Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
ADS-B in and out? >

ADS-B in and out?

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

ADS-B in and out?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2019 | 11:54 AM
  #1  
mike734's Avatar
Thread Starter
New boss = Old boss
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 1
From: Ca B737
Default ADS-B in and out?

All of our new aircraft are delivered with ADS-B out and all of them should be broadcasting OUT by now or soon. Do any of you have ADS-B IN displayed? We don't and the fleet chief says it may be a few years before we see it on our 737s.
Reply
Old 11-03-2019 | 01:35 PM
  #2  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,194
Likes: 240
Default

That’s lame. I have it on Foreflight for my bug smasher flying. It’s unreasonable not to have it on a commercial aircraft doing far moreflying.
Reply
Old 11-03-2019 | 10:50 PM
  #3  
ASpilot2be's Avatar
Qbicle seat warmer
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: SAAB FO
Default

I saw a picture of flight numbers displayed on an Airbus screen. So I think it’s definitely possible.
Reply
Old 11-04-2019 | 01:45 AM
  #4  
Twin Wasp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
From: Sr. VP of button pushing
Default

With all the PMA and TSO hoops to jump through air carriers are usually the last folks to get new technology. And the cost has to be justified to the higher ups. Out was mandated by the FAA so they had to comply, in is just another video game for the pilots.
Reply
Old 11-04-2019 | 04:45 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
That’s lame. I have it on Foreflight for my bug smasher flying. It’s unreasonable not to have it on a commercial aircraft doing far moreflying.
Airlines are not in a hurry for ADSB in since we have TCAS for traffic and radar, acars and now WiFi for wx and nexrad.
Reply
Old 11-04-2019 | 10:36 AM
  #6  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 701
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Airlines are not in a hurry for ADSB in since we have TCAS for traffic and radar, acars and now WiFi for wx and nexrad.
This, no need to spend money since TCAS does the same thing, perhaps with slightly less accuracy.
Reply
Old 11-04-2019 | 06:18 PM
  #7  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 51
From: Volleyball Player
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This, no need to spend money since TCAS does the same thing, perhaps with slightly less accuracy.
Maybe, I don't know if TCAS is reading ADS-B for conflict resolution. The hardware and software would most certainly have to be updated. I'm wondering how long until the transponder rule goes away...

Last edited by JamesNoBrakes; 11-04-2019 at 06:37 PM.
Reply
Old 11-05-2019 | 08:17 AM
  #8  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 701
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
Maybe, I don't know if TCAS is reading ADS-B for conflict resolution. The hardware and software would most certainly have to be updated. I'm wondering how long until the transponder rule goes away...
Legacy TCAS installations are not reading ADS-B to my knowledge, that would be another hardware update.

ADS-B based TCAS would provide better and more reliable target resolution but right now legacy TCAS covers more targets because most GA planes have transponders whether they need them or not. That's not the case for ADS-B, so for airliners you'd still need legacy TCAS for a good long while. At least I want it.
Reply
Old 11-05-2019 | 08:37 AM
  #9  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,194
Likes: 240
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
ADS-B based TCAS would provide better and more reliable target resolution but right now legacy TCAS covers more targets because most GA planes have transponders whether they need them or not. That's not the case for ADS-B, so for airliners you'd still need legacy TCAS for a good long while. At least I want it.
With a few exceptions - and those mostly in uncontrolled airspace - all general aviation aircraft must have ADS-B out by 1 Jan 2020.

https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/equipadsb/

This will provide BETTER coverage and more accurate coverage than TCAS alone. Keep TCAS if you want it but ADS-B - for a GA aircraft - can be had for less than $1000 with a portable unit, probably three times that linked to an in panel MFD. Having something that works even in radar blind spots and updates once a second (vs every 5-7 seconds at the edge of radar coverage) seems to me to be well worth the investment.

https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/equipads...ties/ins_outs/

Granted, closure isn’t any 1000 knots at the merge, but even some RVs can hit 200 knots. In a 400 knot merge with a tiny experimental kit plane it seems ludicrous that the two seater has better capability to insure he misses you with his ADS-B in than you have to insure you miss him with your TCAS when you are flying 121.

Just my personal opinion.
Reply
Old 11-11-2019 | 05:19 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

TCAS provides far better collision avoidance than ADSB. It provides specific guidance on what is required to avoid a collision and if the other aircraft is TCAS equipped data links between the two aircraft to coordinate deconfliction maneuvers. ADSB does none of the above.
A very large segment of the GA fleets will not have ADSB on 1 Jan or ever under current rules. They can fly anywhere below 10,500 feet and it’s not required unless you want to enter controlled airspace.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices