us. |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1712291)
Read before voting. Identities are hidden in the poll.
Everyone tends to agree that regional airline FO's should be paid more money at regional airlines, even airline management. But how far would the regional pilot group as a whole be willing to go? I suppose the answer to this question might have something to do with whether you believe a regional airline is a place you can make a career at or whether you believe its 'up and out' only. Even if your regional airline had the best intentions towards its pilots, they don't get to set the ticket prices. They are constrained by the pot of money given to them by their parent airline. And your airline management doesn't even decide how the money is divided up, the pilots do. Get a bigger pot of money you say from the parent airline? Be careful because if you ask for too much, other regional airlines will fly right in under the radar and underbid you because they can afford to do so with newly found pilot concession money. Some call this type of pilot affliction SJS. So could you support a flattened pay scale where Captains and FO's make the same amount of money? Where only years of service pays higher? Where size of equipment doesn't matter and is determined by mainline pilot scope provisions? Potentially, it could look like this- a pay scale that starts at $40,000/yr and tops out in year 10 at $80,000/yr, regardless of seat. That's a $4000 per year raise. What are some of the benefits you ask? What if you have to start over at a new regional airline because you want to move, or you hate the company, or the company goes out of business, etc... think about how much easier it would be to do just that. Right now, you are screwed, it's HARD to leave after the first year. And think about this, the company is now more on the hook to make the place better otherwise they will have to deal with FO attrition and all the training costs of that attrition when pilots decide airline B is slightly better. All of the sudden they have a vested interest in keeping pilots happy if they know pilots have other better options and do not have to take such a massive pay hit to keep them from leaving. Pilots become less of a slave to the company. The poll question is "Should Regional Airlines Flatten Pay Scales". Several of the Comair guys that were 20+ year guys there mentioned that if they had to do over again, they would have fought to increase pay at the fo level there, but also urge alpa national to create one for for all regionals. The obvious reason is they are starting over at extremely low wages. 5-10 years ago this wasn't even a thought for them. How many of us are at a place we think is fine, but next year we are in their shoes? Another problem is not just pay, but qol items to. If one company has guarantee of 12 days off a month and another company has 10 days off the company providing 12 off a month has a higher cost due to more staffing needs. Contract language has a very high importance just like pay. It would be good if we could get to a world of decent pay for first year guys, but defining good pay is different for everyone. One thing is certain - it's not right anyone starts at current pay at regionals. This shouldn't matter if you are new out of flight school or a Chuck Yeager. We all deserve a professional wage. |
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1716963)
Well why are regional CAs entitled to such high wages? The only reason you are a regional CA for more than 5 years is that you are a failure - a lifer plain and simple.
It's not about FOs being entitled to better money, it's the amount of idiots at the top who can't hack it so they stay safe in their tiny RJ cockpit getting fluff checkrides from their buddies. Keep the pay scales the same, just force out loser lifers. For every CA that has a low time pilot he or she was baby sitting, I have a CA that would have gotten us violated. But the guys here don't seem to realize violations come in pairs or that at an airline, the only difference between a CA and an experienced FO is their spot on the list. Just ask all those entitled Pinnacle FOs (displaced CAs) slinging gear for junior Colgan CAs... Yes, it's all the FOs fault, they are entitled brats from the Me generation. |
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1717323)
You must be a liberal/socialists since you are so in favor of an Obama style spreading out the wealth. :cool:
|
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1716963)
Well why are regional CAs entitled to such high wages? The only reason you are a regional CA for more than 5 years is that you are a failure - a lifer plain and simple.
|
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1715437)
cut.
Regional CAs should be punished for not moving on.
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1715607)
Yup, 7+ year FOs don't get it. Your spoon is more silver than ERAU grads. I'm sure you can look Mesaba guys in the face who had flow and not project superiority.
Many friends are career FOs thus far that had NWA jobs until XJ ALPA rolled over for the 108.
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1716963)
Well why are regional CAs entitled to such high wages? The only reason you are a regional CA for more than 5 years is that you are a failure - a lifer plain and simple.
Yes, it's all the FOs fault, they are entitled brats from the Me generation. |
Originally Posted by mooney
(Post 1717363)
Really? It has nothing to do with 9/11, the economy tanking in 08, age 65 etc? I'd be more than happy to put my record up against yours any day (just kidding….I obviously have 3+ pink slips, no degree and multiple DUI's). So why are you still in the right seat of a regional 6 or 7 years? Must be a loser or Blue, Virgin etc would have hired you :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1717391)
If only you knew how ironic this post is....
|
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1717323)
Why did you accept the job if you are so unhappy with the salary that goes along with it? Do you have nothing else going on for yourself? As long as chumps like you show up for the jobs then the low pay will continue. You are not the solution, you're the problem. You must be a liberal/socialists since you are so in favor of an Obama style spreading out the wealth. :cool:
Originally Posted by Hetman
(Post 1717086)
Not true. While a small group may be responsible for negotiating pay scales, each pilot, regardless of seat, carries equal weight when the whole group votes to ratify or decline them.
Not all of them. You seem to fit that mold, however. It is (sadly) ironic that your attempt at sarcasm, at least in your case, hit so close to objective truth.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1716968)
You sound like gods gift to avaition!
Originally Posted by Utah
(Post 1717028)
If you don't like the pay why do you show up for the job? Look in the mirror, you're the one responsible for the pay. No one forced you to work for the rate you signed up for.
Why does the job pay $22 an hour to start. Because there are plenty of pilots willing to accept it. -- including you. RJ captain should pay $100 an hour minimum. After all that's only second year FO pay at most legacies. Why does it pay less. Because 99% of the regional pilots have agreed to less. |
Simples, cencal, don't show up for your next trip, submit a resignation. I don't think you're a socialist, just not a realist. The Company and ALPA realized they could get F/Os to fly for a deep discount compared to the majors, you and thousands of others said, "ok, for a chance at T7 major captain, I accept these wages". Stop accepting, game over.
GF |
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1717323)
Why did you accept the job if you are so unhappy with the salary that goes along with it? Do you have nothing else going on for yourself? As long as chumps like you show up for the jobs then the low pay will continue. You are not the solution, you're the problem. You must be a liberal/socialists since you are so in favor of an Obama style spreading out the wealth. :cool:
|
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1716963)
The only reason you are a regional CA for more than 5 years is that you are a failure - a lifer plain and simple.
Maybe I should start sending some apps out. Take my 12000 hours, 8000 hours of PIC turbine, 3 degrees with a 3.8gpa, no negatives on my record, and my military experience and start competing against you for a job. You wouldn't mind me competing against you for a job would you? Your 4500 hours and 0 pic time? (and why haven't you been hired elsewhere, we've had plenty of pilots leave without PIC time?) Maybe you ought to be thankful there are a bunch lifers (perhaps thousands of them) that aren't applying for the jobs you want. |
Originally Posted by Utah
(Post 1717552)
Dang man, you make me feel so depressed. Hopefully that $4-5000check I get every two weeks or so cheers me up. It sucks being a loser, sleeping in my own bed everyday, weekends and holidays off, spending time with the family...
Maybe I should start sending some apps out. Take my 12000 hours, 8000 hours of PIC turbine, 3 degrees with a 3.8gpa, no negatives on my record, and my military experience and start competing against you for a job. You wouldn't mind me competing against you for a job would you? Your 4500 hours and 0 pic time? (and why haven't you been hired elsewhere, we've had plenty of pilots leave without PIC time?) Maybe you ought to be thankful there are a bunch lifers (perhaps thousands of them) that aren't applying for the jobs you want. |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 1717531)
You know, there were a lot of guys who had their NWA interviews canceled due to the flow at XJ, you know, so they could hand you your job communist style.
|
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1717478)
Having a job at NWA/DAL because you worked at XJ is the very definition of entitlement.
|
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1717625)
Your perception couldn't be more skewed cencal. I don't know of a single pilot from XJ who got hired/flowed at NWA/DAL who felt entitled to the job. All the flows spend 14+ years at XJ and were perfectly content not going anywhere. Those who flowed were lucky and happened to be in the right place at the right time. Nothing else and none felt entitled.
108 people. It's one thing to have not allowed the unwashed masses, ie Pinnacle pilots (XJ pilots hate us, because we are stupid?) participate in this flow as a result of the purchase... but to short change every new hire at XJ prior to July 1 2010 (the day that music died) out of their earned slot is not fathomable. If you earned it, so did any XJ new hire. I didn't, because I went to the idiot airline. As an aside, my buddies tell me that from day 1 in class, they were told how bad everyone at Pinnacle was... And yet, in the other house, we never even talked about any other regional carrier in the course of training. Back to topic: why is it such a foreign concept that new hires at regionals and FOs in general need to be compensated fairly? I ran the numbers once, but you dismiss it as socialism. I guess I'll just go with the boilerplate agree to disagree, because I don't see it that way. Even DALPA gets a fixed dollar amount from DAL, that the folks in charge of the union split up into various sections of the contract. As far as responsibility in the cockpit, CRM would say that both crewmembers are equally responsible for the outcome. Of course one person has to make the final decision, and the FO shouldn't question the decision unless he or she feels they are about to die or violate a reg or SOP. Dismissing the right seat responsibility strikes me as you assuming all your FOs are idiots who warm the seat next to you. I'm sure that you've flown with CAs at the regional level you scratch your head at... Let's revisit this: top scale FO vs 4 year CA (none of those at Endeavor anyway):: $39 FO, $69 CA (56.5%) top scale FO vs top scale CA $39 FO, $87 CA (44.8%) Both numbers are too low, but are 7 year FOs the liability to CAs that wet-commercials off the street are? Hardly.... If they truly want to encourage up-and-out, FO scale should be increased. If the the top scale FO became 12 years, at current top vs 4 %, that's $49.16.... Why did so many people, at 2011 JCBA rates, and pre-bankruptcy XJ rates, want to stay? The regional model does not work with folks staying... Bottom line, they HAVE to move on. How do you make it happen? I don't have the answers, but treating the guys stuck waiting to upgrade better might be a start. Encourage people to move on. Re-think pay scales at the regional level without knee-jerk reactions of "it's different, so it's socialist". Lastly, regional FOs are just as capable as the CAs, if not more. If you've been paying attention, many current 7+ year FOs WERE CAs.... |
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1717723)
And yet 2007 XJ hires had jobs at mainline waiting for them. Heck, more senior than that.
108 people. It's one thing to have not allowed the unwashed masses, ie Pinnacle pilots (XJ pilots hate us, because we are stupid?) participate in this flow as a result of the purchase... but to short change every new hire at XJ prior to July 1 2010 (the day that music died) out of their earned slot is not fathomable. If you earned it, so did any XJ new hire. I didn't, because I went to the idiot airline. As an aside, my buddies tell me that from day 1 in class, they were told how bad everyone at Pinnacle was... And yet, in the other house, we never even talked about any other regional carrier in the course of training. Back to topic: why is it such a foreign concept that new hires at regionals and FOs in general need to be compensated fairly? I ran the numbers once, but you dismiss it as socialism. I guess I'll just go with the boilerplate agree to disagree, because I don't see it that way. Even DALPA gets a fixed dollar amount from DAL, that the folks in charge of the union split up into various sections of the contract. As far as responsibility in the cockpit, CRM would say that both crewmembers are equally responsible for the outcome. Of course one person has to make the final decision, and the FO shouldn't question the decision unless he or she feels they are about to die or violate a reg or SOP. Dismissing the right seat responsibility strikes me as you assuming all your FOs are idiots who warm the seat next to you. I'm sure that you've flown with CAs at the regional level you scratch your head at... Let's revisit this: top scale FO vs 4 year CA (none of those at Endeavor anyway):: $39 FO, $69 CA (56.5%) top scale FO vs top scale CA $39 FO, $87 CA (44.8%) Both numbers are too low, but are 7 year FOs the liability to CAs that wet-commercials off the street are? Hardly.... If they truly want to encourage up-and-out, FO scale should be increased. If the the top scale FO became 12 years, at current top vs 4 %, that's $49.16.... Why did so many people, at 2011 JCBA rates, and pre-bankruptcy XJ rates, want to stay? The regional model does not work with folks staying... Bottom line, they HAVE to move on. How do you make it happen? I don't have the answers, but treating the guys stuck waiting to upgrade better might be a start. Encourage people to move on. Re-think pay scales at the regional level without knee-jerk reactions of "it's different, so it's socialist". Lastly, regional FOs are just as capable as the CAs, if not more. If you've been paying attention, many current 7+ year FOs WERE CAs.... |
Originally Posted by cencal83406
(Post 1717723)
The regional model does not work with folks staying... Bottom line, they HAVE to move on.
Originally Posted by delta1067
(Post 1717723)
There is no precedent to retool pay scales based upon time to upgrade. If someone wants to be a regional lifer than that is their prerogative. No one owes you their left seat.
|
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1717732)
Your FO pay rates are very close to Compass FO pay rates. I don't hear anyone at Compass complaining about it. I think your complaint is that you are stuck in the right seat. If there were 2-3 year upgrades happening at Endeavor that I doubt anyone would be complaining about FO pay. It's always been a seniority based system. There is no precedent to retool pay scales based upon time to upgrade. If someone wants to be a regional lifer than that is their prerogative. No one owes you their left seat. Are you really mad about the pay or the fact that you can't get into the right seat? I doubt you would be complaining about FO pay if you were a Captain.
But no, I'm not mad about not getting into the seat. There were a lot of closed door discussions and one Bloch award, coupled with a bankruptcy, that made left seat 9E an impossible venture. My buddies who are protected on the 900, and are senior, can get CA at a more junior number than I can, waiting for a 200 slot, since that's all I can get. Was Compass designed with moving on in mind? Tha could explain the short upgrade. For a year, you could retire very richly here at Endeavor. Only when our pay got slashed in the fire sale did the top start gradually moving. Not all of them have finished their AirlineApps DAL app yet either. The problem with regional lifers is they kill their companies with their extremely top heavy pay. Furloughing / losing planes doesn't help... It only gets rid of the guy making $25-$39 per hour... I guess it doesn't really matter any more though, Endeavor's fate is sealed. What happened to all this talk of CAs having more skin in the game? Seems like the fact that CAs are sitting right seat making $39 an hour wasn't lost on you... |
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1717612)
No there weren't. The NWA interview machine was up and running during the brief window where a few dozen XJ pilots flowed to NWA. PM me one pilot who "had their NWA interview cancelled due to the flow at XJ" You claim a lot?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands