![]() |
Anything concerning cancellation pay?
|
Yes. Leg by leg.
|
Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
(Post 2000650)
No it does not. They will be operated by Republic. Cheapest labor in the 130 seat market. Management got one over again.
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 2000671)
It doesn't say anything because they will never turn a wheel
|
Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
(Post 2000690)
But there are orders for them. Seems short sighted to not have payrates for something that the company has committed to. If they aren't going to be on property company could have put whatever payrates they wanted on paper. As it stands it's set up to be decided by arbitration. How did that work out for the Q400 as a jet, or the other time it wasn't a jet, or the time the seat in the 190 wasn't actually a seat? See what I'm getting at?
|
Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
(Post 2000690)
But there are orders for them. Seems short sighted to not have payrates for something that the company has committed to. If they aren't going to be on property company could have put whatever payrates they wanted on paper. As it stands it's set up to be decided by arbitration. How did that work out for the Q400 as a jet, or the other time it wasn't a jet, or the time the seat in the 190 wasn't actually a seat? See what I'm getting at?
That's a valid point but realistically we will never fly those. If we do start flying them we have bigger problems in the industry than whether we have a current rate for them or not. Also you'll never find a perfect contract. If you vote no for every minor issue you find you'd never vote yes. You have to weigh the pros and cons. There are certainly cons in this, but the pros outweighed the cons. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 2000699)
Oh I know I was there for all of that mess.....but RAH will never again be anything more than a feeder airline. the C series will never see the light of day at RAH
What happened on the UAL mid term ESOP vote in the 90's? Pilots have crappy memories, as well proven to be greedy. "Scope scope scope!!!!!!! Oh, look at that money they're offering!!!!!" |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 2000699)
Oh I know I was there for all of that mess.....but RAH will never again be anything more than a feeder airline. the C series will never see the light of day at RAH
Ultimately there is no reason for a mainline carrier to want a 130 seat C Series aircraft in the current market. I could understand the 100 seat version but not the 130. |
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 2000717)
NEVER say NEVER......
What happened on the UAL mid term ESOP vote in the 90's? Pilots have crappy memories, as well proven to be greedy. "Scope scope scope!!!!!!! Oh, look at that money they're offering!!!!!" And E.S. will commute to the furthest outstation possible because God knows he won't get hired anywhere else. |
Originally Posted by TillerEnvy
(Post 2000732)
For sure. Good points. All you had to do was fool a large portion of "Loon" ies and boom...you have a ratified TA. They'll be flying 130 people around for $7 more than the 190 rates.
And E.S. will commute to the furthest outstation possible because God knows he won't get hired anywhere else. DESPITE being told that scope ISN'T one of the items.... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands