SWA Grounds 130 737s...
#1
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Over a 75# weight discrepancy?
That seems awfully conservative and like, unnecessary, it's not a BE-1900.
Must be the optics associated with "737" these days.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN2680HG
That seems awfully conservative and like, unnecessary, it's not a BE-1900.
Must be the optics associated with "737" these days.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN2680HG
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Over a 75# weight discrepancy?
That seems awfully conservative and like, unnecessary, it's not a BE-1900.
Must be the optics associated with "737" these days.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN2680HG
That seems awfully conservative and like, unnecessary, it's not a BE-1900.
Must be the optics associated with "737" these days.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN2680HG
#3
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,931
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Although I guess if the 75# was at the very nose or tail, it would have more lever-arm and therefore more significance.
#4
Over a 75# weight discrepancy?
That seems awfully conservative and like, unnecessary, it's not a BE-1900.
Must be the optics associated with "737" these days.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN2680HG
That seems awfully conservative and like, unnecessary, it's not a BE-1900.
Must be the optics associated with "737" these days.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN2680HG
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



