Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   RAH: Is the vote going to pass? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/91380-rah-vote-going-pass.html)

iriderockets 10-23-2015 09:46 AM

RAH: Is the vote going to pass?
 
Or do we need to start thinking about planning for potential work action / bankruptcy / looking for a new job

WesternSkies 10-23-2015 10:20 AM

You are implying that if it passes bankruptcy if off the table

iriderockets 10-23-2015 10:29 AM


Originally Posted by WesternSkies (Post 1998514)
You are implying that if it passes bankruptcy if off the table

Fair point. Although I think we would all agree that the risk of bankruptcy is greater if it doesn't pass.

Geardownflaps30 10-23-2015 12:03 PM


Originally Posted by iriderockets (Post 1998520)
Fair point. Although I think we would all agree that the risk of bankruptcy is greater if it doesn't pass.

First airline?

Aviatrx 10-23-2015 12:09 PM


Originally Posted by iriderockets (Post 1998520)
Fair point. Although I think we would all agree that the risk of bankruptcy is greater if it doesn't pass.

Well... If this new contract costs them more money, but solves there staffing problems it seems they still might be headed for bankruptcy for the purpose of gutting other contracts and reorganizing the business plan. I'm an outsider observing Republics situation and it looks very similar to some other FFD who have filed in the past decade

iriderockets 10-23-2015 01:26 PM


Originally Posted by Geardownflaps30 (Post 1998567)
First airline?

Yes my first.. in hindsight should have picked somewhere with a bit more stability, even if I have to commute.

Still, I'm optimistic that if they vote gets passed. Talking to some of my co-workers it does seem to be the consensus view that people will vote in favor.

Gearslinger01 10-25-2015 04:27 PM

I must say that I have seen more "vote yes" messages written in the usual places in the flight deck. 2 years ago "vote no" is all I saw.

Geardownflaps30 10-25-2015 07:07 PM


Originally Posted by Gearslinger01 (Post 1999684)
I must say that I have seen more "vote yes" messages written in the usual places in the flight deck. 2 years ago "vote no" is all I saw.

Haven't seen a single one...

Blue Team or Red?

Bob Loblaw 10-25-2015 08:21 PM

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/re...h-ta-poll.html

TarponSlayer 10-26-2015 07:19 AM

Everybody I talked to is a yes voter.

skyguy33 10-26-2015 09:57 AM

I've talked to 3 no-voters. The rest are yes (which was probably another 20, at least). It will pass.

Gearslinger01 10-26-2015 12:11 PM


Originally Posted by Geardownflaps30 (Post 1999760)
Haven't seen a single one...

Blue Team or Red?

Blue Team. I just did a United trip and even saw it in one of the new 175s.

Loon 10-27-2015 06:26 AM

The eleventh hour is upon us......

Geardownflaps30 10-27-2015 09:02 AM

Passed. 76% yes. 90% voted

Loon 10-27-2015 09:04 AM

Thanks to all my RAH brethren! Now let's move forward and make it a great company again!

Blackwing 10-27-2015 10:30 AM

What did first year pay go to in this deal?

A.FLOOR 10-27-2015 10:35 AM

Maybe I'm out of the loop, but does the contract say anything about the Cseries?

170driver 10-27-2015 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by Blackwing (Post 2000619)
What did first year pay go to in this deal?


$40.00/hr topping out around 53

seattlepilot 10-27-2015 11:14 AM


Originally Posted by Loon (Post 2000557)
Thanks to all my RAH brethren! Now let's move forward and make it a great company again!


With the same management ? Hahahah

GoHomeLeg 10-27-2015 11:16 AM


Originally Posted by pilotnicco (Post 2000623)
Maybe I'm out of the loop, but does the contract say anything about the Cseries?

No it does not. They will be operated by Republic. Cheapest labor in the 130 seat market. Management got one over again.

colonials13 10-27-2015 11:17 AM

Anything concerning cancellation pay?

TillerEnvy 10-27-2015 11:40 AM

Yes. Leg by leg.

MasterOfPuppets 10-27-2015 11:43 AM


Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg (Post 2000650)
No it does not. They will be operated by Republic. Cheapest labor in the 130 seat market. Management got one over again.

It doesn't say anything because they will never turn a wheel

GoHomeLeg 10-27-2015 12:23 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2000671)
It doesn't say anything because they will never turn a wheel

But there are orders for them. Seems short sighted to not have payrates for something that the company has committed to. If they aren't going to be on property company could have put whatever payrates they wanted on paper. As it stands it's set up to be decided by arbitration. How did that work out for the Q400 as a jet, or the other time it wasn't a jet, or the time the seat in the 190 wasn't actually a seat? See what I'm getting at?

MasterOfPuppets 10-27-2015 12:42 PM


Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg (Post 2000690)
But there are orders for them. Seems short sighted to not have payrates for something that the company has committed to. If they aren't going to be on property company could have put whatever payrates they wanted on paper. As it stands it's set up to be decided by arbitration. How did that work out for the Q400 as a jet, or the other time it wasn't a jet, or the time the seat in the 190 wasn't actually a seat? See what I'm getting at?

Oh I know I was there for all of that mess.....but RAH will never again be anything more than a feeder airline. the C series will never see the light of day at RAH

TrojanCMH 10-27-2015 12:59 PM


Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg (Post 2000690)
But there are orders for them. Seems short sighted to not have payrates for something that the company has committed to. If they aren't going to be on property company could have put whatever payrates they wanted on paper. As it stands it's set up to be decided by arbitration. How did that work out for the Q400 as a jet, or the other time it wasn't a jet, or the time the seat in the 190 wasn't actually a seat? See what I'm getting at?


That's a valid point but realistically we will never fly those. If we do start flying them we have bigger problems in the industry than whether we have a current rate for them or not. Also you'll never find a perfect contract. If you vote no for every minor issue you find you'd never vote yes. You have to weigh the pros and cons. There are certainly cons in this, but the pros outweighed the cons.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

John Carr 10-27-2015 01:01 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2000699)
Oh I know I was there for all of that mess.....but RAH will never again be anything more than a feeder airline. the C series will never see the light of day at RAH

NEVER say NEVER......

What happened on the UAL mid term ESOP vote in the 90's?

Pilots have crappy memories, as well proven to be greedy.

"Scope scope scope!!!!!!! Oh, look at that money they're offering!!!!!"

GoHomeLeg 10-27-2015 01:07 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2000699)
Oh I know I was there for all of that mess.....but RAH will never again be anything more than a feeder airline. the C series will never see the light of day at RAH

Republic can do FFD in the US for a foreign carrier like Norwegian (a company that already contracts out very significant portions of their operation and has tried desperately to break into the US). This will give them a VERY cheap way to do that. This was an opportunity to make management pay a fair rate...even if it was just on paper.

Ultimately there is no reason for a mainline carrier to want a 130 seat C Series aircraft in the current market. I could understand the 100 seat version but not the 130.

TillerEnvy 10-27-2015 01:37 PM


Originally Posted by John Carr (Post 2000717)
NEVER say NEVER......

What happened on the UAL mid term ESOP vote in the 90's?

Pilots have crappy memories, as well proven to be greedy.

"Scope scope scope!!!!!!! Oh, look at that money they're offering!!!!!"

For sure. Good points. All you had to do was fool a large portion of "Loon" ies and boom...you have a ratified TA. They'll be flying 130 people around for $7 more than the 190 rates.

And E.S. will commute to the furthest outstation possible because God knows he won't get hired anywhere else.

John Carr 10-27-2015 01:50 PM


Originally Posted by TillerEnvy (Post 2000732)
For sure. Good points. All you had to do was fool a large portion of "Loon" ies and boom...you have a ratified TA. They'll be flying 130 people around for $7 more than the 190 rates.

And E.S. will commute to the furthest outstation possible because God knows he won't get hired anywhere else.

My post wasn't so much about the RAH group as it was the UCH group having it brought up that a contract extension is on the table with certain items to be discussed.

DESPITE being told that scope ISN'T one of the items....

MasterOfPuppets 10-27-2015 01:53 PM

Y'all are just looking for reason to be upset......get it together. The fact that the Cseries is even in your thinking proves your grasping at straws.

MasterOfPuppets 10-27-2015 01:55 PM


Originally Posted by John Carr (Post 2000739)
My post wasn't so much about the RAH group as it was the UCH group having it brought up that a contract extension is on the table with certain items to be discussed.

DESPITE being told that scope ISN'T one of the items....

Your going to be dissapointed there John. Your hatred is misplaced.

TrojanCMH 10-27-2015 01:55 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2000742)
Y'all are just looking for reason to be upset......get it together. The fact that the Cseries is even in your thinking proves your grasping at straws.


You're*


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

TrojanCMH 10-27-2015 01:56 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2000742)
Y'all are just looking for reason to be upset......get it together. The fact that the Cseries is even in your thinking proves your grasping at straws.


But you're right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

John Carr 10-27-2015 02:55 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2000743)
Your going to be dissapointed there John. Your hatred is misplaced.

If you're reading it as "hatred", you're reading it wrong..........

But history isn't really on your side of that argument.

F9 Driver 10-27-2015 03:15 PM

Republic Airways’ Pilots Approve Labor Contra
 
Republic Airways’ Pilots Approve Labor Contract

Pact with 2,100 pilots expected to help the company’s business restructuring

Oct. 27, 2015 2:24 p.m. ET
0 COMMENTS
Regional carrier Republic Airways Holdings Inc., which warned over the summer that it could be forced to file for bankruptcy-court protection if it couldn’t solve its pressing pilot hiring and retention challenges, said Tuesday that a majority of its 2,100 aviators approved a new three-year labor contract that significantly raises pay and improves work rules.
The pact, which will go into effect in a few days, will succeed the current contract, which hadn’t been updated in eight years. The new deal lifts starting first-officer pay to $40 an hour, raises pay for other first officers and boosts captain pay. Indianapolis-based Republic said it would invest about $50 million a year over the three-year duration of the new contract, including signing bonuses and anniversary bonuses. This improved pay is expected to help Republic stem the loss of pilots to other airlines and revive its recruitment pipeline.
“The new contract recognizes the importance of our pilots in our future success and gives us a strong foundation on which to rebuild our operations and move forward with the restructuring of our airline,” said Matt Koscal, Republic’s vice president of human resources. Because it lacked enough pilots, Republic hasn’t been able to meet its contractual schedules for its major airline customers, American Airlines Group Inc., United Continental Holdings Inc., and Delta Air Lines Inc.
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which represents the Republic pilots, said its members “have more than earned this industry-leading contract,” according to Capt. David Bourne, director of the airline division of the union. About 90% of the eligible pilots participated in the vote, with 1,363 votes in favor and 421 against, the union said.
Earlier this year, American, United and Delta had allowed Republic to reduce its schedules. But Delta earlier this month sued Republic for breach of contract and recovery of damages for allegedly forcing Delta to cancel flights and preventing it from scheduling flights it otherwise would have scheduled. The suit was filed in Superior Court of Fulton County, Ga. Shortly afterward, Republic said it was aware of the complaint, denied it was in breach of Delta’s agreement, but declined to comment further.
Mr. Koscal, Republic’s human resources chief, said the company still has many challenges to overcome to achieve a successful restructuring of the regional airline. But the new pilot contract “helps move this process forward,” he said.
Write to Susan Carey at [email protected]
http://www.wsj.com/articles/republic-airways-pilots-approve-labor-contract-1445970253

MasterOfPuppets 10-27-2015 03:18 PM


Originally Posted by John Carr (Post 2000772)
If you're reading it as "hatred", you're reading it wrong..........

But history isn't really on your side of that argument.

However we have learned from our past mistakes. So history IS NOT doomed to repeat its self

dfwflyboy 10-27-2015 03:55 PM


Originally Posted by F9 Driver (Post 2000784)
Republic Airways’ Pilots Approve Labor Contract

Pact with 2,100 pilots expected to help the company’s business restructuring

Oct. 27, 2015 2:24 p.m. ET
0 COMMENTS
Regional carrier Republic Airways Holdings Inc., which warned over the summer that it could be forced to file for bankruptcy-court protection if it couldn’t solve its pressing pilot hiring and retention challenges, said Tuesday that a majority of its 2,100 aviators approved a new three-year labor contract that significantly raises pay and improves work rules.
The pact, which will go into effect in a few days, will succeed the current contract, which hadn’t been updated in eight years. The new deal lifts starting first-officer pay to $40 an hour, raises pay for other first officers and boosts captain pay. Indianapolis-based Republic said it would invest about $50 million a year over the three-year duration of the new contract, including signing bonuses and anniversary bonuses. This improved pay is expected to help Republic stem the loss of pilots to other airlines and revive its recruitment pipeline.
“The new contract recognizes the importance of our pilots in our future success and gives us a strong foundation on which to rebuild our operations and move forward with the restructuring of our airline,” said Matt Koscal, Republic’s vice president of human resources. Because it lacked enough pilots, Republic hasn’t been able to meet its contractual schedules for its major airline customers, American Airlines Group Inc., United Continental Holdings Inc., and Delta Air Lines Inc.
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which represents the Republic pilots, said its members “have more than earned this industry-leading contract,” according to Capt. David Bourne, director of the airline division of the union. About 90% of the eligible pilots participated in the vote, with 1,363 votes in favor and 421 against, the union said.
Earlier this year, American, United and Delta had allowed Republic to reduce its schedules. But Delta earlier this month sued Republic for breach of contract and recovery of damages for allegedly forcing Delta to cancel flights and preventing it from scheduling flights it otherwise would have scheduled. The suit was filed in Superior Court of Fulton County, Ga. Shortly afterward, Republic said it was aware of the complaint, denied it was in breach of Delta’s agreement, but declined to comment further.
Mr. Koscal, Republic’s human resources chief, said the company still has many challenges to overcome to achieve a successful restructuring of the regional airline. But the new pilot contract “helps move this process forward,” he said.
Write to Susan Carey at [email protected]
http://www.wsj.com/articles/republic-airways-pilots-approve-labor-contract-1445970253

What are the tradeoffs. Ive heard the high rates offset loss of soft credit and higher health ins. Does anyone know the negatives of this contract?

John Carr 10-27-2015 03:58 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2000787)
However we have learned from our past mistakes. So history IS NOT doomed to repeat its self

Absolute statements are in the same realm as "never say never".

Four One O 10-27-2015 04:51 PM


Originally Posted by dfwflyboy (Post 2000808)
What are the tradeoffs. Ive heard the high rates offset loss of soft credit and higher health ins. Does anyone know the negatives of this contract?


Well you're source is wrong.

100% Leg-by-leg cancellation pay
1:4 Trip Rig
1:2 Duty Rig
4:12 Min Day

Health caps at 25 or 35% depending on which insurance and the HDHP is frozen for 2 years and is limited to a 10% annual increase after this period. I believe our traditional plan is also limited to a 10% increase YOY.

All protections the old CBA didn't have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:56 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands