Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
XNA instrument approaches >

XNA instrument approaches

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

XNA instrument approaches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2017 | 10:58 AM
  #11  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
I don't know if it was planned this way - but from my understanding, the *new* parallel runway was built to close to the original runway and they will be using the *old* runway as a parallel surface as a taxiway.

This could be an old wive's tale
That's what ground told me when I asked.
Reply
Old 01-06-2017 | 11:00 AM
  #12  
E175 Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: E175
Default

Originally Posted by N6279P
That's not true at all. The airline I work for operated all of its flights there yesterday.
Mesa??....
Reply
Old 01-06-2017 | 11:27 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: RJ
Default

Similar thing in Ashville, NC.

Single runway at airport needed to be extended. So they built a temp runway right next to it and numbered it 35 instead if 34.

Never knew how wide 150' is till I landed in a 100' wide runway on the RJ in hard IMC. Im sure the airbus folks love it also. At least the put an ILS on the temp. runway there.
Reply
Old 01-06-2017 | 02:58 PM
  #14  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
I don't think XNA is big enough to warrant parallel runways. I think the previous post about needing a new runway was more accurate. It may have something to do with a minimum distance needed between the runway and the parallel taxiway. I know a few airports that had to move the runway further from the taxiway.
And maybe that was the 'too close' part - but that original runway and parallel runway was there for a LONG time before they started building that new runway. I'll agree with you that KXNA doesn't seem to have the traffic to *need* two runways. Maybe if I'm there working on some of the recent procedures/etc... I'll have the chance to engage the airport authority and satisfy my curiousity.
Reply
Old 01-06-2017 | 09:21 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 761
Likes: 7
Default

The ILS 34 in XNA is operational. Different freq than charted.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
SongMan
Flight Schools and Training
18
06-08-2014 08:31 AM
jmcmanna
Safety
3
12-05-2012 07:01 PM
PiperPower
Military
40
07-09-2009 06:44 PM
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
14
03-15-2006 01:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices