Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Mike Enzi's attempts to repeal the ATP Law (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/87089-mike-enzis-attempts-repeal-atp-law.html)

bedrock 03-23-2015 02:45 PM


Originally Posted by RB211 (Post 1848095)
I don't view management as an enemy either, however their doing the bidding of their investors, well because they have to.
All of us, every American is an indentured servant to the very top elite in this Country, the top .001% of the top 1%. Every election is a dog and pony show, to distract us, make us think that we have a say, HAH

I view the 2-party presidential elections as a choice between Al Capone or John Gotti. Congressional elections run the gamut from Gotti to Carrot Top.

NineGturn 03-23-2015 02:50 PM

RB211, You are still missing my point.

I don't think this model can survive just because you say that a person who loves his job as much as a pilot doesn't need to be paid well. You are essentially arguing that being an airline pilot should not be considered as more than a hobby and pilots are lucky to make any money at all.

Compensation doesn't correlate to job satisfaction, it correlates to supply vs demand. The airlines have used seniority to get around supply and demand to artificially lower pay at the regionals which is why pay is so different from one end of the spectrum to the other.

I don't think anyone approaches professional flying with that attitude after working for more than a year at least. It's about the carrot. They expect that someday they will rise above it and it will be worthwhile. Airlines and bean counters have exploited this phenomenon through the seniority system without which it wouldn't be possible to the extent that pilots become "trapped" in the rat race feeling they can't quit and come back later and they can't easily jump between jobs looking for the better pay.

The exploits have simply gone too far and now it must be reeled back in for it to continue to work. Reeling in means pushing the larger regional jets back to the majors who often already own (lease) them and reducing the labor demand on the regionals.

The only other option would be to completely reconfigure the business model by eliminating seniority as I described. There is no other way for Regionals to sustain their present level and continue to operate as they do.

This is a good thing.

bedrock 03-23-2015 03:02 PM

I just finished watching a video of how easy it is to fly the F-35. It takes off by itself, it lands(vertically) nearly by itself, and is operated by a smart phone type interface. The fact is, the skills needed to fly jets are getting simpler. This where global aviation is heading.

gloopy 03-23-2015 03:10 PM


Originally Posted by bedrock (Post 1848111)
I just finished watching a video of how easy it is to fly the F-35. It takes off by itself, it lands(vertically) nearly by itself, and is operated by a smart phone type interface. The fact is, the skills needed to fly jets are getting simpler. This where global aviation is heading.

So?
……...

USMCFLYR 03-23-2015 03:18 PM


Originally Posted by bedrock (Post 1848111)
I just finished watching a video of how easy it is to fly the F-35. It takes off by itself, it lands(vertically) nearly by itself, and is operated by a smart phone type interface. The fact is, the skills needed to fly jets are getting simpler. This where global aviation is heading.

Flying any of the 4th generation and above aircraft is fairly easy.
You solo a F/A-18 after 3 flights; operating it as a weapons system is where the skill (and training) comes in.

Post that link though if you would -- I'd like to see it.

RB211 03-23-2015 03:20 PM


Originally Posted by NineGturn (Post 1848106)
RB211, You are still missing my point.

I don't think this model can survive just because you say that a person who loves his job as much as a pilot doesn't need to be paid well. You are essentially arguing that being an airline pilot should not be considered as more than a hobby and pilots are lucky to make any money at all.

Compensation doesn't correlate to job satisfaction, it correlates to supply vs demand. The airlines have used seniority to get around supply and demand to artificially lower pay at the regionals which is why pay is so different from one end of the spectrum to the other.

I don't think anyone approaches professional flying with that attitude after working for more than a year at least. It's about the carrot. They expect that someday they will rise above it and it will be worthwhile. Airlines and bean counters have exploited this phenomenon through the seniority system without which it wouldn't be possible to the extent that pilots become "trapped" in the rat race feeling they can't quit and come back later and they can't easily jump between jobs looking for the better pay.

The exploits have simply gone too far and now it must be reeled back in for it to continue to work. Reeling in means pushing the larger regional jets back to the majors who often already own (lease) them and reducing the labor demand on the regionals.

The only other option would be to completely reconfigure the business model by eliminating seniority as I described. There is no other way for Regionals to sustain their present level and continue to operate as they do.

This is a good thing.

I see your point about the regional model not surviving. This is why I suggest we all will still be on a B pay scale, flying RJ's at a mainline. The only difference is that the regionals will be part of the mainline.
The seniority system is never going away, and mainline pilots will continue to screw over the new guy to give themselves more money every time a new contract comes out. I would not be surprised if mainline contracts had pay scales for CRJ's and ERJ's. Management will always create a "Us vs Them" mentality to split pilot groups. No pilot group gives a rats ass about another pilot group. That is just the ugly truth.

TallFlyer 03-24-2015 06:42 AM


Originally Posted by Cubdriver (Post 1846527)
I do not know what the differences between 121 and 135 passenger ops are. Good question for someone who does know. I have 121 passenger experience and 135 cargo experience, which is not enough to go on.

How much 121 experience do you have?

Cubdriver 03-24-2015 07:06 AM


Originally Posted by TallFlyer (Post 1848433)
How much 121 experience do you have?

Why do you ask?

bedrock 03-24-2015 07:28 AM


Originally Posted by USMCFLYR (Post 1848126)
Flying any of the 4th generation and above aircraft is fairly easy.
You solo a F/A-18 after 3 flights; operating it as a weapons system is where the skill (and training) comes in.

Post that link though if you would -- I'd like to see it.

I'll try to find it again. It was in the middle of an Australian program called "Four Corners" I think--it was about what a white elephant the F-35 was, esp. compared to the Su-35.

NineGturn 03-24-2015 08:21 AM

3rd Gen fighters were where they discovered "information overload" and realized the pilot could become overwhelmed.

4th Gen fighters used fly by wire systems to make flying the plane relatively easy by design so the pilot could focus more on the mission and other life threatening distractions. The F35 goes even further by automating even more and may be the last generation where pilots are used at all.

Airlines are becoming that way. Just read an article in AW about how "low workload and boredom may have been a contributory factor" in an incident involving loss of control of a troop transport A330.

It seems to me the focus in training has moved from skill based experienced to procedures training...and from "Don't depend on the automation" to "trust the automation."


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:59 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands