Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Republic Airways (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/republic-airways/)
-   -   Choose Wisely (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/republic-airways/133291-choose-wisely.html)

fortyeight 03-09-2021 06:19 PM


Originally Posted by TJBrass (Post 3204667)
"If I lived west of the Rockies Pittsburg, I probably wouldn't come to Republic..."

Yea I can’t see why anyone outside of the northeast would chose Republic. I don’t want to knock YX too hard as they’ve been pretty good to me, despite the displacements, but man... outside of NY or the Ohio river valley it’s really not that attractive anymore. Especially for commuters. ORD isn’t even attainable which is arguably the most commutable hub in the country. Would be nice to see a massive ORD vacancy to turn things around, but I’ve been here long enough to know better.

glassnpowder98 03-09-2021 06:24 PM


Originally Posted by coodrough568 (Post 3204858)
and almost no growth since every major is scoped out on large RJs. If you’re there and senior it might not be bad, but when we get over covid, we have high oil prices and a $hit economy coming. Wouldn’t want to be at the bottom of any seniority list that has almost no growth potential.

You’re right that large RJ’s are pretty well scoped out until contracts come up. However, we have some airplanes about to come on the line that are getting reconfigured with 65 seats that could be limitless under American scope. Seems like they’re testing the waters at the moment with the plan, but it could end up being American’s version of the 550. Both of those fleets might not make sense with expensive oil, but it might not be the doom and gloom you’re portraying

rickair7777 03-09-2021 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by Longhornmaniac8 (Post 3204886)
I don't think that's a provable assertion. There is value in keeping good operators, too, which often results in realized savings. If what you were saying is universally true, only the cheapest would succeed. Industry-wide, the opposite tends to be true on the average. The ones that are neither great operationally nor cheap are the ones that will struggle. In other words, you better be damn cheap (Mesa), or damn good at what you do (Republic, Skywest, Endeavor).

I think you have a very myopic view of the industry.

Large, reliable, with economy-of-scale to help with costs.

Or a dirt cheap cockroach, and they keep you around to keep these guys^^^ honest.

Anything else may be on borrowed time. 50 seaters are on borrowed time (for real this time).

SoFloFlyer 03-09-2021 09:36 PM


Originally Posted by glassnpowder98 (Post 3205025)
You’re right that large RJ’s are pretty well scoped out until contracts come up. However, we have some airplanes about to come on the line that are getting reconfigured with 65 seats that could be limitless under American scope. Seems like they’re testing the waters at the moment with the plan, but it could end up being American’s version of the 550. Both of those fleets might not make sense with expensive oil, but it might not be the doom and gloom you’re portraying

I read this a lot on here. And even if it’s true, the reality is that if RAH hires, people will come. Because a commute to NY is better than unemployment.

sanicom3205 03-10-2021 02:39 AM


Originally Posted by glassnpowder98 (Post 3205025)
You’re right that large RJ’s are pretty well scoped out until contracts come up. However, we have some airplanes about to come on the line that are getting reconfigured with 65 seats that could be limitless under American scope. Seems like they’re testing the waters at the moment with the plan, but it could end up being American’s version of the 550. Both of those fleets might not make sense with expensive oil, but it might not be the doom and gloom you’re portraying

This isn’t right. Those planes are definitely limited by scope as well.

UnbeatenPath 03-10-2021 07:33 AM


Originally Posted by sanicom3205 (Post 3205088)
This isn’t right. Those planes are definitely limited by scope as well.

From my limited skill of reading comprehension I read it as 50-65 seats is unlimited. 66+ seats is limited to 40% of the narrowbody fleet. Am I wrong?

sanicom3205 03-10-2021 08:50 AM


Originally Posted by UnbeatenPath (Post 3205226)
From my limited skill of reading comprehension I read it as 50-65 seats is unlimited. 66+ seats is limited to 40% of the narrowbody fleet. Am I wrong?

Yes. RJs as a whole are limited to 75% of narrow body fleet. “Large” RJs (66-76 seats) are limited to 40% of the narrowbody fleet.

amberdash 03-10-2021 09:37 AM

Has there been any new base rumors? Would really like to gtfo of NY...

GHawk 03-10-2021 12:31 PM


Originally Posted by amberdash (Post 3205271)
Has there been any new base rumors? Would really like to gtfo of NY...

Recently heard from a sim instructor that he’s been hearing ATL again. From my understanding it was basically a sure thing before COVID hit. I’ll believe it when I see it.

Longhornmaniac8 03-10-2021 12:37 PM


Originally Posted by GHawk (Post 3205346)
Recently heard from a sim instructor that he’s been hearing ATL again. From my understanding it was basically a sure thing before COVID hit. I’ll believe it when I see it.

Yeah ATL and CLT have been the popular ones lately. Contractually, we should already have a crew room at CLT based on the number of departures.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands