|
Originally Posted by package puppy
(Post 1394760)
Not kidding and no sarcasm, just stating that the lack of any cancellation pay may have more of a negative impact on pilots once the sequester hits. No politics, no dog in this fight, just an observation considering so many comments about the company not offering cancellation pay.
The likelihood of this making cancellation pay a bigger issue is pretty small since I think the true impact will be a non-issue. |
Originally Posted by rickt86
(Post 1394387)
the only thing I regret is the poor union at eagle. the failed leadership has created a pilot group that has no motivation for change or action.
However one thing we cant control is being undercut. Its even worst from a group that hides behind well they wont give us a new contract. At least the gojetz guys admit they are working a street corner. We have the same lack of motivation at Eagle, but ours can at least be blamed on failed union leadership. We also have a fairly good contract, even after CH11, we dont just sit around pouting about it, yet reaping the benefits of it with new flying. Your either a saint or a sinner, you cant be both. Also I never even applied to RAH, my friend worked there and told me not to apply. I went to Eagle for a long list of reasons, and I am happy I did. |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 1394169)
Even at eagle, we are losing pilots in the next months. At least 20 a month will go to AA once they start hiring again.
Do you guys really believe this? I mean seriously think this is going to happen? Who fills your head with this nonsense? |
Originally Posted by cubbies4life
(Post 1394864)
Do you guys really believe this? I mean seriously think this is going to happen? Who fills your head with this nonsense?
|
Originally Posted by andreas500
(Post 1394767)
Fair enough, thanks for your clarification. But frankly, I believe the sequester being a source of cancellation due to controllers being reduced is about number 3,789 on a list of 4,000 things that could possibly lead to cancellation of a flight and thus lack of pay.
The likelihood of this making cancellation pay a bigger issue is pretty small since I think the true impact will be a non-issue. This is politics at it's worst - making a statement and (maximizing?) impact on travelling public and industry employees instead of trying to minimize it. So again, I stand corrected if what is now being said by the FAA actually materializes. |
Companies side of the story:
My RJET Workplace - Republic Airways Holdings http://www.myrjetworkplace.com/pilot-qa/ Unions side of the story: www.rahcontractnow.org You decide who makes the better argument. |
JD832, thanks for posting both sides positions. Interesting read.
|
Yeah, real interesting. So the company cancels 50 flights due to weather and don't pay the flight crews, nor does their new proposal have cx pay included. Guess what, the company is still getting paid by mainline partners for all wx cancellations. Seem right to you?
That's just one of many. I'll let someone else take the next one. |
Originally Posted by TillerEnvy
(Post 1396586)
Yeah, real interesting. So the company cancels 50 flights due to weather and don't pay the flight crews, nor does their new proposal have cx pay included. Guess what, the company is still getting paid by mainline partners for all wx cancellations. Seem right to you?
That's just one of many. I'll let someone else take the next one. |
Originally Posted by What
(Post 1396594)
I like the Q&A about Q400 pay. It says that nobody else who does CPA in the continent operates Q400s, then it mentioned that Horizon is different because they are owned by Alaska. Then it mentioned that the only person they could compare was the rates that Colgan but they went bankrupt. SO they can't compare the rates to Horizon??? RIght!!!
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:52 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands