Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   ERJ vs CRJ? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/86812-erj-vs-crj.html)

FaceBiter 03-04-2015 02:26 PM

Bro, I've never even let loose. You don't even know what a full FB swing is.

PilotCrusader 03-04-2015 04:08 PM


Originally Posted by FaceBiter (Post 1836978)
Sweet baby jesus are you guys a ratard? What RJ is better? What airplane look the kewlest on my instagram?

"Chicks are too dumb to realize United Express isn't really United."

Engines under the wings? Is this airliners.net? Get a grip.

Word.

(Filler)

kfahmi 03-04-2015 04:44 PM

As far as engines under the wings go, I don't see the appeal. On the 175 I can't imagine you could cross-control very much during a crosswind landing, or you'd get an engine strike. Those engines look like they're just ready to eat some pavement.

Of course, I've never flown one, so I speak from a position of ignorance. Any -175 drivers on here who can tell us?

Bellanca 03-04-2015 06:10 PM

Overwing jet seaplane time > than all of this CRJ vs ERJ nonsense.

http://barrieaircraft.com/images/beriev-be-200-02.jpg

Seminole00 03-04-2015 06:13 PM

Some Delta Mad Dog driver is probably laughing his a-s-s off as we speak.

qazWSX 03-04-2015 06:17 PM


Originally Posted by snippercr (Post 1836687)
This is going to be a great thread. GREAT thread, I tell you.

Why do people care what they fly? In the end if they pay me appropriately and I do not have to commute, I'll flying a GD Metroliner for all it's worth. Turboprop, back-mounted jets, wing mounted jets, auto-throttles, who cares. It's just a freaking job. As long as you dont hate your life at it, forget about it when you are with your family and it allows you to have a good QOL, screw the rest. Do office workers ask if they like one cubical better than the other?

Boy are you out of touch. Accelerate/slow to 35 knot T/O performance?

Lose of engine at V1 may result in negative clime performance?

None of you guys are willing to fly that anymore.

GravyRobber 03-04-2015 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by kfahmi (Post 1837160)
As far as engines under the wings go, I don't see the appeal. On the 175 I can't imagine you could cross-control very much during a crosswind landing, or you'd get an engine strike. Those engines look like they're just ready to eat some pavement.

Of course, I've never flown one, so I speak from a position of ignorance. Any -175 drivers on here who can tell us?

16-18° depending on strut compression. Quite a bit more than you'd think by just looking at it.

kfahmi 03-04-2015 08:12 PM


Originally Posted by GravyRobber (Post 1837258)
16-18° depending on strut compression. Quite a bit more than you'd think by just looking at it.

Interesting, thanks!

How does it perform up high compared to a -200? Or a -700?

kfahmi 03-04-2015 08:13 PM


Originally Posted by Bellanca (Post 1837245)
Overwing jet seaplane time > than all of this CRJ vs ERJ nonsense.

http://barrieaircraft.com/images/beriev-be-200-02.jpg

I don't care who you are, that is one awesome-looking ride. Is it vodka-powered?

Bellanca 03-05-2015 07:02 AM


Originally Posted by kfahmi (Post 1837308)
I don't care who you are, that is one awesome-looking ride. Is it vodka-powered?

Yep, it's a Beriev Be-200.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands