![]() |
USS Truman collision
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5...rier-collides/
https://www.c6f.navy.mil/Press-Room/...lision-at-sea/ USS Harry S. Truman Involved in Collision at SeaBy U.S. Sixth Fleet Public AffairsMEDITERRANEAN SEA – The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) was involved in a collision with the merchant vessel Besiktas-M at approximately 11:46 p.m. local time, Feb. 12, while operating in the vicinity of Port Said, Egypt, in the Mediterranean Sea. The collision did not endanger the Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) as there are no reports of flooding or injuries. The propulsion plants are unaffected and in a safe and stable condition. The incident is under investigation. More information will be released as it becomes available. |
Rumor is the warships switched off AIS (commercial shipping equivalent of transponder). That implies they had elevated their tactical condition, which implies they might have been conducting flight ops, which would restrict their ability to manuever.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3882820)
Rumor is the warships switched off AIS (commercial shipping equivalent of transponder). That implies they had elevated their tactical condition, which implies they might have been conducting flight ops, which would restrict their ability to manuever.
|
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
(Post 3882839)
That is unlikely. They were surrounded by 30+ other ships all waiting to go through the canal. Ships turn off their AIS all the time. They are supposed to turn it on in "congested" areas, but I wouldn't be surprised if Naval vessels leave it off while they transit the canal. That's a critical moment and you don't really want to give too much notice that you are placing an expensive target in a confined area. That would be pretty wild to conduct flight operations when they were literally surrounded by 10 tankers within 5 nm.
|
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
(Post 3882839)
That is unlikely. They were surrounded by 30+ other ships all waiting to go through the canal. Ships turn off their AIS all the time. They are supposed to turn it on in "congested" areas, but I wouldn't be surprised if Naval vessels leave it off while they transit the canal. That's a critical moment and you don't really want to give too much notice that you are placing an expensive target in a confined area. That would be pretty wild to conduct flight operations when they were literally surrounded by 10 tankers within 5 nm.
|
But would they really be running flight ops in such a congested area? Don't carriers go 25 knots during flight ops? That's pretty fast when you are surrounded by anchored boats.
|
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
(Post 3882852)
But would they really be running flight ops in such a congested area? Don't carriers go 25 knots during flight ops? That's pretty fast when you are surrounded by anchored boats.
|
Update with pictures…
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3882820)
Rumor is the warships switched off AIS (commercial shipping equivalent of transponder). That implies they had elevated their tactical condition, which implies they might have been conducting flight ops, which would restrict their ability to manuever.
|
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
(Post 3882852)
But would they really be running flight ops in such a congested area? Don't carriers go 25 knots during flight ops? That's pretty fast when you are surrounded by anchored boats.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands