Search
Notices
Republic Airways Regional Airline

A220

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2018, 01:07 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,899
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
According to DAL, the Bombardier C was to be replacing larger than 50 seat RJs, so those Larger RJs could be replacing 50 seat RJs, thus upgauging the fleet.

It does, however, have a VERY long range, so it could do many flights that were impossible on any RJ (or MD-88/MD-90/B-717), and even some small Airbuses and the Boeing 737, I believe. An example that Bombardier used, was a typical load nonstop from London City airport to Montreal using the smaller CS-100.
DALs spectacular pricing on the CS-100 was contingent upon using it on routes that were less than 1000 miles... allegedly.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 07:17 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
ChopNDrop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox View Post
DALs spectacular pricing on the CS-100 was contingent upon using it on routes that were less than 1000 miles... allegedly.
interesting..
ChopNDrop is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 07:29 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 395
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox View Post
DALs spectacular pricing on the CS-100 was contingent upon using it on routes that were less than 1000 miles... allegedly.
Can you cite that claim?
Random Task is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 07:39 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,899
Default

Originally Posted by Random Task View Post
Can you cite that claim?
There’s some reporting on the topic

https://leehamnews.com/2017/05/25/bo...ompany-claims/
Otterbox is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 11:47 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Default

“Parenthetically, the Delta testimony revealed that its transaction with BBD priced the CS100 as a 1,000-mile airplane. Should Delta begin using the aircraft on longer routes, additional monies will be paid to Bombardier. The CS100 has a range of more than 2,900nm.”

Who wrote this. That is the dumbest claim thinking Delta will have to pay a surcharge if they fly it over 1000 miles.. Im sure Delta is set up on autopay using a Delta skymiles card also. Atleast they will earn points....
amcnd is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 12:46 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by DiveAndDrive View Post
Eventually, sure. And I’m okay if flying is absorbed by mainline. More jobs for us. But initially the A220 is to replace/supplement the MD80/717 fleet.
There are no current plans to retire 717’s. Replacement airframes for the MD88/90 are the 737-900 and A321. The A220 is planned mostly to replace larger RJ flying and some nitch long haul flying. The larger RJ’s freed up will trickle down allowing Delta to park 50 seaters.
Delta will owe a very small penalty if they average over 1000 miles per leg.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 12:58 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
“Parenthetically, the Delta testimony revealed that its transaction with BBD priced the CS100 as a 1,000-mile airplane. Should Delta begin using the aircraft on longer routes, additional monies will be paid to Bombardier. The CS100 has a range of more than 2,900nm.”

Who wrote this. That is the dumbest claim thinking Delta will have to pay a surcharge if they fly it over 1000 miles.. Im sure Delta is set up on autopay using a Delta skymiles card also. Atleast they will earn points....
Actually Delta will have to pay. If they wouldn’t pay, then Boeing could take this back to court for dumping. That’s why this case was thrown out of court to begin with as they were able to justify the price they paid.

If Skywest or Republic (assuming future orders) decide to make any 175SC into a 76 seat jet, they too will have to pay Embraer to recertify the planes into the 76 seat configuration.

This isn’t anything new either. Mainline aircraft have always had more options and configurations, including derating options, available compared to Regional aircraft.

Delta’s 1000nm range is an average from what I gather, not a hard limit unlike the seating in the 175SC.
Tpinks is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 01:39 PM
  #18  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
There are no current plans to retire 717’s. Replacement airframes for the MD88/90 are the 737-900 and A321. The A220 is planned mostly to replace larger RJ flying and some nitch long haul flying. The larger RJ’s freed up will trickle down allowing Delta to park 50 seaters.
Delta will owe a very small penalty if they average over 1000 miles per leg.
I doubt Delta will have to pay anything at all. As soon as Airbus takes full control, and with the new NAFTA agreement, there is really no penalty unless Airbus decided to enforce it on Delta, which seems unlikely. I would still wager the A220 is a growth aircraft, not an RJ replacement.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 10-07-2018, 07:17 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: Captain of my destiny
Posts: 25
Default

Dear Eight Pound, Six Ounce, Newborn Baby Jesus, don’t even know a word yet, just a little infant, so cuddly, but still omnipotent... Please drive a wooden stake into the heart of “Regional Jet Flying” and restore that to mainline.... Amen
My daily prayer...
Taco Cat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TalkTurkey
Endeavor Air
25445
01-27-2023 05:34 PM
jetliner1526
JetBlue
290
08-09-2018 08:52 AM
horrido27
Delta
27
07-31-2018 03:01 PM
Bluedriver
JetBlue
23
07-21-2018 04:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices