![]() |
Just left the schoolhouse, they are still saying it with no specifics. AG did come in and do a short talk, she was asked and did say it was for planned growth, but again, she didn't go any further than that.
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2766150)
Honestly, we’ve been hearing that “something is going on behind the scenes” for over a year now. No announcement.
|
Originally Posted by Web265
(Post 2766161)
Just left the schoolhouse, they are still saying it with no specifics. AG did come in and do a short talk, she was asked and did say it was for planned growth, but again, she didn't go any further than that.
1) Scope relief 2) Someone loses flying #1 doesn’t appear as if it’s going to happen, nor should anyone be hoping for that. #2 also appears less likely now that GoJet was saved by the CRJ550 deal. The only logical airline we could possibly take flying from in the future would be Compass. And even then, they don’t operate anywhere close to 100 aircraft. The CRJ550 could allow the possibility of adding larger RJs, so that’s something to watch. Also, we could technically operate those planes for someone other than the Big 3, but again, that seems unlikely. I’m not trying to be negative. I actually like my job and I think Republic is a fine place to work. But I think the picture that is being painted in regards to our future is much brighter than it actually is. |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2766191)
I’m not sure what people don’t understand about this “growth” situation
Or what they do understand.... I wasn’t making an argument either way, just reporting what’s being said by those supposedly “in the know”. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2766191)
I’m not sure what people don’t understand about this “growth” situation. There are ONLY two ways we can take those aircraft as additional growth:
1) Scope relief 2) Someone loses flying #1 doesn’t appear as if it’s going to happen, nor should anyone be hoping for that. #2 also appears less likely now that GoJet was saved by the CRJ550 deal. The only logical airline we could possibly take flying from in the future would be Compass. And even then, they don’t operate anywhere close to 100 aircraft. The CRJ550 could allow the possibility of adding larger RJs, so that’s something to watch. Also, we could technically operate those planes for someone other than the Big 3, but again, that seems unlikely. I’m not trying to be negative. I actually like my job and I think Republic is a fine place to work. But I think the picture that is being painted in regards to our future is much brighter than it actually is. |
We are sitting on a ton of cash and will take Compass if it's still a good look when the time is right IMO. TSH lost their chances of selling all 3 certs a long time ago. Also, keep in mind other Ejet contracts will be expiring this year and next for some other people (Mesa). We have the staffing to take those quickly and the reliability numbers to back us as a good quick and ready solution.
...but then again it's all speculation and we really have no clue what's going on behind closed doors till it happens. All I know if Befford wants to go head to head with SKW and sitting here burning money on new planes and pilots that aren't going to fly isn't something he probably intends to do. |
Republic Hiring Again?
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2764993)
We could easily take 4/5 seats out of the E170 to add to AA and then take delivery of 76 seat E175s.
That’s just one possibility. Nothing is certain, but there are opportunities for growth. I do think a lot of what’s been going on has been lying on the hopes of some deal going through which could completely fall apart. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Say hello to the new erj 550!
Originally Posted by IDrive175
(Post 2765246)
No, before my time I guess. Would love to hear about it.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...on-pla-425557/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Where are RAH pilots going? Heard that since the big 3 usually don’t hire from RAH, pilots tend to move onto JB, SW, Atlas, etc...
Would it be fair to say that a person should choose another regional to a higher chance at going to the big 3? Disclaimer: I’m jot bashing the company or the pilot group. Have lots of friends there and my interaction with the company has been nothing, but positive. Just trying to get a feel for career progression after RAH. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 2768870)
Where are RAH pilots going? Heard that since the big 3 usually don’t hire from RAH, pilots tend to move onto JB, SW, Atlas, etc...
Would it be fair to say that a person should choose another regional to a higher chance at going to the big 3? Disclaimer: I’m jot bashing the company or the pilot group. Have lots of friends there and my interaction with the company has been nothing, but positive. Just trying to get a feel for career progression after RAH. Republic pilots go to any of the Big 6, like any other qualified applicants. I can tell you first hand this rumor has been going on since 2008, maybe longer. Rather than criticizing yourself when you get no call from a legacy, people find it easier to base assumptions on useless/groundless statistics provided by the union. These stats are published from pilots that choose to VOLUNTEER their info to them, like any other carrier. It’s a baseless rumor, that’s all it is. |
Originally Posted by stabapch
(Post 2768886)
To be blunt and honest, if you’re going to believe that any air carrier is going to turn down your application because of a specific prior air carrier listed, over any lack of personal attribution’s provided on your resume, this probably isn’t the right career for you. You define yourself, you make the effort and you get yourself hired. Republic’s name will not help you, nor hurt you. Either will any other regional outside of the 10-year flows.
Republic pilots go to any of the Big 6, like any other qualified applicants. I can tell you first hand this rumor has been going on since 2008, maybe longer. Rather than criticizing yourself when you get no call from a legacy, people find it easier to base assumptions on useless/groundless statistics provided by the union. These stats are published from pilots that choose to VOLUNTEER their info to them, like any other carrier. It’s a baseless rumor, that’s all it is. Truthfully, I get the whole define yourself and whatever else, but I’m trying to figure out the “why” to the “what” and your reply didn’t help much. To add to my hunch, upgrade at RAH is a slightly longer than other regionals (for obvious reasons), so becoming a check airman would also take a bit longer compared to other companies. This would be my guess, but I could be wrong. Anyone have any thoughts on this? |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 2768971)
I get your point, but that only answer the second part of my question. Still looking for answers on part one of my question.
Truthfully, I get the whole define yourself and whatever else, but I’m trying to figure out the “why” to the “what” and your reply didn’t help much. To add to my hunch, upgrade at RAH is a slightly longer than other regionals (for obvious reasons), so becoming a check airman would also take a bit longer compared to other companies. This would be my guess, but I could be wrong. Anyone have any thoughts on this? |
Originally Posted by JayD
(Post 2769198)
Try rereading his post. The first sentence of the second paragraph answers your first question.
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 2769231)
So, my fault for not clarifying, why does it seem that RAH pilots take longer to end up at the big 3 than other pilots at other regionals?
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 2769231)
So, my fault for not clarifying, why does it seem that RAH pilots take longer to end up at the big 3 than other pilots at other regionals?
Those who want out quickly and put the effort into it (and don’t just ***** about not getting a call incessantly without making active steps to change/improve their resume) typically get out quickly. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 2769231)
So, my fault for not clarifying, why does it seem that RAH pilots take longer to end up at the big 3 than other pilots at other regionals?
Where are you getting this information from? Is your goal to get to a legacy fast? It takes good timing, a clean background and a full resume. Looking for Delta? You’ll need to be atleast 6-foot, broad shoulders and preferably not a white-male. Wherever you choose to “pay your dues” is negligible. QOL should be the only consideration. |
Originally Posted by TheWeatherman
(Post 2769254)
What statistics are you referring to?
As far as comparison to other regionals, I haven’t spoken to a mainline pilot that’s come from RAH. Put that with how fast it is to become LCA or some other leadership position at a different shop (and mainline hires LCA and pilots in leadership position), I get my hypothesis. But it’s just that, a hypothesis. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 2769417)
Recruiting stats showed RAH pilots going to the Big 3 in smaller numbers compared to the other companies.
As far as comparison to other regionals, I haven’t spoken to a mainline pilot that’s come from RAH. Put that with how fast it is to become LCA or some other leadership position at a different shop (and mainline hires LCA and pilots in leadership position), I get my hypothesis. But it’s just that, a hypothesis. |
Originally Posted by stabapch
(Post 2769413)
They don’t take any longer than any other pilots............
Where are you getting this information from? Is your goal to get to a legacy fast? It takes good timing, a clean background and a full resume. Looking for Delta? You’ll need to be atleast 6-foot, broad shoulders and preferably not a white-male. Wherever you choose to “pay your dues” is negligible. QOL should be the only consideration. Again, this is a hypothesis, but I say it’s because upgrading takes longer thus getting a leadership position (LCA, CP, instructor, etc...) takes longer. |
If your on the seniority list at YX, go to the local Facebook page. You will find the info you’re looking for, and yes less then 15 went to the Big 3 last year as pure civilian hires. The volunteer who puts the info together is pretty transparent, and the spread sheets are all there for your review. Yes some (14 I think) I a blank spot for where they left. Also you can get info through ALPA for United, and maybe DAL. American isn’t going to happen for most civilians at YX, so probably stick to the other 2.
Most seem to be going to Southwest, JetBlue or Spirit. Try to get in the training department early, or try to get a union leadership position. |
Originally Posted by Viking6
(Post 2769423)
If your on the seniority list at YX, go to the local Facebook page. You will find the info you’re looking for, and yes less then 15 went to the Big 3 last year as pure civilian hires. The volunteer who puts the info together is pretty transparent, and the spread sheets are all there for your review. Yes some (14 I think) I a blank spot for where they left. Also you can get info through ALPA for United, and maybe DAL. American isn’t going to happen for most civilians at YX, so probably stick to the other 2.
Most seem to be going to Southwest, JetBlue or Spirit. Try to get in the training department early, or try to get a union leadership position. |
Originally Posted by IDrive175
(Post 2769531)
Are you talking about the union FB page, or another one?
|
Originally Posted by Viking6
(Post 2769423)
If your on the seniority list at YX, go to the local Facebook page. You will find the info you’re looking for, and yes less then 15 went to the Big 3 last year as pure civilian hires. The volunteer who puts the info together is pretty transparent, and the spread sheets are all there for your review. Yes some (14 I think) I a blank spot for where they left. Also you can get info through ALPA for United, and maybe DAL. American isn’t going to happen for most civilians at YX, so probably stick to the other 2.
Most seem to be going to Southwest, JetBlue or Spirit. Try to get in the training department early, or try to get a union leadership position. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 2769417)
Recruiting stats showed RAH pilots going to the Big 3 in smaller numbers compared to the other companies.
As far as comparison to other regionals, I haven’t spoken to a mainline pilot that’s come from RAH. Put that with how fast it is to become LCA or some other leadership position at a different shop (and mainline hires LCA and pilots in leadership position), I get my hypothesis. But it’s just that, a hypothesis. Your telling me that Over 30000 mainline pilots you have never talked to one that came from mokulele, shuttle, us airways jets for jobs, Chautauqua, frontier, and what ever company I missed the republic owned? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by TangoIndiaMike1
(Post 2769762)
Your telling me that Over 30000 mainline pilots you have never talked to one that came from mokulele, shuttle, us airways jets for jobs, Chautauqua, frontier, and what ever company I missed the republic owned?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by ORD170
(Post 2769885)
In 2014-2015 Republic was losing pilots monthly to both US and DAL. I personally know at least s dozen that went to DAL in 2015. I left early 2018, and I think the union said less then 40 for the entire year (2017) left to big 3. The numbers have definitely dwindled over the last several years. I believe this is common knowledge on the line at Republic.
This confirms my hunch. It’s not that I spoke to all 30,000 mainline pilots and none came from RAH, just the the ones I’ve spoken to didn’t come from RAH. Actually, I know of an AA pilot who flew for Chautauqua, but he got hired about a decade ago? I’m referring to more recent numbers. Again, I don’t want to come off like I’m insulting the pilot group. That’s not my intention. I just wanted some info on the matter is all. |
In my recruiting materials, there’s a chart that says 24% of the pilots who leave go to one of the legacies. Next one down is Southwest at 19%. After that is all the Spirits, Allegiants, etc. So actually, according to that chart, Southwest is #1 at 19%, and the legacies average 8% each.
|
Originally Posted by IDrive175
(Post 2769915)
In my recruiting materials, there’s a chart that says 24% of the pilots who leave go to one of the legacies. Next one down is Southwest at 19%. After that is all the Spirits, Allegiants, etc. So actually, according to that chart, Southwest is #1 at 19%, and the legacies average 8% each.
But of those that go to the legacies a half to two thirds of those have prior military background. For those of us without that experience, it dampens expectations to move on to one of those carriers. That’s what the recruiting chart doesn’t show, hence the talk about it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2769953)
But of those that go to the legacies a half to two thirds of those have prior military background. For those of us without that experience, it dampens expectations to move on to one of those carriers. That’s what the recruiting chart doesn’t show, hence the talk about it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 2769906)
Less than 40 went to the Big 3? Out of a pilot group that’s 2000+ strong?
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2769953)
But of those that go to the legacies a half to two thirds of those have prior military background. For those of us without that experience, it dampens expectations to move on to one of those carriers. That’s what the recruiting chart doesn’t show, hence the talk about it.
The point being these are just dry numbers. You can’t justify anything off of these stats without knowing any of the above mentioned. Republic does not have a flow.... Your the flow! The guys with military experience have a “full” resume. They can check the “volunteer” box and possibly “leadership” box depending on what they did. Civilians need to put effort into that in order to be competitive and this doesn’t necessarily mean “leadership” positions at the airline or union. Unfortunately, the regionals set a bad example during their hiring sprees. There is no “pilot shortage” at mainline, so it involves selling yourself to get a job and a lot of younger guys with no experience outside of being a CFI or just the aviation industry have a hard time demonstrating this and lack the effort because they were “handed” their first 121 job. The regional bought them... What I’m seeing nowadays is guys who are just flight hour motivated, which is really the last thing that makes you competitive. If you’re going to use dry statistics like these to base your decisions off of without using basic logic then you’re making a mistake. |
Republic Hiring Again?
Originally Posted by stabapch
(Post 2770001)
And where are the stats that show how many guys applied? Or how many years they had in? Training failures? Background issues? Interest in mainline to begin with? Was mainline hiring? Etc....
The point being these are just dry numbers. You can’t justify anything off of these stats without knowing any of the above mentioned. Republic does not have a flow.... Your the flow! The guys with military experience have a “full” resume. They can check the “volunteer” box and possibly “leadership” box depending on what they did. Civilians need to put effort into that in order to be competitive and this doesn’t necessarily mean “leadership” positions at the airline or union. Unfortunately, the regionals set a bad example during their hiring sprees. There is no “pilot shortage” at mainline, so it involves selling yourself to get a job and a lot of younger guys with no experience outside of being a CFI or just the aviation industry have a hard time demonstrating this and lack the effort because they were “handed” their first 121 job. The regional bought them... What I’m seeing nowadays is guys who are just flight hour motivated, which is really the last thing that makes you competitive. If you’re going to use dry statistics like these to base your decisions off of without using basic logic then you’re making a mistake. The point is that when looking at how many the legacies hired last year and the size of our pilot group that number should be larger. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2770004)
The point is that when looking at how many the legacies hired last year and the size of our pilot group that number should be larger.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk But I can’t support people who believe Republic’s name is damaging to their chances. Look at the individual that’s applying. Personally, if something doesn’t go my way, then the first thing I look at/blame is myself before I even consider any outside factors and it works! I don’t want to generalize, but you seldom see this discipline this day and age. It’s always somebody else’s fault. |
Originally Posted by stabapch
(Post 2770020)
Agreed.
But I can’t support people who believe Republic’s name is damaging to their chances. Look at the individual that’s applying. Personally, if something doesn’t go my way, then the first thing I look at/blame is myself before I even consider any outside factors and it works! I don’t want to generalize, but you seldom see this discipline this day and age. It’s always somebody else’s fault. Well on that I certainly agree with you 100%. You have to have personal accountability. What I think people are struggling to get at, myself included, is why the disparity? Sure we have a more senior group that is likely not trying as hard as a more junior group like Compass. Is that the only reason though? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by stabapch
(Post 2770001)
And where are the stats that show how many guys applied? Or how many years they had in? Training failures? Background issues? Years of education? GPA? Interest in mainline to begin with? Was mainline hiring? Etc....
The point being these are just dry numbers. You can’t justify anything off of these stats without knowing any of the above mentioned. Republic does not have a flow.... Your the flow! The guys with military experience have a “full” resume. They can check the “volunteer” box and possibly “leadership” box depending on what they did. Civilians need to put effort into that in order to be competitive and this doesn’t necessarily mean “leadership” positions at the airline or union. Unfortunately, the regionals set a bad example during their hiring sprees. There is no “pilot shortage” at mainline, so it involves selling yourself to get a job and a lot of younger guys with no experience outside of being a CFI or just the aviation industry have a hard time demonstrating this and lack the effort because they were “handed” their first 121 job. The regional bought them... What I’m seeing nowadays is guys who are just flight hour motivated, which is really the last thing that makes you competitive. If you’re going to use dry statistics like these to base your decisions off of without using basic logic then you’re making a mistake. No it’s not because every pilot has a check ride failure, no degree, felon, or just sucks. Many instructors have at least BA degrees and some have MS degrees and aren’t getting called. I will concede we probably have a segment at YX who are lifers, but that still doesn’t account for the small numbers moving on to big 3. Some choose to believe that management at YX and would never do anything unethical. From my experience that’s simply not the case, but I eagerly await them proving me wrong. |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2770034)
Well on that I certainly agree with you 100%. You have to have personal accountability.
What I think people are struggling to get at, myself included, is why the disparity? Sure we have a more senior group that is likely not trying as hard as a more junior group like Compass. Is that the only reason though? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk JetBlue has swept up RAH pilots for years. They have actually stated to new hires that they like the way our pilots are trained. Whatever that means... but it’s a plus for the company. As far as mainline, it could be we have less people putting in the effort, it could be luck of draw, nobody knows unless we can compare ALL regional pilots to one another. I wouldn’t blame the name though. |
Originally Posted by IDrive175
(Post 2769915)
In my recruiting materials, there’s a chart that says 24% of the pilots who leave go to one of the legacies. Next one down is Southwest at 19%. After that is all the Spirits, Allegiants, etc. So actually, according to that chart, Southwest is #1 at 19%, and the legacies average 8% each.
|
Premium pay being offered for extra flying today and tomorrow. But there’s only 2 trips in open time. Everyone, including myself, is saying we’re over staffed, then this happens.
Anyone know what’s going on? Are we picking up flying for someone? |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2774537)
Premium pay being offered for extra flying today and tomorrow. But there’s only 2 trips in open time. Everyone, including myself, is saying we’re over staffed, then this happens.
Anyone know what’s going on? Are we picking up flying for someone? All XJ flying. |
Originally Posted by Longhornmaniac8
(Post 2774544)
There were a ****load of IAH trips that got dumped on us for the month of March. Mostly BTR and CRP overnights, some over and over again.
All XJ flying. What an industry to work in. |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2774563)
🤣🤣🤣🤣 Wow..... those poor souls can’t even cover their own flying yet they get awarded brand new EJets.
What an industry to work in. |
Originally Posted by stabapch
(Post 2774571)
My thoughts exactly, it’s hilarious. They’re still not filling classes. This summer it’s gonna be “ExpressJet operated by Republic Airways”......
|
Hi everyone. How's the hiring situation right now, any updates?. Still overstaffed/training delays/December classes?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands