Interesting!
10-07-2014 | 07:56 PM
#1
Thread Starter
MK Ultra Candidate
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Prime Leader of Boko Harumph
10-07-2014 | 08:07 PM
#2
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: (In class)
Basically they held up the exemption in the ATSA for reporting possibly dangerous people.
"The Court also noted that denying immunity for substantially true reports would defeat the pur*pose of ATSA immunity: 'to ensure that air carriers and their employ*ees would not hesitate to provide the TSA with the information it needed'."
http://www.faegrebd.com/mobile/showu...px?show=21076&
"The Court also noted that denying immunity for substantially true reports would defeat the pur*pose of ATSA immunity: 'to ensure that air carriers and their employ*ees would not hesitate to provide the TSA with the information it needed'."
http://www.faegrebd.com/mobile/showu...px?show=21076&
10-07-2014 | 08:27 PM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Basically they held up the exemption in the ATSA for reporting possibly dangerous people.
"The Court also noted that denying immunity for substantially true reports would defeat the pur*pose of ATSA immunity: 'to ensure that air carriers and their employ*ees would not hesitate to provide the TSA with the information it needed'."
Supreme Court Decides Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper | Faegre Baker Daniels
"The Court also noted that denying immunity for substantially true reports would defeat the pur*pose of ATSA immunity: 'to ensure that air carriers and their employ*ees would not hesitate to provide the TSA with the information it needed'."
Supreme Court Decides Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper | Faegre Baker Daniels
IMHO his former employer overstepped their bounds without just cause. The Court found that the Airliner had no proof that the Pilot was armed. It should have ended there.
The Pilot's FFDO status and associated training/vetting also should have mitigated and overridden this obvious unnecessary overreaction by both the airline and the TSA.
I believe that a good portion of the U.S. populous have been over sensitized to a person's personal choice to enhance his/her personal protection by LEGALLY possessing a firearm.
People need to spend time in States like Texas and Arizona and in rural/farm areas of the U.S. where firearms are considered as common as a hammer to a carpenter.
10-08-2014 | 07:02 AM
#7
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: doggy style
Exactly, I'm curious how irate this guy was. Who gets upset over their own lack of skills and goes off on an employer? My guess is this guy did something to bring this upon himself, especially if ALPA couldn't save him.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
