![]() |
Originally Posted by GodIsGood
(Post 2114472)
The ones with a new hire pass rate of 95%.
I just can't wrap my head around why so many view the interview as being so important at the regional level in this climate. |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 2114635)
Which are? Mesa failures and fires have been hired every where else, including those who seem to have a superiority complex...
I just can't wrap my head around why so many view the interview as being so important at the regional level in this climate. |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 2114635)
Which are? Mesa failures and fires have been hired every where else, including those who seem to have a superiority complex...
I just can't wrap my head around why so many view the interview as being so important at the regional level in this climate. |
Originally Posted by adspilot
(Post 2114845)
There is the answer. You aren't intelligent enough to understand the importance of the interview process.
Your ad-hominem attack shows that you can't answer the question. |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 2113453)
Anyone who believes this is an idiot. You are given a class date, you don't have the job until you pass IOE and are flying the line.
Tell me, why does spending tons of money to fly people to an interview, to ask you stupid questions, that could be answered over the phone, make any sense? You still have to prove yourself in training, regardless. Only thing that Mesa can't do is discriminate against you for being ugly. |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 2113561)
65$ hr is my justification.
|
Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84
(Post 2114973)
Captain pay?! OUCH that's painful...
|
That, dear Sir, is a crock of crap. Whether or not one does an interview in person, one typically gets a CJO. And even with an interview, people fail out of training. At every airline, be it regional or major. As I am sure you know, there are darn good people who attend interviews who never get a CJO at a major, based on HR craziness.
Standards my butt. If that were the case, AQP wouldn't be the norm now. We'd all be doing things the hard way as folks 10-20 years ago had to do.
Originally Posted by Squallrider
(Post 2114636)
Because people still have to pass training, depending on the aircraft, regionals are paying $30,000-$50,000 to send someone to training. Some regionals still have standards when it comes to hiring.
|
See my post above. It will save me typing a LMAO in response to your post.
Originally Posted by adspilot
(Post 2114845)
There is the answer. You aren't intelligent enough to understand the importance of the interview process.
|
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 2114855)
What are you achieving by having an interview, if you are hiring our own failures and fires?
Your ad-hominem attack shows that you can't answer the question. And also, we don't hire your failures and fires, or anybody else's failures and fires. |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 2113877)
An interview can't determine their ability to pass training. Their PRIA record tells more.
|
Envoy's "solid interview process" was tougher than Mesa's in the respect that they ask about 7 Jepps questions that Mesa doesn't.
|
It makes sense to me. Having to pay for some guy's international flight that isnt even an employee sounds crazier. Its already expensive to fly pilots domestically I'm sure. It just doesnt seem feasible to bring some random dude over from abroad.
And I get the idea of having interviews. The process forces you to study. Ive learned a lot about jet engines and electrical systems on my own the last few weeks. Much more than if all had to do was make a phone call. Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by say again
(Post 2115045)
You do know that there is more to hiring someone at company than whether or not they can pass the training? You say some asinine stuff on these boards....:rolleyes:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:13 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands