![]() |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 1833961)
So is BS that the company said what they said? It was a meeting between AAG and our MeC.
Sorry if you don't like the color of the Kool aid now. Looks like we accepted a contract close to PSA and it will change for the best. So at the end you guys are growing but at least we have a better flow and a contract. |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1834123)
I think the idea that Envoy has a better contract than PSA is highly debatable. From what it looks like their SAP makes quality of life much better than all but the most senior of Envoy pilots could hope to attain.
Psa management have been manipulation their critical coverage, the Sap is not working as advertise. Probably for some people but for everyone. Source: PSA CA friend of mine. |
Isn't bZzzzt an ex envoy guy that ran off somewhere else? That would make a lot of sense. He wants to see envoy fail so his decision was the right one. He wants to see this place fail, the demise of many pilots and thur families, so his decision can be vilified? Ouch. What is wrong with our society?
|
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1834138)
Isn't bZzzzt an ex envoy guy that ran off somewhere else? That would make a lot of sense. He wants to see envoy fail so his decision was the right one. He wants to see this place fail, the demise of many pilots and thur families, so his decision can be vilified? Ouch. What is wrong with our society?
|
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1834138)
Isn't bZzzzt an ex envoy guy that ran off somewhere else? That would make a lot of sense. He wants to see envoy fail so his decision was the right one. He wants to see this place fail, the demise of many pilots and thur families, so his decision can be vilified? Ouch. What is wrong with our society?
|
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 1834132)
Sorry to bust your bubble...
Psa management have been manipulation their critical coverage, the Sap is not working as advertise. Probably for some people but for everyone. Source: PSA CA friend of mine. The critical coverage thing truly is an issue, but the SAP is doing just fine. The company obviously doesn't want people using the SAP and therefore will not help anyone who is having issues. The union produced a guide that removes 90% of said issues, allowing pilots to use the SAP. It takes a little time(sometimes a few hours) to process trades but you can still get the schedule you want with a little patience. |
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1833982)
I don't care how you take it. I laughed and that's the only thing I care about. I'd be happy to give you a ride in one of your former airplanes some day.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1833982)
I don't care how you take it. I laughed and that's the only thing I care about. I'd be happy to give you a ride in one of your former airplanes some day.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1833982)
I don't care how you take it. I laughed and that's the only thing I care about. I'd be happy to give you a ride in one of your former airplanes some day.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 1834320)
Dude come on... No sense in rubbing salt in an obviously sore wound. The truth is PSA is going to to be a big regional for AAG. And one day we may face what Envoy has been facing the past couple years. Yes PC goes around flaming other pilot groups. Does he deserve to be treated like a jerk sometimes? Maybe. But a lot of people read these boards (including management) so don't go around jesting other pilot groups that way. I'm glad to be at a growing airline. And it is unfortunately at the expense of another ALPA pilot group which is just a shame.
However, it is people like CBreezy that have really brought out the worst in me. This is not the first time he has shown his true colors either. |
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1832921)
Really this place right now is populated by pilot groups benefiting from the demise of envoy. You think they want to hear anything even remotely good? Do you think they will wish us well, or just bash? Why bother? If pilots from other tegionals want to hear this stuff bad enough, they can get it from their friends.
|
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1834332)
However, it is people like CBreezy that have really brought out the worst in me. This is not the first time he has shown his true colors either. Lets be civil and move on. I honestly wish Envoy the best of luck in their negotiations and that things improve. |
Originally Posted by Navmode
(Post 1834334)
On the other hand, I'd be glad to see every pilot make $100k. Don't kid yourself into a pilot vs. pilot mentality. It's management pulling the strings. The sooner we forget that, the easier it is to become the puppets.
|
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1834340)
I just don't see a lot of union emails being pasted on APC from other regionals is all. I think it more appropriate for a private forum. Just my opinion I guess.
|
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1834332)
I don't really think it is flaming. Initially I was even somewhat civil about it. I really have only ever gone at PSA, and a little Mesa. I am an envoy pilot, and as you just so eloquently stated, my world was being destroyed by your airline. As much as I hate to admit it, I have been calmed by rational arguments from people like Pagey.
However, it is people like CBreezy that have really brought out the worst in me. This is not the first time he has shown his true colors either. |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 1834343)
Well, all I know is that you frequent the PSA thread and talk crap constantly. And that's your prerogative and no one will stop you. But life's just too short. If you are that unhappy with the way your career is turning out, then make a new one. This is my 3rd career. Better and worse than my previous 2 in different ways. I have no illusions about being a regional pilot, it's all a roll of the dice. EVERY pilot should have back-up plans in case things don't turn out the way they want. And besides, your anger is basically directed at about 300 of our now 1,000+ pilot group. And many of those original 300 are not even at PSA anymore. As unfortunate as it may seem to you, many new hires don't have a clue about what has happened to Envoy. Those of us who do certainly feel for you. And it is completely unprofessional for those in our ranks to go around saying hurtful things.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 1834343)
Well, all I know is that you frequent the PSA thread and talk crap constantly. And that's your prerogative and no one will stop you. But life's just too short. If you are that unhappy with the way your career is turning out, then make a new one. This is my 3rd career. Better and worse than my previous 2 in different ways. I have no illusions about being a regional pilot, it's all a roll of the dice. EVERY pilot should have back-up plans in case things don't turn out the way they want. And besides, your anger is basically directed at about 300 of our now 1,000+ pilot group. And many of those original 300 are not even at PSA anymore. As unfortunate as it may seem to you, many new hires don't have a clue about what has happened to Envoy. Those of us who do certainly feel for you. And it is completely unprofessional for those in our ranks to go around saying hurtful things.
Where my anger comes from is how bad I feel for my FOs. They have had it rough here at Eagle. Much harder than I ever did. It is hard to think this career can be anything but fair when I see my 7 year FOs suffering while some kid is going to be in the left seat at PSA in a year. It burns. I have never agreed, and probably never will, with the reasoning behind PSA yes voters. Let us not rehash that here, again. That being said, wounds heal if you let them. |
Originally Posted by Navmode
(Post 1834342)
I agree with you. I'm just saying not everyone wants to see you burn just to get a few airplanes.
|
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1834332)
I don't really think it is flaming. Initially I was even somewhat civil about it. I really have only ever gone at PSA, and a little Mesa. I am an envoy pilot, and as you just so eloquently stated, my world was being destroyed by your airline. As much as I hate to admit it, I have been calmed by rational arguments from people like Pagey.
However, it is people like CBreezy that have really brought out the worst in me. This is not the first time he has shown his true colors either. It was Tom Brady wasn't it? |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 1833690)
from someone in EL
Talked to a rep today highlights follows: Isom was straightforward during the meeting answering questions quickly and comfortably. Hashimoto was much more guarded and cagy. The company admitted that they expected attrition to slow or stop after the TA and it hasn't and they are "concerned". Someone at the meeting admitted that they have intentionally been putting us through the wringer for the last 18 months essentially toying with us since the no vote. PSA training is at capacity and cannot increase hiring or training anymore therefore the only new flying they will get is being pushed out into the future. The OT and hotel LOA has been approved. New scheduling software has been paid for and is being implemented for future schedules. CDO's may be going away. iPad talks continue and the company wants them at PSA and Piedmont as well this is slowing implementation down. 4g connectivity to have releases available paperless. Fabregas was sent to HQ after the meeting to go over ideas about staffing and attrition with Hashimoto. I really hope the best for those at Eagle (Envoy). I have a few friends working there, and they have families they're trying to take care of, and all this craziness has had a large effect on their future with the company. |
parker and his boys have gotten over there insecurity brought upon them by a bunch of little peons telling the NO 4 times and now they realize they went to far and want to make up.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 1834492)
parker and his boys have gotten over there insecurity brought upon them by a bunch of little peons telling the NO 4 times and now they realize they went to far and want to make up.
It's simple--Kirby and Parker had a plan when they took over, and everything that has happened has simply been their attempts to make that plan work. There is no need to build a digestible story with moral arcs. The plan was to massively shrink Eagle/Envoy, diversify the feed, and lock in the whole cheap-labor regional system for the long term before it could break down (decade-long contracts). They wanted to define a career path that starts with being a severely underpaid regional pilot, so that new pilots are funneled in at the bottom instead of the middle and AA keeps a steady supply of labor (flow). And they wanted to solve the problem, from their perspective, of "overpaid" long-term regional pilots not by guaranteeing career progression but by simply capping pay at an "acceptable" longevity. All of these things are now accomplished. They have everything they want, and for the long term. So if it takes some "investment" now to keep everything well-oiled and humming along, they are perfectly willing to do that. But don't try to assign them sentiments as if they're now "realizing they went too far" or "rewarding us" or trying to "bury the hatchet". They're not throwing money at something they destroyed, they're investing in a system they created. Everything, from their perspective, went exactly according to plan. If you hate the regional model, this should make you very angry. But, as it turns out, a strong majority are totally fine with it. Is what it is. |
Originally Posted by wareagle
(Post 1834620)
No. I understand that there's a strong psychological urge to build this narrative, but it's ridiculous.
It's simple--Kirby and Parker had a plan when they took over, and everything that has happened has simply been their attempts to make that plan work. There is no need to build a digestible story with moral arcs. The plan was to massively shrink Eagle/Envoy, diversify the feed, and lock in the whole cheap-labor regional system for the long term before it could break down (decade-long contracts). They wanted to define a career path that starts with being a severely underpaid regional pilot, so that new pilots are funneled in at the bottom instead of the middle and AA keeps a steady supply of labor (flow). And they wanted to solve the problem, from their perspective, of "overpaid" long-term regional pilots not by guaranteeing career progression but by simply capping pay at an "acceptable" longevity. All of these things are now accomplished. They have everything they want, and for the long term. So if it takes some "investment" now to keep everything well-oiled and humming along, they are perfectly willing to do that. But don't try to assign them sentiments as if they're now "realizing they went too far" or "rewarding us" or trying to "bury the hatchet". They're not throwing money at something they destroyed, they're investing in a system they created. Everything, from their perspective, went exactly according to plan. If you hate the regional model, this should make you very angry. But, as it turns out, a strong majority are totally fine with it. Is what it is. |
Originally Posted by wareagle
(Post 1834620)
No. I understand that there's a strong psychological urge to build this narrative, but it's ridiculous.
It's simple--Kirby and Parker had a plan when they took over, and everything that has happened has simply been their attempts to make that plan work. There is no need to build a digestible story with moral arcs. The plan was to massively shrink Eagle/Envoy, diversify the feed, and lock in the whole cheap-labor regional system for the long term before it could break down (decade-long contracts). They wanted to define a career path that starts with being a severely underpaid regional pilot, so that new pilots are funneled in at the bottom instead of the middle and AA keeps a steady supply of labor (flow). And they wanted to solve the problem, from their perspective, of "overpaid" long-term regional pilots not by guaranteeing career progression but by simply capping pay at an "acceptable" longevity. All of these things are now accomplished. They have everything they want, and for the long term. So if it takes some "investment" now to keep everything well-oiled and humming along, they are perfectly willing to do that. But don't try to assign them sentiments as if they're now "realizing they went too far" or "rewarding us" or trying to "bury the hatchet". They're not throwing money at something they destroyed, they're investing in a system they created. Everything, from their perspective, went exactly according to plan. If you hate the regional model, this should make you very angry. But, as it turns out, a strong majority are totally fine with it. Is what it is. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands