SWA Grounds 130 737s...
Over a 75# weight discrepancy?
That seems awfully conservative and like, unnecessary, it's not a BE-1900. Must be the optics associated with "737" these days. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN2680HG |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3130502)
Over a 75# weight discrepancy?
That seems awfully conservative and like, unnecessary, it's not a BE-1900. Must be the optics associated with "737" these days. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN2680HG |
Originally Posted by BobZ
(Post 3130514)
Well taking off 1 pound overweight or 10000.....you are just as guilty I guess.
Although I guess if the 75# was at the very nose or tail, it would have more lever-arm and therefore more significance. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3130502)
Over a 75# weight discrepancy?
That seems awfully conservative and like, unnecessary, it's not a BE-1900. Must be the optics associated with "737" these days. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN2680HG |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:58 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands