PIT as a domicile
Top o the morning and pleasant beans to all.
I know that currently RAH is the only company with a PIT domicile. Any chance of others opening up there? Adieu |
Doubt it. Pit is a ghost town, unfortunately. Great airport.
|
Originally Posted by colonials13
(Post 1852060)
Top o the morning and pleasant beans to all.
I know that currently RAH is the only company with a PIT domicile. Any chance of others opening up there? Adieu |
I think the best anyone can hope for would be Southwest or Frontier wanting to make a larger presense but that's really about it. The big 3 airlines already have their surrounding hub cities making PIT unusable.
|
Originally Posted by Gearswinger
(Post 1852063)
Doubt it. Pit is a ghost town, unfortunately. Great airport.
|
That's upsetting. If only the airport authority and US Airways could have worked things out back then
|
Originally Posted by Gearswinger
(Post 1852063)
Doubt it. Pit is a ghost town, unfortunately. Great airport.
|
Originally Posted by yimke
(Post 1852588)
Great airport is stretching it a bit.
|
Wish you guys could have seen it back in the mid-90s. Place was hopping. Rome, London, Paris... Tons of transcons, tons of commuters... Sad
|
Originally Posted by yimke
(Post 1852588)
Great airport is stretching it a bit.
|
Since APA didn't cave in scope, I wouldn't be surprised to see an E190 presence there in the future,,..esp if AA/US buys some more of them.
MUCH stranger things have happened. |
I do remember PIT back in the late 90's, early 2000's. It was bustling with activity. Nowadays it's just an empty shell. I can't remember if it was Wolfe or Gangwal at the head of UsAir that gutted the place. They got their millions so it's all good I guess.
|
PIT suffers from the same thing as CVG. It doesn't have a lot of O/D traffic, is very expensive relative to other options driving distance (think CAK or CLE with PIT; DAY or SDF with CVG) and is just too close to other hubs with better international presence (PHL, JFK, CLT for PIT; DTW, JFK, ATL for CVG.)
|
Originally Posted by Avroman
(Post 1852924)
PIT suffers from the same thing as CVG. It doesn't have a lot of O/D traffic, is very expensive relative to other options driving distance (think CAK or CLE with PIT; DAY or SDF with CVG) and is just too close to other hubs with better international presence (PHL, JFK, CLT for PIT; DTW, JFK, ATL for CVG.)
I remember DAY as a hub for the original Piedmont. Following the merger that formed USAir(ways?), the company tried operating DAY and PIT but found they couldn't do so. DAY was closed as a hub because it was so close to PIT. When the new PIT was built, it was designed to be a hub airport. From that point of view, it is a great airport. |
Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
(Post 1852638)
Wish you guys could have seen it back in the mid-90s. Place was hopping. Rome, London, Paris... Tons of transcons, tons of commuters... Sad
|
Originally Posted by morerightrudder
(Post 1853131)
Still a lot of commuters at PIT...to PHL and DCA. The early morning flights are basically crew shuttles.
|
Originally Posted by morerightrudder
(Post 1853131)
Still a lot of commuters at PIT...to PHL and DCA. The early morning flights are basically crew shuttles.
No, I meant actual "commuters". The E gates (now a TSA parking lot) was filled over capacity with Dash 8s, Dornier 328s, Saabs, Jetstreams, Beech 1900s, and the occasional Shorts. Airplanes unrecognizable to this generation of pilots because they have spinny things on the front that make them go. |
Originally Posted by flyingreasemnky
(Post 1852069)
The only reason RAH has a domicile there is because they have some weird thing about crew domiciles being co-located with maintenance bases.
Originally Posted by FirstClass
(Post 1852121)
I think the best anyone can hope for would be Southwest or Frontier wanting to make a larger presense but that's really about it.
The US Airways dehubbing was 10 years ago and since then the local economy has stabilized around Eds/Meds, Financial and legal services, Robotics, and Energy. PIT will be just fine in the years ahead. |
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1853259)
Agreed on Southwest (Frontier doesn't even serve PIT). In fact, local rumors are about a major Southwest build up at PIT in 2016.
The US Airways dehubbing was 10 years ago and since then the local economy has stabilized around Eds/Meds, Financial and legal services, Robotics, and Energy. PIT will be just fine in the years ahead. |
Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
(Post 1853257)
No, I meant actual "commuters". The E gates (now a TSA parking lot) was filled over capacity with Dash 8s, Dornier 328s, Saabs, Jetstreams, Beech 1900s, and the occasional Shorts. Airplanes unrecognizable to this generation of pilots because they have spinny things on the front that make them go.
|
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1853259)
Not really..., Republic has a handful of flights at PIT as Delta Connection; and United Express; and US Airways Express; and American Eagle. Add them all up and it makes sense for Republic to have a base at PIT.
|
Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
(Post 1853257)
No, I meant actual "commuters". The E gates (now a TSA parking lot) was filled over capacity with Dash 8s, Dornier 328s, Saabs, Jetstreams, Beech 1900s, and the occasional Shorts. Airplanes unrecognizable to this generation of pilots because they have spinny things on the front that make them go.
|
I flew them for Chautauqua before Shuttle America even existed
|
Blame county government for the usairways withdrawal. The airline was getting screwed over by Onorato and his greedy small minded government buddies. Playing chicken with over 10000 local jobs is never a good idea, but they did it anyway.
|
Originally Posted by sqwkvfr
(Post 1853855)
Yes really. The reason Republic has all of those flights is because they have a large MX base there....
|
PIT is one of the most expensive airports in the country. Just as airlines have a metric of "seat mile costs", so airports have "Cost per enplaned Passenger". PIT's current costs are over $15 a head. In contrast CLT is just over $1.
PIT is one of the only airports where both SWA and Jet Blue have reduced service. Because CLE and CMH are nearby people will drive to those airports for lower fares. A cost of $15 per head X 100 pax is $1500 per flight. That's a lot of money to pay PIT airport to operate there. Alligent is serving PIT via the Latrobe airport. They don't pay any landing fees or significant taxes. The station is part time. The fuel cost is equivalent. Airport Costs are now just as significant as per mile seat costs for the airline. PIT and Allegheny County have done a terrible job of controlling costs. The Allegheny County Aviation budget for operating PIT and Allegheny Co. Airport, is greater than the entire budget of the State of Maryland. BWI has over 6 times the traffic of PIT yet operates at a fraction of the cost. That is the reason it is unlikely that any airline will hub in PIT. It is simply too expensive to operate there. |
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1855166)
Republic has all of those flights there due to the network planers at the major partners. The majors plan the flights of their regional partners to optimize the network of the major carrier, not vice versa. Delta, American, etc couldn't give two sh/ts where Republic has their mx bases.
Also, Republic tried to feed it's American 175 flying from it's CMH base, but American said they couldn't because Eagle (Envoy) already has a MX base there. |
Wait until AA buys a bunch more E190s since APA didn't cave on scope. Already a LUS maintenance presence there, just sayin,,,,.MUCH stranger things have happened.
|
Ah, Allegiant isn't doing Pittsburgh via Latrobe, that's Spirit doing Latrobe. Allegiant just started doing pit out PIT.
|
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1855166)
Republic has all of those flights there due to the network planers at the major partners. The majors plan the flights of their regional partners to optimize the network of the major carrier, not vice versa. Delta, American, etc couldn't give two sh/ts where Republic has their mx bases.
|
Originally Posted by PerpetualFlyer
(Post 1856026)
Yes, the majors do give two sh!t$ about mx bases. Just look at ANY regional airline. If there's a mx base, they will operate a majority of the flights there. STL for TSA, COS MKE TUS FAT and a few others for SkyWest, and the ones already mentioned for Republic. Are you that stupid to not see the connection?
Originally Posted by PerpetualFlyer
(Post 1856026)
Are you that stupid to not see the connection?
|
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1856058)
Do you possibly think that the regionals made the obvious choice in many cases to locate mx and crew bases where they have a large number of flights, just like any other airline? For how many years has TSA and Skywest had a large operation in those cities you list?
I see you're a real class act. |
Originally Posted by sqwkvfr
(Post 1856095)
Do you possibly think that you could just admit that you shot your mouth off about something that you apparently know very little about?
|
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1856107)
With all the whipsawing and changes between major partners that the regionals have gone through over the past years, do you seriously believe the major airlines will plan their networks based on where regionals currently are? Why do you think bases open and close over the long run? Maybe you really do believe that. You probably wipe your @ss then take a dump too.
|
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1856107)
With all the whipsawing and changes between major partners that the regionals have gone through over the past years, do you seriously believe the major airlines will plan their networks based on where regionals currently are? Why do you think bases open and close over the long run? Maybe you really do believe that. You probably wipe your @ss then take a dump too.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1856112)
I'm sure the regionals can offer lower costs to certain cities based on operational need. Why is it that TSA/GJ have any continued presence in STL, RAH in PIT or PSA in DAY? If it is part of the agreement that the RFP cost is based on certain cities in the network, then the major is obligated to follow it. Yes, regional airlines are mostly at the whim of their major partners, but if you think they do it at risk of making no money or running an incredibly expensive operation with repos to maintenance outstations, then you are really have no idea what goes on behind closed doors.
|
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1856107)
You probably wipe your @ss then take a dump too.
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1856058)
I see you're a real class act.
Anyway, just....stop. You're defending a position that you should have never taken and arguing with people who clearly know far more than you just for the sake of attempting to appear correct. Stop. |
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1856126)
I don't disagree with what you are saying. My point was that the major will not include a city pair in its network just because it is a mx base for one of its regionals. Using PIT as an example, I notice Republic has a lot of ferry flights between PIT and CMH (9xxx flight numbers). Presumably to move aircraft to mx bases? I'm sure Republic would love for one of their major partners to operate CMH-PIT. But with those two cities both being non hubs and only a 3 hour drive, it makes no sense to operate flights, and in this example Republic having mx bases in both cities makes no difference to AA or DL or whoever.
|
Originally Posted by sqwkvfr
(Post 1856132)
Anyway, yes, they do. They have contractual agreements with regionals to operate the originator and terminator flights into the regional's MX bases. |
Originally Posted by J Dawg
(Post 1856139)
But the city pairs do not exist for that purpose! Its really not a difficult point :confused:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands